{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1232898,
        "msgid": "grants-and-debt-swaps-should-be-explored-in-bali-summit-1447893297",
        "date": "2002-06-04 00:00:00",
        "title": "Grants and debt swaps should be explored in Bali Summit",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Grants and debt swaps should be explored in Bali Summit Bahtiar Arif, Center for Indonesia Reform, Lecturer, University of Pancasila, Jakarta, bahtiararif@yahoo.com The preparatory meeting for the World Summit on Sustainable Development is currently taking place in Bali. The Bali meeting will draw a final draft which will be brought to Johannesburg where the summit will run from Aug. 26 to Sept. 4.",
        "content": "<p>Grants and debt swaps should be explored in Bali Summit<\/p>\n<p>Bahtiar Arif, Center for Indonesia Reform, Lecturer, University<br>\nof Pancasila, Jakarta, bahtiararif@yahoo.com<\/p>\n<p>The preparatory meeting for the World Summit on Sustainable<br>\nDevelopment is currently taking place in Bali.<\/p>\n<p>The Bali meeting will draw a final draft which will be brought<br>\nto Johannesburg where the summit will run from Aug. 26 to Sept.<br>\n4.<\/p>\n<p>The main agenda of the Summit is to push for a sustainable<br>\ndevelopment agenda that calls for improving the independent<br>\nrelationship between people and the environment and to address<br>\nthe needs of the more than one billion people who presently lack<br>\naccess to clean water, sanitation and modern energy services.<\/p>\n<p>Implementation of the agendas will be focused on building<br>\npartnerships between government and private sectors, known as<br>\nPublic-Private-Partnership (PPP).<\/p>\n<p>As Nittin Desai, Secretary General of the Summit, said: The<br>\ngovernment cannot fight poverty and protect the environment<br>\nalone, so it is important to build a partnership.<\/p>\n<p>The Bali meeting will discuss and formulate the partnership<br>\ninitiatives, and the results will be submitted for further<br>\nconsideration and adoption at the Summit.<\/p>\n<p>But, who truly gains from the sustainable development agenda?<br>\nHow effective do the partnership initiatives need to be to obtain<br>\nthe objectives? Are poverty alleviation and environmental<br>\nprotection the main and sincere agendas?<\/p>\n<p>The sustainable development promoted by the United Nations<br>\nWorld Commission on Environment and Development (UNWCED) and<br>\nbased on the Brundtland Report has challenged the development<br>\nideology which primarily focuses on economic growth without<br>\nconsideration for the environment or human matters.<\/p>\n<p>The premise is to design and implement &quot;safe&quot; development<br>\nprograms in terms of environment and human matters.<\/p>\n<p>However, the costs involved to save our planet will be<br>\nexpensive in monetary terms.<\/p>\n<p>Even for developing countries burdened by huge amounts of<br>\ndebt, it will be difficult to finance such development programs.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, a private finance initiative may be the best<br>\nalternative to finance the sustainable development program.<\/p>\n<p>If the proposal for a private finance initiative is agreed<br>\nupon, private sectors, which have sufficient funds, will obtain<br>\nthe projects.<\/p>\n<p>They have enough funds to be used for such programs. But, it<br>\nis common in the private sector that profits come first. Based on<br>\nthe UK&apos;s experience, there has been &quot;a hidden subsidy&quot; from the<br>\ngovernment budget to the private sector. For profitability<br>\nreasons, the private sector intentionally re-treats some<br>\nunfinished projects, so that the government is obliged to give &quot;a<br>\nhidden subsidy&quot; to the private sector to finish the projects.<\/p>\n<p>Second, which countries have multinational enterprises ready<br>\nfor such an initiative? Developed or developing economies? If<br>\nfirms in developing countries are not ready to participate in the<br>\ninitiative, those from the developed countries will seize the<br>\nopportunity -- and therefore, there will profit from the<br>\ncompensation from recipient countries for the initiative. There<br>\nwill be two questions: Who will guarantee that no &quot;hidden<br>\nsubsidies&quot; will occur and how effective will this make the<br>\noverall sustainable development program?<\/p>\n<p>Sustainable development has affected countries to obtain<br>\nsustainable growth. In developing countries, some development<br>\nprograms supported by the international agencies -- the World<br>\nBank and IMF, have been designed and implemented. However,<br>\npoverty alleviation and other human development have not been<br>\ngood. In addition, environmental destruction such as pollution,<br>\nlack of clean water, deforestation are by-products of the World<br>\nBank and IMF programs.<\/p>\n<p>Then, who should be responsible? It is not only the<br>\nresponsibility of the private sector or governments, but all<br>\npeople. All humans -- in developed and in developing countries --<br>\nlive on the same planet. Environmental destruction in some<br>\ncountries will usually affect others. So, saving the earth is not<br>\nsolely the responsibility of any particular country.<\/p>\n<p>Poverty, uneducated people, pollution, floods, lack access to<br>\nclean water, sanitation and modern energy services are all of our<br>\nproblems, both rich and poor countries. In the global society, it<br>\nis thus the main responsibility of the rich countries. It is<br>\nimportant to know the motives of transferring their money to poor<br>\ncountries whether for a moral reason or an economic\/political<br>\nreason.<\/p>\n<p>Two alternatives may be better than private finance<br>\ninitiatives. First, financing environmental and human development<br>\nprojects must be done with more grants from rich countries to<br>\npoor countries. The commitments of the rich countries to save the<br>\nearth and its people should be proven by giving more money for<br>\nsustainable development to poor countries. This is a moral<br>\nobligation for the rich, that will not necessitate Mahatir-style<br>\n(Malaysian Prime Minister) radical ideas of taxing the rich<br>\npeople in poor countries, because such a tax would be rejected by<br>\nthose rich people.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the rich countries and international organizations can<br>\nask indebted countries to redirect their debt repayment<br>\nallocations in their respective state budgets for sustainable<br>\ndevelopment programs. This can be done by swapping debts for<br>\nnature and human development as has been suggested of late.<\/p>\n<p>More grants from the rich countries and debt swaps may be<br>\nbetter alternatives than a private finance initiative.<br>\nDelegations who are preparing for the Summit need to consider<br>\nthese alternatives to save our planet and people. Hopefully the<br>\nSummit will sincerely push for these objectives -- with a &quot;shadow<br>\nagenda&quot;, especially from the rich countries.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/grants-and-debt-swaps-should-be-explored-in-bali-summit-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}