{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1482963,
        "msgid": "indonesia-wont-make-progress-without-agriculture-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-10-11 00:00:00",
        "title": "Indonesia won't make progress without agriculture",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Indonesia won't make progress without agriculture Hyginus Hardoyo, Jakarta Many have hopes that the next president of Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who has been awarded a doctorate in agricultural science, will work to promote the competitiveness of the farm sector.",
        "content": "<p>Indonesia won't make progress without agriculture<\/p>\n<p>Hyginus Hardoyo, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>Many have hopes that the next president of Indonesia, Susilo<br>\nBambang Yudhoyono, who has been awarded a doctorate in<br>\nagricultural science, will work to promote the competitiveness of<br>\nthe farm sector.<\/p>\n<p>Susilo, a retired Army general who holds an MA degree from<br>\nWebster University in the United States, successfully defended<br>\nhis dissertation on the development of rural areas and analysis<br>\nof fiscal policies at the Bogor Institute of Agriculture (IPB)<br>\nlate last month.<\/p>\n<p>In his thesis, Susilo asserted that fiscal and other policies,<br>\nincluding raising wages and lowering subsidies, could help boost<br>\nagricultural development and create new job opportunities.<\/p>\n<p>This news is comforting because Susilo, as the next president,<br>\nshould have the technical competence to analyze and resolve the<br>\ncountry's economic problems.<\/p>\n<p>Susilo should have a better perspective on how to develop<br>\nagriculture, the principal source of livelihood for the majority<br>\nof people, with the support of a competitive manufacturing<br>\nindustry.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia, basically an agrarian country, should command<br>\nstrong comparative advantages in farm commodities. Unfortunately,<br>\nhowever, it remains a major importer of rice, sugar, soybean,<br>\ncorn and many other food commodities.<\/p>\n<p>There have long been two schools of thought about appropriate<br>\ndevelopment strategies for this country. One of them advocates<br>\nleapfrogging straight to industrialization at the expense of<br>\nagriculture, while the other is in favor of focusing development<br>\non agriculture to support a competitive manufacturing sector.<\/p>\n<p>The latter school argues that for a country like Indonesia,<br>\nthe agricultural sector should be used as the basis for<br>\nsupporting industrialization. The agricultural sector could<br>\nproduce foodstuffs-- the basic needs of the people -- and at the<br>\nsame time function as an instrument for price stabilization.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia should have a comparative advantage in the<br>\nplantation (tree-crop) industry to generate the foreign exchange<br>\nthat is badly needed to import technology for the manufacturing<br>\nsector.<\/p>\n<p>Based on these arguments, the second school argues that<br>\nindustrialization in Indonesia will not succeed without a strong<br>\nagricultural sector.<\/p>\n<p>During Soeharto's New Order era, agricultural development was<br>\nput at the top of development programs, the backbone of the<br>\nnational economy. The adoption of this strategy temporarily ended<br>\nthe debate and controversy over the direction of the country's<br>\ndevelopment path.<\/p>\n<p>Among the remarkable advances achieved under this approach<br>\nwere self-sufficiency in rice in 1984, albeit heavily subsidized.<\/p>\n<p>However, with Indonesia's impressive economic growth<br>\neventually driven mostly by manufacturing and services, the<br>\nposition of agriculture in the economy declined, even though its<br>\ncontribution to total output is still significant.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the agriculture sector's share of gross domestic<br>\nproduct declined from over 50 percent of GDP in 1960 to only<br>\nabout 20 percent in 1997, when the economic crisis erupted.<\/p>\n<p>In general, however, agriculture was only able to grow based<br>\non protectionism, government intervention and a heavy dose of<br>\nsubsidies. Without these supports, agricultural development<br>\nslowed down and the bargaining power of farmers worsened<br>\nsteadily.<\/p>\n<p>Domestic farm commodities also become much less competitive.<br>\nSo, as Indonesia has begun to open its markets in line with trade<br>\nliberalization under the auspices of the World Trade<br>\nOrganization, local farm produce, such as rice and sugar, has<br>\nincreasingly been edged out of the market.<\/p>\n<p>However, when the financial crisis hit the country,<br>\nagriculture emerged as the savior of the economy, continuing to<br>\ngrow and absorb jobless workers that were thrown out of bankrupt<br>\nmanufacturing companies. As the costs of farm commodities are<br>\ndenominated entirely in rupiah, farm produce has benefited<br>\ngreatly from the steep depreciation of the local unit against the<br>\nAmerican dollar.<\/p>\n<p>This reinforced school of thought that supported agricultural<br>\ndevelopment, which had been neglected during the boom years of<br>\nmanufacturing industry before 1997.<\/p>\n<p>The agricultural sector, including fresh water and sea<br>\nfishing, and agrotourism, is now considered to be one of the<br>\nsectors with the most potential for accelerating economic growth.<\/p>\n<p>As an agrarian country in which more than 50 percent of the labor<br>\nforce still works in agriculture, Indonesia will not be able to<br>\nmake much progress in improving public welfare without rapid<br>\nagricultural development.<\/p>\n<p>However, without proper planning and strategic steps applied<br>\nconsistently to boosting food production, Indonesia will continue<br>\nto be a major net importer, a situation that could threaten the<br>\ncountry's national security.<\/p>\n<p>We have to realize that developed countries, which produce<br>\nlarge food surpluses, do not want Indonesia to be self-sufficient<br>\nin food. With its large population, Indonesia constitutes a large<br>\nmarket for heavily subsidized food products from the major<br>\nproducing countries.<\/p>\n<p>As things stand at the moment, most Indonesian farm products<br>\nare uncompetitive within the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA).<\/p>\n<p>In order to give agricultural development a clear direction,<br>\nthe new government needs to launch an integrated development<br>\nstrategy focused on food production.<\/p>\n<p>Susilo has partly answered those challenges through his<br>\npromise to use agriculture as a platform for the economic<br>\ndevelopment in the country during his term in office.<\/p>\n<p>It remains to be seen, however, whether Susilo will be able to<br>\nmake Indonesia competitive in the agricultural sector.<\/p>\n<p>The author is a staff writer for The Jakarta Post. He can be<br>\ncontacted at hardoyo@thejakartapost.com<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/indonesia-wont-make-progress-without-agriculture-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}