{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1544027,
        "msgid": "government-urged-to-draft-law-on-cross-ownership-1447893297",
        "date": "1997-08-29 00:00:00",
        "title": "Government urged to draft law on cross ownership",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Government urged to draft law on cross ownership JAKARTA (JP): The government should draft a new law to regulate cross shareholding through corporate restructuring, which has become a trend among conglomerates, lawyer Sofyan A. Djalil suggested. Sofyan, managing partner at Sofyan Djalil & Partners law firm, said the recent cross shareholders-driven restructuring by the Salim and Lippo groups should encourage the government to regulate such practices.",
        "content": "<p>Government urged to draft law on cross ownership<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): The government should draft a new law to<br>\nregulate cross shareholding through corporate restructuring,<br>\nwhich has become a trend among conglomerates, lawyer Sofyan A.<br>\nDjalil suggested.<\/p>\n<p>Sofyan, managing partner at Sofyan Djalil &amp; Partners law firm,<br>\nsaid the recent cross shareholders-driven restructuring by the<br>\nSalim and Lippo groups should encourage the government to<br>\nregulate such practices.<\/p>\n<p>He acknowledged that the recent restructuring conducted by the<br>\ntwo giants did create synergy and benefit both majority and<br>\nminority shareholders.<\/p>\n<p>\"But it is not free from public suspicion. Some people<br>\nconsider it as unethical. And in the absence of adequate legal<br>\nbasis, there is no mechanism for the public to prevent such<br>\npractices,\" Sofyan said.<\/p>\n<p>Last year, the Lippo Group restructured its financial-related<br>\nfirms, which included PT Lippo Securities, PT Lippo Life and PT<br>\nLippo Bank.<\/p>\n<p>The restructuring initially sparked controversy as it involved<br>\ncross ownership and mutual holding practices and was to be<br>\nfinanced by public funds through the issuing of rights.<\/p>\n<p>But the Lippo Group succeeded in its restructuring plan after<br>\nthe Riady family avoided cross shareholding.<\/p>\n<p>The Riady family sold its shares in Lippo Bank to Lippo<br>\nInsurance and then sold its shares in Lippo Insurance to Lippo<br>\nSecurities. Lippo Securities issued rights shares to finance the<br>\nacquisition.<\/p>\n<p>After restructuring, the Riady family still controls Lippo<br>\nBank and Lippo Insurance through Lippo Securities, in which it<br>\nowns 37.44 percent stake.<\/p>\n<p>And earlier this month, minority shareholders approved PT<br>\nIndocement Tunggal Prakarsa's plan to spin-off and sell all of<br>\nits 50.1 percent ownership in PT Indofood Sukses Makmur to focus<br>\non its cement business. Both firms are under the Salim Group.<\/p>\n<p>The Salim Group intends to proceed with the second stage in<br>\nits restructuring plan, selling Indofood's shares to the group's<br>\nfoodstuff listed-firm QAF Ltd of Singapore.<\/p>\n<p>This will give the Singaporean company a 50.1 percent stake in<br>\nIndofood. QAF intends to issue rights shares to fund the<br>\nacquisition.<\/p>\n<p>The chairman of the Capital Market Supervisory Agency, I Gede<br>\nPutu Ary Suta, said his agency could not prevent Salim's<br>\nrestructuring plan as it did not deviate from any existing<br>\nregulation.<\/p>\n<p>Sofyan said the absence of an antitrust law in Indonesia had<br>\nmade it possible for majority shareholders to take whatever<br>\ndecision on even a publicly listed corporation, Sofyan said.<\/p>\n<p>\"In the absence of an antitrust law, any kind of restructuring<br>\nis basically legal. This, of course, could create unfair<br>\ncompetition and punish consumers,\" Sofyan said.<\/p>\n<p>He acknowledged that Indonesia had already governed cross<br>\nshareholding, albeit in an obscure manner, through the 1995<br>\nCompany Law and several rulings issued by the Capital Market<br>\nSupervisory Agency.<\/p>\n<p>The law says the supreme authority in a corporation should lie<br>\nwith a shareholders meeting. This gives majority shareholders<br>\nenough room to exert their authority for their own benefit.<\/p>\n<p>But the law also gives minority shareholders the right to sue<br>\nthe company or demand the company buy back their shares at<br>\nreasonable prices if their interests are not accommodated.<\/p>\n<p>The Capital Market Supervisory Agency also requires publicly<br>\nlisted firms to ask for the approval of minority shareholders<br>\nwhenever restructuring carries a conflict of interests. (rid)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/government-urged-to-draft-law-on-cross-ownership-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}