{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1137620,
        "msgid": "greater-self-confidence-and-the-need-for-1447893297",
        "date": "2005-12-24 00:00:00",
        "title": "Greater self-confidence and the need for",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Greater self-confidence and the need for cogent foreign policy approach: Outlook for 2006 Bantarto Bandoro Jakarta A free and active (proactive) foreign policy has characterized Indonesia since its independence. This basic policy has shown a remarkable degree of resilience and adaptability. It will remain so in the future.",
        "content": "<p>Greater self-confidence and the need for<br>\ncogent foreign policy approach: Outlook for 2006<\/p>\n<p>Bantarto Bandoro<br>\nJakarta<\/p>\n<p>A free and active (proactive) foreign policy has characterized <br>\nIndonesia since its independence. This basic policy has shown a <br>\nremarkable degree of resilience and adaptability. It will remain <br>\nso in the future.<\/p>\n<p>When Susilo came into power one year ago, he not only <br>\nreiterated the importance of that basic policy for our foreign <br>\nrelations, but also inherited internal as well as external  <br>\nconditions in which our foreign policy needs to be adjusted.<\/p>\n<p>The foreign policy challenges that Indonesia, under Susilo,  <br>\nface are quite immense, particularly as we try to improve our <br>\nimage abroad and experience enormous transformations in the <br>\nglobal system .<\/p>\n<p>Susilo, who appeared to take a direct role in foreign policy <br>\nexecution, seems to have been able to grasp the essence of our <br>\nforeign relations, particularly when the country was facing <br>\nexternal and internal pressures to move faster in its <br>\ndemocratization process, economic recovery and fight against <br>\nterrorism.<\/p>\n<p>We are confronted with three options: to be part of, follow or <br>\nlead the change. We surely cannot only be a follower, nor stand <br>\nidly by, in the changed world. The country should be able to lead <br>\non certain issues in international relations.<\/p>\n<p>Because we want to be part of the changes, in a way that <br>\nbenefits the country, and lead on certain issues, at least <br>\nregionally, Susilo convinced the public of the importance of  <br>\ninternational links for the solution of our domestic problems and <br>\nthe promotion of the country's national interests.<\/p>\n<p>It was an Indonesian idea that participation in the East Asian <br>\nSummit should be enlarged to include India, Australia and New <br>\nZealand. A series of strategic regional policies has also been <br>\ntabled by Indonesia, some of which have been realized through  <br>\nconcrete action plans, such as the ASEAN Security Community.<\/p>\n<p>The success of our democratic process has, at least for now,  <br>\nbeen quite instrumental in moving toward a more satisfactory <br>\nforeign policy agenda, namely greater confidence in being a <br>\nprominent, if not key player, at a regional and global level. <br>\nThis confidence will shape the content and direction of our <br>\nforeign policy.<\/p>\n<p>On a bilateral level, we saw the government give first, if not <br>\nhighest priority, to developing friendly and mutually beneficial  <br>\nrelations with all our neighbors.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, Indonesia is also stepping up significantly  <br>\nits engagement with major powers. Indonesia's relationship with <br>\nthe U.S., for example, is changing in response to the dynamics <br>\noperating in the two countries, as well as regionally and <br>\nglobally, particularly the fight against global terrorism.<\/p>\n<p>In just one year, our relationship with the U.S. has developed <br>\nsignificantly at many levels.<\/p>\n<p>The lifting of the arms embargo by the U.S. government  was <br>\nseen as a clear path toward the normalization of bilateral <br>\nrelations between the two countries, particularly in the realm of  <br>\nthe military.<\/p>\n<p>One should and will not see our relation with the U.S. in the <br>\ncontext of any other country or regional equation or even <br>\nalliance system, nor is the relationship going to be at the <br>\nexpense of any other relationship valued by this country. Meaning <br>\nthat the maintenance of Indonesia's relations with Japan, China, <br>\nRussia and other major countries in Europe is as important as our <br>\nrelations with the U.S.<\/p>\n<p>So, how then should we frame a progressive foreign policy for  <br>\n2006 and where should we start? Given the perceived gains -- <br>\npolitically as well as economically and strategically --  the <br>\ncountry received from the changed  environment, it is not wrong <br>\nto assume that the  profile mentioned above has, to a certain <br>\ndegree, contributed to the success of our foreign policy. Such  <br>\nsuccess may have began with our top leaders' comprehensive <br>\nunderstanding of the particular challenges of the day.<\/p>\n<p>The year 2006, and perhaps beyond, will see even more severe <br>\nchallenges faced by our foreign policy as our immediate region in <br>\nparticular moves into an integrated region, exemplified by the <br>\nEast Asian Community and ASEAN Community.<\/p>\n<p>Free trade areas formed by ASEAN-China, ASEAN-Japan and ASEAN-<br>\nIndia will soon be in place.  Moreover, terrorism is a real <br>\nthreat and a present danger that we must confront and defeat. <br>\nThus, our foreign policy will succeed or fail according to how <br>\nwell the country copes with this era's diverse security and <br>\neconomic challenges.<\/p>\n<p>Given the major policy initiatives Indonesia has taken <br>\nrecently toward its immediate region, Asia, it is not wrong to <br>\nsuggest that the sub-region, Southeast and Northeast Asia in <br>\nparticular, has been and will continue to be the central focus  <br>\nof, and arena for, our international diplomacy. The consequences <br>\nfor Indonesia in the years ahead are to design some sort of Asian <br>\nstrategy, one that offers programs and strategic direction as to <br>\nhow our foreign policy should deal with every day  as well as <br>\nunexpected political events that might occur in the region of <br>\nAsia.<\/p>\n<p>Next year we will also see more intensive diplomatic <br>\ninteraction and transactions among the countries in the Asian <br>\nregion due to their commitment to creating a kind of regional <br>\npool for peace and prosperity. As an influential member of ASEAN, <br>\nIndonesia is committed to playing a part in such a process. But <br>\nIndonesian foreign policy should not be \"too regionalistic\"  in a <br>\nway that ignores other major regional security-related issues <br>\nthat affect our foreign policy, such as the environment, <br>\nterrorism, drug trafficking and people smuggling, to mention a <br>\nfew.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, what we need perhaps is a considered and reasoned <br>\napproach -- an approach that might evolve into a kind of a <br>\ndoctrine -- to help our diplomats navigate the country's foreign <br>\npolicy in a much more challenging and globalized world. The <br>\nquestion is what do we need a doctrine for?<\/p>\n<p>A doctrine not only gives overall direction to our foreign <br>\npolicy, but it also helps establish basic foreign policy <br>\npriorities, particularly when we are in need of long-term <br>\ncertainty and stability in our economic development and in <br>\nmaintaining our international role. Susilo is quite visionary in <br>\nthis matter, suggesting that the country should play an active <br>\nand catalytic role if Indonesia is to maintain its independence <br>\nand diplomatic gains.<\/p>\n<p>A doctrine, if it is ever to be of any value, could help shape <br>\nand direct the allocation of resources. It would also signal to <br>\nour neighboring countries, to our legislative members and public <br>\nat home, where our policies are heading, what they will entail, <br>\nand what can be expected in the future regarding Indonesia's <br>\ninternational role. A doctrine thus offers strategic clarity.<\/p>\n<p>With its new profile and intention to be in the lead of <br>\ncertain international issues, it is especially important for <br>\nIndonesia to have a cogent foreign policy approach. Indonesia <br>\nalso needs constant adjustment to reflect the realities of today <br>\nand tomorrow's challenges.<\/p>\n<p>A clear-sighted  view of the country's national interests is <br>\ntherefore needed if Indonesia is to successfully navigate new <br>\nregional security and economic issues, while also addressing its <br>\nrelations with other parts of the globe. The regional and global <br>\ncomplexities of the 21st century demand strategic, over-the-<br>\nhorizon Indonesian thinking. This will, of course, require <br>\ncreative and bold diplomacy.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is the director of scientific infrastructure and <br>\npublications, and the chief editor of The Indonesian Quarterly, <br>\nat the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Jakarta. <br>\nHe is also a lecturer in the International Relations Graduate <br>\nProgram at the School of Social and Political Sciences, the <br>\nUniversity of Indonesia. He can be reached at bandoro@csis.or.id.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/greater-self-confidence-and-the-need-for-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}