{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1327870,
        "msgid": "jamsostek-clarifies-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-06-13 00:00:00",
        "title": "Jamsostek clarifies",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP\/LEI",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Jamsostek clarifies In response to the letter from Ham Hus of Bandar Lampung, published in The Jakarta Post, of June 2, 2003 titled Corruption case at PT Jamsostek, we would like to clarify as follows: * While thanking Ham Hus for his attention to PT Jamsostek, we regret that his statement about graft involving Rp 23 billion is not correct. It would be wiser if Hum did not judge other people. * As for the settlement of the case involving the land on Jl. Jend.",
        "content": "<p>Jamsostek clarifies<\/p>\n<p>In response to the letter from Ham Hus of Bandar Lampung,<br>\npublished in The Jakarta Post, of June 2, 2003 titled Corruption<br>\ncase at PT Jamsostek, we would like to clarify as follows:<\/p>\n<p>* While thanking Ham Hus for his attention to PT Jamsostek, we<br>\nregret that his statement about graft involving Rp 23 billion is<br>\nnot correct. It would be wiser if Hum did not judge other people.<\/p>\n<p>* As for the settlement of the case involving the land on Jl.<br>\nJend. Gatot Subroto Jakarta, where the Jamsostek Tower building<br>\nnow stands, we have opted for the legal course at the South<br>\nJakarta District Court and have paid Rp 18.5 billion for an<br>\namicable settlement under the following considerations:<\/p>\n<p>- Payment is made with the approval of the company's supervisory<br>\nboard.<\/p>\n<p>- Approval has also been given by the shareholders\/Minister for<br>\nState-Owned Enterprises.<\/p>\n<p>- If an amicable settlement had not been sought, there would be a<br>\ndemand to pay a higher amount (Rp 182.7 billion) or a possibility<br>\nthat the building and the land would be lost.<br>\n- A protracted court case would take a long time (two years or<br>\nmore, which would mean a loss of Rp 124 billion as two years'<br>\nrent).<br>\n- If a legal dispute continued, there would be no prospective<br>\ntenants as every tenant would require a statement that the place<\/p>\n<p>is not being disputed.<br>\n* A statement indicating corruption by the board of directors of<br>\nPT Jamsostek is therefore not correct.<\/p>\n<p>*  If Ham Hus is interested to see the evidence of what we have<br>\nexplained above, the management of PT Jamsostek will be very<br>\nhappy to be of assistance.<\/p>\n<p>H. D. SUYONO, Head of Public Relations Bureau, PT Jamsostek,<br>\nJakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/jamsostek-clarifies-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}