{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1262943,
        "msgid": "govt-considers-revoking-visa-free-facility-1447893297",
        "date": "2002-08-31 00:00:00",
        "title": "Govt considers revoking visa-free facility",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Govt considers revoking visa-free facility Rendi A. Witular The Jakarta Post Jakarta The Directorate General of Immigration has proposed the abolition of the visa-free facility currently extended to the nationals of 48 countries, a move which tourism experts said would hurt the already embattled industry.",
        "content": "<p>Govt considers revoking visa-free facility<\/p>\n<p>Rendi A. Witular<br>\nThe Jakarta Post<br>\nJakarta<\/p>\n<p>The Directorate General of Immigration has proposed the  <br>\nabolition of the visa-free facility currently extended to the <br>\nnationals of 48 countries, a move which tourism experts said <br>\nwould hurt the already embattled industry.<\/p>\n<p>According to a draft of the proposal seen by The Jakarta Post <br>\non Friday, the facility will only be given to nationals of 14 <br>\ncountries, mostly consisting of the ASEAN member countries, while <br>\ncitizens from 38 other countries, including the U.S., Japan, <br>\nAustralia, the Netherlands, Germany, France, United Kingdom, <br>\nTaiwan and South Korea would no longer be entitled to the <br>\nfacility starting next year.<\/p>\n<p>ASEAN stands for the Association of South East Asian Nations.<\/p>\n<p>The visa-free facility, first introduced in 1983, was meant to <br>\nlure more foreign tourists to the country.  Under the scheme, <br>\nforeign tourists visiting the country for a two-month period are <br>\nnot required to possess a visa.<\/p>\n<p>But the immigration office argues that the facility has often <br>\nbeen abused by foreign visitors to work in the country illegally <br>\nor conduct other non tourism-related activities.<\/p>\n<p>Another reason given is the reciprocity issue. Many Indonesian <br>\ncitizens face difficulties in obtaining visas from countries that <br>\nhave been enjoying Indonesia's visa-free facility.<\/p>\n<p>A source at the immigration office said that the privilege <br>\nshould only be given to countries that were willing to provide <br>\nthe same facility for Indonesian citizens.<\/p>\n<p>He added that the plan was currently being discussed with <br>\nother institutions, including the Ministry of Culture and <br>\nTourism, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the National <br>\nPolice.<\/p>\n<p>To plan is actually not a new one.  In late 1999, the <br>\ngovernment was also considering abolishing the facility arguing <br>\nthat it had brought about severe negative consequences for the <br>\ncountry, including increased drug smuggling and a growing number <br>\nof illegal workers.<\/p>\n<p>Another source said that the country's intelligence services <br>\nhad also been demanding that the government abolish the free-visa <br>\nfacility as it had been misused by members of foreign non-<br>\ngovernmental organizations visiting the country for political <br>\npurposes, thus threatening domestic security.<\/p>\n<p>The country's tourism industry deplored the plan to abolish <br>\nthe scheme, arguing it would only serve to further damage a <br>\ntourism sector struggling to recover from the impact of the late <br>\n1990s twin political and economic crises as well as from the <br>\neffects of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.<\/p>\n<p>Meity Robot, president of the central board of the Indonesian <br>\nTour and Travel Agencies Association (ASITA), said that if the <br>\nplan was realized it would significantly reduce the number of <br>\nforeign tourists coming to the country, forcing many travel <br>\nagencies to shut up shop.<\/p>\n<p>She said that the country could lose a huge amount of foreign <br>\nexchange earnings, pointing out that one tourist on average spent <br>\nUS$1,000 during a 10-day stay here.<\/p>\n<p>Meity suggested that instead of completely revoking the <br>\nfacility, the government could instead reduce the length of the <br>\npermitted visa-free stay from 60 days to 30 days.<\/p>\n<p>She said that the average length of stay for foreign tourists <br>\nhere was between 10 and 12 days.<\/p>\n<p>Meity said that the association had been informed about the <br>\nplan, and that Minister of Culture and Tourism I Gede Ardika had <br>\nsent a letter a week ago informing the association that the <br>\nministry would propose a reduction in the length of stay instead <br>\nof completely abolishing the scheme.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia is currently lagging behind in attracting foreign <br>\ntourists compared to neighboring countries like Malaysia and <br>\nThailand, which in 2001 respectively saw some 12.7 million and <br>\n10.4 million foreign tourist arrivals.<\/p>\n<p>By comparison, only 5.1 million foreign tourists visited <br>\nIndonesia, of which 2 million came from the South East Asian <br>\ncountries. <br>\n <br>\nEyebox<\/p>\n<p>Countries to be granted visa free facility in 2003<\/p>\n<p>1.  Singapore<br>\n2.  Malaysia<br>\n3.  Thailand<br>\n4.  Philippine<br>\n5.  Brunei Darussalam<br>\n6.  Hongkong S.A.R<br>\n7.  Turkey<br>\n8.  Tanzania<br>\n9.  Peru<br>\n10. Morocco<br>\n11. Malta<br>\n12. Guam<br>\n13. Fiji<br>\n14. Chile<\/p>\n<p>Source: the Directorate General of Immigration of the Ministry of <br>\nJustice and Human Right<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/govt-considers-revoking-visa-free-facility-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}