Leaders and members of the House of Representatives (DPR) Commission\nIX have criticised the Unqualified Opinion (WTP) obtained by the\nNational Nutrition Agency (BGN) for its 2025 financial report. They\nquestioned how the opinion aligns with the agency\u2019s budget\nabsorption.<\/p>\n
The first criticism came from Commission IX member Muazzim Akbar, who\neven accused the WTP achieved by BGN in 2025 of being fabricated. \u201cBGN\nis extraordinary, so we need a serious discussion today. First, I would\nlike to respond to the fact that it has received a WTP, but the average\nbudget realisation is only 59 percent. How can it be WTP but the budget\nrealisation is only that much? Perhaps the WTP was fabricated,\u201d Muazzim\nsaid during a meeting with BGN at Commission IX of the DPR, Senayan,\nJakarta, Friday (17\/7\/2026).<\/p>\n
Criticism also came from another Commission IX member, Netty\nPrasetiyani. She urged BGN not to be satisfied with the WTP achieved in\n2025. \u201cFrom the presentation, I see that we should not only be satisfied\nwith the Unqualified Opinion obtained by BGN, but we need confirmation\nof the programme\u2019s performance achievements within the community,\u201d Netty\nstated.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, Commission IX member Heru Tjahjono also highlighted the\nWTP opinion obtained by BGN. He requested that the notes accompanying\nthe WTP be resolved by the agency. \u201cMrs Arum used to be at BPKP. In our\nview, when you get a WTP, if I recall correctly, there was an interim\naudit in November, findings were corrected in January, the interim was\ncorrected, then a detailed examination in the third interim. After that,\nnotes emerged in the Audit Result Report that must be resolved within 30\ndays times two, so 60 days,\u201d Heru said. He urged BGN to pay attention to\nthese notes. \u201cWhat we mean is, regarding this WTP, if we look at the\nreport you presented, there are arrears, there is carry-over, there are\npayments that must be made next year, including notes. I am not asking\nabout the notes, Mr Trenggono, but please resolve the notes quickly so\nthe issues are settled,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Further notes for BGN came from the Deputy Chairperson of Commission\nIX, Yahya Zaini. He questioned the basis for granting the WTP opinion to\nBGN. \u201cI question this, what is the basis for BGN receiving a WTP?\u201d Yahya\npressed. He was puzzled because BGN\u2019s budget absorption was only 60\npercent. Additionally, Yahya highlighted that BGN did not include notes\nfrom the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). \u201cMeanwhile, the absorption is only\n60 percent and there are many problematic findings in it, such as the\nprocurement of electric motors and so on,\u201d Yahya said. \u201cUsually, every\nBPK examination has notes, notes as a follow-up to findings obtained\nfrom the examination or audit. Here, it is not mentioned, the findings\nare not presented. In other ministries and institutions, they are\nusually presented, Madam, regarding assets, programmes, and so on,\u201d he\nadded.<\/p>", "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/house-commission-ix-leaders-and-members-question-bgns-unqualified-opinion-on-2025-budget-1784289281", "image": "" }, "sponsor": "Okusi Associates", "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com" }