{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1550389,
        "msgid": "helping-small-firms-1447893297",
        "date": "1997-07-12 00:00:00",
        "title": "Helping small firms",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Helping small firms The government is going full steam ahead to accelerate the development of small enterprises. In addition to the numerous small business development programs already underway, a special regulation is now being drafted which will oblige big companies bidding for government procurement contracts to partner with small firms.",
        "content": "<p>Helping small firms<\/p>\n<p>The government is going full steam ahead to accelerate the<br>\ndevelopment of small enterprises. In addition to the numerous<br>\nsmall business development programs already underway, a special<br>\nregulation is now being drafted which will oblige big companies<br>\nbidding for government procurement contracts to partner with<br>\nsmall firms. The number of small businesses or cooperatives in<br>\npartnership with big companies will be stipulated as one of the<br>\nrequirements to be fulfilled for winning government procurement<br>\ndeals.<\/p>\n<p>But we wonder how the upcoming regulation, which is to be<br>\nsigned by the President, will be more effective than<br>\nPresidential Decrees No.16\/1994 and No. 24\/1995 regarding the<br>\nsame matter. State Minister of Cooperatives and Small Enterprises<br>\nSubiakto Tjakrawerdaya acknowledged many government procurement<br>\ncontracts, which by regulation should have been awarded to small<br>\nfirms, were often given to big enterprises. He said many tenders<br>\nfor government contracts had been deliberately engineered so that<br>\nthey would go to particular companies. Despite these blatant<br>\nviolations, officials are rarely taken to court on charges of<br>\nabusing government contracts.<\/p>\n<p>Governments often use preferential treatment under the state<br>\nbudget spending as a tool to help develop small firms. Even the<br>\nSmall Business Administration in the United States, known for its<br>\nfull-blown liberal economy, provides preferential treatment to<br>\nsmall enterprises bidding for government procurement contracts.<br>\nThe program in that capitalist country has been successful in<br>\ndeveloping small firms to become medium-sized ones and incubating<br>\nmicro-enterprises to become competitive small businesses.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesian government procurements of goods and services<br>\ncould contribute to accelerating the development of small<br>\nbusinesses. For the current 1997\/1998 fiscal year, government<br>\nprocurements of goods and services have been allocated Rp 8.8<br>\ntrillion (US$3.5 billion) of the operating budget, up 35 percent<br>\nfrom Rp 6.5 trillion last year.<\/p>\n<p>The concept of the programs in the U.S. and Indonesia is by<br>\nand large similar in that small firms are given price preferences<br>\nand more lenient payment terms, compared to those imposed on big<br>\nbidders. But the big difference lies in the implementation or,<br>\nmore importantly, in the quality of the executors, meaning good<br>\nand effective governance. And this, as Subiakto himself<br>\nacknowledged, has been the very factor missing from the<br>\nenforcement of previous regulations favoring small businesses.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the annual findings of the Development Finance<br>\nComptroller and Supreme Audit Agency have shown that malfeasance<br>\nin government procurement contracts has been one of the most<br>\nfrequently committed violations of the state budget procedures.<br>\nSo pervasive has corruption been within government procurements<br>\nthat a former director general of state companies once said that<br>\nthe first thing one should do to improve the public sector's<br>\nefficiency was thoroughly audit procurement contracts and examine<br>\nthe suppliers to government offices and state enterprises.<\/p>\n<p>Judging by the failure of the previous rulings, the new<br>\nregulation would be effective only if the government is more<br>\nvigorous and consistent in ensuring a transparent mechanism for<br>\nawarding contracts and in dealing firmly with officials who abuse<br>\nthe tendering procedures. If the enforcement continues to be void<br>\nof malfeasance, the new regulation would benefit mostly fly-by-<br>\nnight small firms which are sponsored by politically influential<br>\npeople or officials in charge of government procurements.<\/p>\n<p>The government should also see to it that the business tie-<br>\nups between big companies and their small-business partners<br>\nshould be based on long-term operations and not on ad hoc<br>\narrangements simply to win particular contracts. Of no less<br>\nimportance, despite the noble objective of developing small<br>\nenterprises, is to ensure that contracts are always awarded on<br>\nthe basis of economic criteria. If not, government procurements<br>\nwould be rendered grossly inefficient and ineffective in<br>\nnurturing competitive small businesses.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/helping-small-firms-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}