{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1066290,
        "msgid": "in-defense-of-justice-1447893297",
        "date": "1996-07-08 00:00:00",
        "title": "In defense of justice",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "In defense of justice Is the ax is about to fall on Adi Andojo Soetjipto, the deputy chief justice for criminal affairs who has been waging a lone crusade against collusion in the Supreme Court? On Friday, Minister\/State Secretary Moerdiono, confirming rumors of a move by Chief Justice Soerjono to have Adi removed, said President Soeharto has received a letter from the chief justice requesting that Justice Adi be discharged. The President, Moerdiono said, is \"seriously studying\" the request.",
        "content": "<p>In defense of justice<\/p>\n<p>Is the ax is about to fall on Adi Andojo Soetjipto, the deputy<br>\nchief justice for criminal affairs who has been waging a lone<br>\ncrusade against collusion in the Supreme Court? On Friday,<br>\nMinister\/State Secretary Moerdiono, confirming rumors of a move<br>\nby Chief Justice Soerjono to have Adi removed, said President<br>\nSoeharto has received a letter from the chief justice requesting<br>\nthat Justice Adi be discharged. The President, Moerdiono said, is<br>\n\"seriously studying\" the request.<\/p>\n<p>The 1985 law on the Supreme Court indeed empowers the<br>\nPresident to discharge, honorably or otherwise, members of the<br>\ncourt at the chief justice's recommendation. The grounds for<br>\ntermination may be at the request of the justice concerned, or<br>\nbecause of age (65 years old), physical illness, or an inability<br>\nto carry out duties.<\/p>\n<p>At this stage, it is not clear which of these reasons were<br>\ncited by Chief Justice Soerjono in his letter, but we can clearly<br>\nrule out own request, age and physical illness because Justice<br>\nAdi has not voiced a desire to step down, he is 64-years old and<br>\njudging by his many recent public appearances, he is healthy.<br>\nMoerdiono clearly stated that the request was for an honorable<br>\ndischarge rather than dishonorable as earlier rumors suggested.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever reasons cited by Soerjono and the nature of the<br>\nrequest, there is no doubt in anybody's mind of what lies behind<br>\nthe move: the row over possible collusion in the Supreme Court.<br>\nJustices Soerjono and Adi, perhaps the two most senior and<br>\nrespected serving judges in the country today, do not see eye to<br>\neye on the issue.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Adi was not satisfied with the way the chief justice<br>\ndealt with his complaint about alleged collusion in the court.<br>\nInsisting that collusion is rife, he warned that the reputation<br>\nand integrity of the court is at stake and demanded that<br>\nsomething be done at once.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Soerjono commissioned an investigation into a<br>\nparticular possible collusion case which was raised by Justice<br>\nAdi, and announced last month that there was not sufficient<br>\nevidence to support the allegation. He then declared the case<br>\nclosed, ignoring Justice Adi's protest about the way the<br>\ninvestigation was conducted. Later he ordered Justice Adi to<br>\ndesist in his allegations because by continuing and campaigning<br>\nfor action through the media, he was undermining the integrity of<br>\nthe court. The chief also threatened him with disciplinary<br>\naction.<\/p>\n<p>The public has become privy to an internal row in the<br>\ntraditionally tight-lipped Supreme Court. This is not the first<br>\ntime that allegations of corruption and collusion in the Supreme<br>\nCourt have been heard. What made this case different is that the<br>\nallegations were made by an insider, a very senior and respected<br>\nfigure in the court, making the allegations far more credible<br>\nthan any previous allegations.<\/p>\n<p>There is indeed a strong case to be made that the Supreme<br>\nCourt, being the last bastion of justice, should not be tainted<br>\nlest it lose public respect and trust. The judges serving in the<br>\ncourt were all selected from the best in the legal system, all<br>\nsupposedly with good track records. But judges are human beings,<br>\nwith all their frailties, and the court therefore is not a sacred<br>\ninstitution totally immune from public scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p>At a time when the country is striving to strengthen its legal<br>\nsystem, which is a prerequisite to democracy, introspection by<br>\nthe courts, from the lowest to the highest, is essential. Justice<br>\nAdi's move to cleanup the Supreme Court should be seen in this<br>\ncontext. It would be a tragic loss, not only for the Supreme<br>\nCourt, but also for the nation and democracy, if the request to<br>\ndischarge Justice Adi was approved. His actions may be unorthodox<br>\nand could undermine public trust in the Supreme Court, but if<br>\nthat is what it takes to clean up the court, then so be it. Only<br>\nthen can the court gain the trust and respect it is due.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/in-defense-of-justice-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}