{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1207013,
        "msgid": "implementing-youth-pledge-a-huge-task-1447893297",
        "date": "1995-10-28 00:00:00",
        "title": "Implementing Youth Pledge a huge task",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Implementing Youth Pledge a huge task Youth Pledge Day, which falls today, commemorates the historic event of 1928 when youths from different ethnic and religious backgrounds gathered in Jakarta and vowed to create a single nation, people and language. Does the event still ring bells and incite hope today? The Jakarta Post talks to Sartono Kartodirdjo about the significance of the event. Question: Is the youth pledge still relevant today?",
        "content": "<p>Implementing Youth Pledge a huge task<\/p>\n<p>Youth Pledge Day, which falls today, commemorates the historic<br>\nevent of 1928 when youths from different ethnic and religious<br>\nbackgrounds gathered in Jakarta and vowed to create a single<br>\nnation, people and language. Does the event still ring bells and<br>\nincite hope today? The Jakarta Post talks to Sartono Kartodirdjo<br>\nabout the significance of the event.<\/p>\n<p>Question: Is the youth pledge still relevant today?<\/p>\n<p>Answer: The principle of unity and nationalism stated in the<br>\n1925 Political Manifest in the Netherlands, as voiced by the<br>\nIndonesian Association and subsequently formulated in a more<br>\npopular way in the 1928 Youth Pledge, is still relevant in the<br>\ncurrent situation.<\/p>\n<p>The more so as nowadays there are things happening which tend<br>\nto go against the principles which were formulated by the<br>\nfounders of this republic.<\/p>\n<p>Q: In what way is it still relevant?<\/p>\n<p>A: The principle of unity is still relevant and should be re-<br>\nemphasized since matters related to unity and integrity give real<br>\ncause for concern.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, recently there has been a tendency toward<br>\nconflicts among ethnic groups. The people have begun to<br>\nunderstand the concept of democracy and want to experience<br>\ndemocratization for themselves. In relation to this, it has<br>\nbecome clear that our pluralistic community has inherent<br>\ndifferences, which are not conducive to institutionalizing the<br>\nprinciples of unity and nationalism overnight in the practice of<br>\n\"live and let live\". All of that requires a process.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Where do the difficulties lie?<\/p>\n<p>A: The difficulties lie in turning those principles into real<br>\nlife values. It is up to the authorities now to strike a balance<br>\nto achieve this. Man has always been obsessed with striking a<br>\nbalance between order and freedom. We oscillate between the two<br>\nthings. Without order we would live in anarchy. So, order is<br>\nindeed necessary for stability and development. On the other<br>\nhand, there is man's basic need for freedom. An artist without<br>\nfreedom will not be creative. The same applies to a scientist.<br>\nInstinctively man has always strived for freedom. The important<br>\nthing now is how to balance these two elements in our society.<br>\nThis is the task of the politicians and the authorities.<\/p>\n<p>Q: How do you see the emergence in recent years of so many<br>\norganizations of intellectuals that seem to compete with each<br>\nother?<\/p>\n<p>A: The existence of organizations of intellectuals which tend<br>\nto try to eliminate each other has roots in associations based on<br>\nsectarian groupings. A professional organization should actually<br>\nbe adequate for intellectuals. For me, the Indonesian Historians'<br>\nAssociation is sufficient. It is an organization to forge<br>\nsolidarity with my friends of the same profession.<\/p>\n<p>Professionalism does not require an organization which is<br>\nsectarian in nature.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed the community has an aspect of multi-dimensional<br>\nexistence, so that there is a great possibility for the<br>\nestablishment of a group with numerous dimensions; economic,<br>\nsocial, political or cultural. As long as this is not mixed with<br>\npolitics this kind of diversity is nothing extraordinary. So, it<br>\nwould be best for intellectuals to join professional<br>\norganizations to promote their professional functions.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Is nationalism still an issue today?<\/p>\n<p>A: Nowadays we still need to strengthen the spirit of<br>\nnationalism. It is true that national unity, solidarity and<br>\nfreedom have materialized but the situation is still far from<br>\nperfect. Now, a variety of initiatives have come to the surface,<br>\nall are linked up to a single interpretation of historical<br>\nprocess.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Would a second Youth Pledge be necessary?<\/p>\n<p>A: We should not busy ourselves with things like gatherings<br>\nwithout taking some tangible actions. The values of unity and<br>\nnationalism should be inculcated through the institutionalizing<br>\nof those values. Will a second Youth Pledge work? There is an<br>\nalternative. But it is a gigantic task. (02)<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Sartono Kartodirdjo is professor of history at the<br>\nUniversity of Gadjah Mada in Yogyakarta.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/implementing-youth-pledge-a-huge-task-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}