{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1653978,
        "msgid": "iran-war-sparks-trumps-fury-at-nato-major-threat-looms-1775209850",
        "date": "2026-04-03 16:07:46",
        "title": "Iran War Sparks Trump's Fury at NATO, Major Threat Looms!",
        "author": "",
        "source": "CNBC",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Politics",
        "summary": "US President Donald Trump has expressed deep frustration with NATO over its refusal to deploy ships to the Strait of Hormuz amid the Iran conflict, threatening to withdraw from the alliance and questioning its future role. This rhetoric has heightened concerns among European allies about the erosion of transatlantic security guarantees, with analysts describing it as the worst crisis for NATO since its founding. While legal barriers prevent unilateral withdrawal, Trump's stance as commander-in-chief could undermine the alliance's mutual defence commitments, potentially reshaping 80 years of post-World War II cooperation.",
        "content": "<p>Relations between the US government and its NATO ally are currently\nstrained. US President Donald Trump is reportedly disappointed with NATO\nfor not sending ships to the Strait of Hormuz. Trump has even stated\nthat he is considering withdrawing from the alliance. \u201cWouldn\u2019t you do\nthe same if you were me?\u201d Trump asked, quoted from Reuters on Friday\n(3\/4\/2026). In his speech on Wednesday (1\/4\/2026) evening, Trump\ncriticised NATO. His comments have triggered unprecedented concerns that\nthe US will not assist European allies if they are attacked, regardless\nof whether Washington officially withdraws or not. As a result, analysts\nand diplomats see NATO, which has long served as the bedrock of European\nsecurity, as eroding, with the mutual defence treaty at its core no\nlonger considered a certainty. \u201cThis is the worst condition (for NATO)\nsince it was founded,\u201d said Max Bergmann, a former State Department\nofficial who now directs the Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Programme at\nthe Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, quoted\non Friday (3\/4\/2026). \u201cIt\u2019s very hard to think of anything that even\ncomes close to this,\u201d he added. As recently as February, NATO Secretary\nGeneral Mark Rutte dismissed the idea of Europe defending itself without\nthe US as \u201cfoolish thinking.\u201d Now, many officials and diplomats view it\nas a standard expectation. \u201cNATO is still necessary, but we must be able\nto think about NATO without America,\u201d said General Francois Lecointre,\nwho served as chief of the French armed forces from 2017 to 2021.\n\u201cWhether NATO should even continue to be called NATO - the North\nAtlantic Treaty Organization - is a valid question.\u201d White House\nspokesperson Anna Kelly said, \u201cPresident Trump has clearly expressed his\ndisappointment with NATO and other allies, and as the President has\nemphasised, \u2018The United States will remember it.\u2019\u201d This is not the first\ntime Trump has threatened to withdraw from NATO. During his first\nadministration, he also considered pulling out of the alliance. Trump is\nalso supported by officials who have expressed disappointment over what\nthey see as NATO\u2019s reluctance to help the United States when needed,\nincluding not directly assisting in the Strait of Hormuz and restricting\nthe use of some US airbases and airspace. US officials have stated that\nNATO cannot be a \u201cone-way street.\u201d European officials counter that they\nhave not received a US request for specific assets for the mission to\nopen the strait and complain that Washington has been inconsistent about\nwhether the mission would operate during or after the war. \u201cThis is a\nterrible situation for NATO,\u201d said Jamie Shea, a former senior NATO\nofficial who is now a senior researcher at the think tank Friends of\nEurope. \u201cThis is a blow to allies who, since Trump returned to the White\nHouse, have worked hard to show that they are willing and able to take\non more responsibility (for their own defence).\u201d Trump\u2019s latest comments\nfollow other signs of an increasingly unstable alliance. Nevertheless,\nlegally, Trump may not have the authority to withdraw from NATO. Under a\n2023 law, a US president cannot exit the alliance without two-thirds\napproval from the US Senate, a threshold that is nearly impossible. But\nanalysts say that, as commander-in-chief, Trump can decide whether the\nUS military will defend NATO members. Refusing to do so could jeopardise\nthe alliance without an official withdrawal. Next week, NATO Secretary\nGeneral Rutte, who has a strong relationship with Trump, is scheduled to\nvisit Washington in an effort to change Trump\u2019s view once again.\nAnalysts say European countries have good reason to remain engaged with\nthe US in NATO despite doubts about whether Trump would defend them.\nAmong other reasons, the US military provides a range of capabilities\nthat NATO cannot easily replace, such as satellite intelligence. Even if\nTrump and European countries find a way to stay together in NATO,\ndiplomats, analysts, and officials say the transatlantic alliance that\nhas been the centrepiece of the global order since the Second World War\nmay never be the same again. \u201cI think we are turning the page on 80\nyears of cooperation,\u201d said Julianne Smith, the US ambassador to NATO\nunder Democratic President Joe Biden, quoted on Friday (3\/4\/2026). \u201cI\ndon\u2019t think this means the end of the transatlantic relationship, but we\nare on the cusp of something that will have a different look and\nfeel.\u201d<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/iran-war-sparks-trumps-fury-at-nato-major-threat-looms-1775209850",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}