{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1331969,
        "msgid": "is-brti-independent-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-12-16 00:00:00",
        "title": "Is BRTI independent?",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Is BRTI independent? Indonesian Telecommunications Society (Mastel) chairman Giri Suseno, during a hearing with House of Representatives Commission IV overseeing telecommunications, questioned the independence of the Telecommunications Regulatory Body (BRTI), as reported in The Jakarta Post, Dec. 4.",
        "content": "<p>Is BRTI independent?<\/p>\n<p>Indonesian Telecommunications Society (Mastel) chairman Giri<br>\nSuseno, during a hearing with House of Representatives Commission<br>\nIV overseeing telecommunications, questioned the independence of<br>\nthe Telecommunications Regulatory Body (BRTI), as reported in The<br>\nJakarta Post, Dec. 4.<\/p>\n<p>He said that under the current structure, the BRTI was weak,<br>\ngiven that the director general of post and telecommunications<br>\nDjamhari Sirat, as chairman of the body's regulatory committee,<br>\ncould influence the body's decision-making process.<\/p>\n<p>He also suggested the adoption of the Australian model for<br>\nregulatory bodies, which was flexible and applicable to<br>\nIndonesia, but he failed to provide details.<\/p>\n<p>I agree with him, as the dual role of Djamhari clearly<br>\nobstructs objectivity and independence.<\/p>\n<p>As for the Australian regulatory body model, it is called the<br>\nOffice of Regulator-General (ORG) and was established in 1994<br>\nunder ORG Act 1994 chaired by a regulator-general.<\/p>\n<p>The ORG does not regulate only a single public utility, but<br>\ncovers all utilities such as water, gas, railway system,<br>\nelectricity, port system and grain. Each of these utilities is<br>\nregulated under a separate act and an independent ORG.<\/p>\n<p>The above example is of the regulatory office in Victoria, one<br>\nof the six states of Australia. Telecommunications is not<br>\nincluded in the ORG's scope of work, because Australian<br>\ntelecommunications giant Telstra had been privatized before the<br>\nestablishment of the ORG. However, the thrust of the regulatory<br>\nframework is that the ORG is independent of the government, and<br>\nis accountable directly to the Australian parliament.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal to adopt the Australian model was indeed very<br>\nappropriate in the sense that the abovementioned utility sectors<br>\nare prone to price hikes at the expense of consumers.<\/p>\n<p>It was one day after July 17, 2003 -- which marked the day the<br>\nMinister of Communications Agum Gumelar inaugurated the long-<br>\nawaited telecommunications regulatory body -- Djamhari made a<br>\nstatement that astonished the general public, to the effect that<br>\nthe BRTI committee would soon raise telephone rates, something<br>\nthat went against public interests. This statement clearly showed<br>\nthe questionable independence of the regulatory body.<\/p>\n<p>M. RUSDI<br>\n Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/is-brti-independent-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}