{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1306087,
        "msgid": "house-yet-to-give-support-to-plan-to-revise-msaa-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-08-10 00:00:00",
        "title": "House yet to give support to plan to revise MSAA",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "House yet to give support to plan to revise MSAA JAKARTA (JP): The House of Representatives would only support the government's plan to revise an earlier agreement with former bank owners after a thorough study has been completed, according to House Speaker Akbar Tandjung. Akbar said on Wednesday that the government had agreed to form a joint investigation team with the House to study the controversial agreement called the Master of Settlement and Acquisition Agreement (MSAA).",
        "content": "<p>House yet to give support to plan to revise MSAA<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): The House of Representatives would only support<br>\nthe government's plan to revise an earlier agreement with former<br>\nbank owners after a thorough study has been completed, according<br>\nto House Speaker Akbar Tandjung.<\/p>\n<p>Akbar said on Wednesday that the government had agreed to form<br>\na joint investigation team with the House to study the<br>\ncontroversial agreement called the Master of Settlement and<br>\nAcquisition Agreement (MSAA).<\/p>\n<p>\"The government has said that it plans to revise the MSAA...<br>\nBut the House needs more time to study it first before we can<br>\ncome up with our final say,\" he told reporters in a joint press<br>\nconference with Finance Minister Bambang Sudibyo.<\/p>\n<p>\"The proposed revision will be a valuable input for us,\" he<br>\nadded.<\/p>\n<p>He said that the team would work over the next two to three<br>\nweeks, but didn't give any deadline.<\/p>\n<p>The government, represented by Bambang, met with the House in<br>\nan apparent bid to seek support for its bid to force the powerful<br>\nand influential former bank owners to completely repay their<br>\nmulti-billion dollar debt to the government.<\/p>\n<p>The MSAA agreement was made during the previous administration<br>\nof president B.J. Habibie.  Under the agreement, former owners of<br>\nfour private banks were allowed to surrender assets to the<br>\nIndonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA) to repay their debts.<br>\nThe banks included nationalized Bank Central Asia (BCA), the now<br>\ndefunct Bank Dagang Nasional Indonesia (BDNI), Bank Umum Nasional<br>\n(BUN) UN and Bank Subentra.<\/p>\n<p>The government, through the central bank, injected more than<br>\nRp 100 trillion in emergency liquidity support loans to the four<br>\nbanks during the peak of the country's financial crisis to<br>\nbailout the banks amid massive bank runs in 1998 and 1999.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to the MSAA, IBRA signed another less<br>\ncontroversial agreement called the Master of Refinancing<br>\nAgreement (MRA) with another group of former bank owners.<\/p>\n<p>Coordinating Minister for Economy, Finance and Industry Kwik<br>\nKian Gie was the first to raise the controversy surrounding the<br>\nMSAA.  He said late last month that the present value of the<br>\nassets was much lower than the total obligations of the former<br>\nbank owners.<\/p>\n<p>Kwik said that the MSAA must be revised because under the<br>\nagreement it was the government which would cover any commercial<br>\nloss if the realized value of the assets turn out to be lower<br>\nthan the debt.<\/p>\n<p>Kwik pointed out as an example that the Salim Group, the<br>\nformer owner of BCA, had total debt of around Rp 52 trillion, but<br>\nthe more than 100 companies surrendered to IBRA are now only<br>\nworth around Rp 20 trillion, leaving the government and tax<br>\npayers to cover the difference.<\/p>\n<p>Bambang said that there were three main reasons why the MSAA<br>\nmust be revised.<\/p>\n<p>Firstly, the agreement was legally defective, benefiting the<br>\nformer bank owners at the expense of the government.<\/p>\n<p>\"It is an uneven agreement,\" Bambang said.<\/p>\n<p>\"Secondly, we have observed that the debtors have not complied<br>\neven to this inequitable agreement,\" he said.<\/p>\n<p>\"And thirdly, there is evidence that the agreement was not<br>\nbased on good faith (of the former bank owners),\" he added.<\/p>\n<p>\"These reasons are enough to justify revision of the MSAA,\"<br>\nBambang said.<\/p>\n<p>He also said that according to his personal opinion, the<br>\nformer bank owners should be held responsible for any crimes they<br>\ncommitted in relation to the channeling of the liquidity supports<br>\neven if they have surrendered assets to repay their debts to the<br>\ngovernment.<\/p>\n<p>He said that the original MSAA tended to compromise banking<br>\ncrimes of the past.<\/p>\n<p>An audit made by the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) revealed that<br>\nout of the Rp 144.5 trillion of the emergency liquidity support<br>\ninjected to 48 commercial banks, some Rp 138.4 trillion had been<br>\nmisused. BPK said that instead of repaying depositors, the banks<br>\nused the cheap loans for currency speculation or lending to<br>\naffiliated business groups, raising the possibility that the<br>\nbanks had breached the legal lending limit. (rei)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/house-yet-to-give-support-to-plan-to-revise-msaa-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}