{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1421692,
        "msgid": "focusing-on-pillars-of-investment-1447893297",
        "date": "1999-12-30 00:00:00",
        "title": "Focusing on pillars of investment",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Focusing on pillars of investment By Beni Sindhunata JAKARTA (JP): The three pillars of Indonesian investment and its economic scene, which are dissimilar but have the same objectives, are George Soros, foreign direct investment and aseng -- quasi-foreign businesses of Indonesian-owned investment companies usually registered at offshore centers. Therefore, it is difficult to decide which is better and safer for the Indonesian economy.",
        "content": "<p>Focusing on pillars of investment<\/p>\n<p>By Beni Sindhunata<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): The three pillars of Indonesian investment and<br>\nits economic scene, which are dissimilar but have the same<br>\nobjectives, are George Soros, foreign direct investment and aseng<br>\n-- quasi-foreign businesses of Indonesian-owned investment<br>\ncompanies usually registered at offshore centers. Therefore, it<br>\nis difficult to decide which is better and safer for the<br>\nIndonesian economy.<\/p>\n<p>Before further analysis a review is needed of the above three<br>\nsymbols or phenomenon of capitalism. George Soros is a Hungarian-<br>\nborn Jew, the symbol of the corporate raider and short-term<br>\ninvestor in the money and capital markets. In the context of the<br>\nmacroeconomy, Soros' money enters the very flexible, dynamic and<br>\nsensitive foreign portfolio investment (FPI). Easy come, easy go.<br>\nSuch moves have even becomes a trendsetter in reversing the<br>\nglobal money market, which now reaches US$1.2 trillion.<\/p>\n<p>The second, foreign direct investment (FDI) has a long-term<br>\nview and physical presence, although there is no guarantee it<br>\nwill produce environment friendly investment. In general, FDI<br>\nestablishes a joint venture with majority shares or 100 percent<br>\nforeign shares. Apart from the objective of absorbing the<br>\ndomestic market in the real sector, FDI is also made a basis for<br>\nexports of, by and to the global market.<\/p>\n<p>In brief, the presence of FDI can be symbolized by<br>\nmultinational giants of the Fortune 500 category or middle-class<br>\nenterprises. They bring in funds and set up a factory, export<br>\ntheir products, absorb the domestic market and most certainly<br>\ncontrol company management.<\/p>\n<p>The third phenomenon is what is termed here as aseng -- quasi-<br>\nforeign companies whose existence can be said to be of the \"now<br>\nyou see them, now you don't\" type. Such a company is an<br>\ninvestment business owned by an Indonesian and usually registered<br>\noverseas in an offshore center, after which it enters the country<br>\nwearing a foreign coat. Aseng companies are not entirely<br>\nassociated with firms of nonnative Indonesians as usually<br>\nsuggested because there are also \"native aseng\" firms.<\/p>\n<p>The presence of Soros is always sensational and creates<br>\nspeculation. Experts say where there is Soros there is business<br>\nchaos. Others say where there is Soros there will be business<br>\ncertainty, and the business world will compete for his Quantum<br>\nFund to get something of the investment fund.<\/p>\n<p>The entry of the Quantum Fund into Indonesia in mid-1998 when<br>\nthe crisis was at its height was therefore certainly of interest,<br>\nespecially after this global fund manager joined and acquired a<br>\nfifth of the shares in Bhakti Investama, a spearhead into<br>\nIndonesia. Soros has entered and is planning to enter various<br>\nsectors of banking and telecommunications, the cigarette industry<br>\nand even the underwear business.<\/p>\n<p>Long before Soros entered the country, many foreign fund<br>\nmanagers had invaded the Indonesian capital market and<br>\nestablished themselves in various sectors. One example is Norbax<br>\nInc., which invested no less than Rp 4.5 trillion in a dozen<br>\npublic companies with total assets of more than Rp 55 trillion in<br>\n1998.<\/p>\n<p>There was also a lot of investment through banks and financial<br>\ninstitutions as nominee companies. This type of investor will<br>\nincrease in number with various scales of investment, especially<br>\nwhen shares are still relatively cheap while the economy starts<br>\nshowing improvement.<\/p>\n<p>Last week Goldman Sachs, through Lotus Asset Management,<br>\nbought up shares of Multipolar. In 1998, Newbridge Capital<br>\nacquired PT Astra Microtronic for $90 million and is now<br>\nnegotiating to buy PT Astra International shares.<\/p>\n<p>The third type, the aseng, or the quasi-foreign investor firm,<br>\nlies between the above two types of global investment; they enter<br>\nas foreign portfolio investment but are actually owned by a<br>\nbusinessperson in Indonesia who owns a factory and well-running<br>\ninvestment even before the listing on the stock exchange.<br>\nGenerally this type of company enters through the acquisition of<br>\na public or nonpublic company which is a member of a business<br>\ngroup. Their existence becomes even more clear because the<br>\nforeign firms usually only enter Jakarta to dominate shares of<br>\ntwo or three companies of one group.<\/p>\n<p>So it is not surprising that many public companies give the<br>\nimpression of being much in demand in the eyes of investors, but<br>\nthe movement of shares of such firms is not very active and even<br>\nseems low in demand. This is because the majority of shares only<br>\nmove among related parties and do not spread among hundreds or<br>\nthousands of dominant investors.<\/p>\n<p>Quasi-foreign companies can also be categorized as foreign<br>\ndirect investment because some enter by the acquisition of<br>\nnonpublic firms. Therefore aseng investment can be recognized as<br>\nforeign portfolio investment and also foreign direct investment.<\/p>\n<p>Data collected by the Business Intelligence Report shows that<br>\nfrom 1994 to 1998, the total foreign portfolio investment in<br>\nIndonesia reached Rp 20.8 trillion, or about $5.5 billion at that<br>\ntime. In 1999 this figure is estimated to exceed dozens of<br>\ntrillion rupiah. This would include funds from quasi-foreign<br>\ninvestors and other \"Soros\" parties from various banks and global<br>\nfinancial institutions.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, in the same period the flow of foreign direct<br>\ninvestment entering Indonesia reached $16.9 billion, but there<br>\nwas also investment overseas by Indonesians amounting to $2.1<br>\nbillion. The net flow of foreign direct investment was therefore<br>\nonly $14.8 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Of course this figure cannot be placed on par with the flow of<br>\nforeign investment registered at the Investment Coordinating<br>\nBoard, because it only covers planning of both new and extended<br>\nprojects with different degrees of schedule and scale.<br>\nImplementation of plans could be complete, partial or even<br>\ncanceled. Imagine if all plans for foreign direct investment in<br>\nIndonesia from 1994 to 1998, which reached $144 billion, were<br>\nrealized the impact on the country's economy. But that will<br>\nremain speculation because realization of capital entering<br>\nIndonesia in that period only attained 11 percent of the plans,<br>\nor $16.9 billion.<\/p>\n<p>As an illustration, a tool of foreign direct investment which<br>\ncould be used for analysis and a benchmark of investment is the<br>\nInternational Finance Corporation. By June 1998 this multilateral<br>\ninvestment institute had invested $534 million in 41 companies.<br>\nThis was divided into two types -- loans amounting to $393<br>\nmillion for 29 companies and share participation totaling $141<br>\nmillion in 26 companies.<\/p>\n<p>This investment was spread over 11 business sectors with the<br>\nlargest concentration in textiles, which absorbed $107.9 million<br>\nthrough five companies.<\/p>\n<p>From the comparison of the three pillars of foreign investment<br>\nwe can make the following conclusions: All three of them are<br>\nimportant for the movement of both direct and indirect<br>\ninvestments through the financial sector. However, in the long<br>\nterm foreign direct investment is safer compared to foreign<br>\nportfolio investment given the latter's \"easy come, easy go\"<br>\ntrait.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed we are in greater need of giant multinational corporate<br>\nfirms flying foreign direct investment flags, but neither can we<br>\nsee the negative side of the presence of a George Soros or at<br>\nleast a Warren Buffet. For Jakarta has no lack of such figures<br>\nwho continue to wage guerrilla warfare in the money market and in<br>\nthe capital market. They continue to be on the lookout for<br>\ninteresting and prospective shares. Quasi-foreign company<br>\ninvestors, indeed, have a different vision and will not go far<br>\nfrom the country.<\/p>\n<p>Persistence in seeing the negative side of the entrance of<br>\ntemporary global investors, or foreign portfolio investment,<br>\nwould mean we are not ready or willing to enter the era of the<br>\nglobal monetary market, which will certainly take victims in the<br>\nthird millennium. Views against foreign portfolio investments can<br>\nbe considered mere public debate, and let each party play from<br>\nits own angle and interest.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is the director of the private Business<br>\nIntelligence Report in Jakarta.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/focusing-on-pillars-of-investment-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}