{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1493170,
        "msgid": "figuring-the-party-angle-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-08-06 00:00:00",
        "title": "Figuring the party angle",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Figuring the party angle James Kallman, Jakarta Indonesia's first direct presidential election has given political pundits a new conundrum to crack. However, I can't agree with those who say that political parties don't matter. For in the end it will be their influence that is likely to deliver the deciding votes.",
        "content": "<p>Figuring the party angle<\/p>\n<p>James Kallman, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia's first direct presidential election has given<br>\npolitical pundits a new conundrum to crack. However, I can't<br>\nagree with those who say that political parties don't matter. For<br>\nin the end it will be their influence that is likely to deliver<br>\nthe deciding votes.<\/p>\n<p>If one looks at the percentages gained in the first round of<br>\nvoting, some interesting figures appear in relation to the<br>\nattraction the major candidates had outside their party<br>\nallegiance.<\/p>\n<p>Third placed Wiranto was clearly the least attractive to<br>\nvoters outside of Golkar, gaining only 22.2 percent of the vote<br>\ncompared to Golkar's 21.58 percent in the general election.<\/p>\n<p>President Megawati Soekarnoputri fared a little better,<br>\nboosting PDI-P's 18.53 percent general election tally to 26.6<br>\npercent in the presidential contest.<\/p>\n<p>The big winner was obviously Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who<br>\nbuoyed by the 7.45 percent his new party gained in the general<br>\nelection, rode the crest of a wave of public popularity to gain<br>\n33.6 percent<\/p>\n<p>The reasons for this are quite simple. Politics in Indonesia<br>\nlacks maturity, which is of course understandable given the fact<br>\nthat even free general elections are still a novelty. Yet even in<br>\nmore mature democracies like the U.S., presidential elections<br>\noften become little more than popularity contests rather than<br>\nbased on reasoned debate about the serious issues facing the<br>\nnation.<\/p>\n<p>As came to the fore in the Indian elections earlier this year,<br>\nwhat matters to the vast majority of the electorate in developing<br>\ncountries is not foreign or economic policy, but the basic things<br>\nlike the availability of roads, clean water, electricity,<br>\neducation and healthcare.<\/p>\n<p>In this regard, many in the country are not yet entirely<br>\nconvinced that the government of President Megawati has produced<br>\nenough real changes in ideology from that of the previous<br>\ndecades. Thus Bambang Yudhoyono represents a fresh face, and<br>\nperhaps new ideas.<\/p>\n<p>Yet can this last as the two candidates chase their share of<br>\nthe near 40 percent as yet unclaimed vote that is up for grabs in<br>\nSeptember?<\/p>\n<p>With some 70 percent of supporters of unsuccessful candidates<br>\nreportedly undecided, expansions of the pie charts of the views<br>\nof those with a preference suggest that Bambang Yodhoyono should<br>\nwin with some ease.<\/p>\n<p>This would appear though to be a case of extrapolating the<br>\nparticular to the general, a practice fraught with danger, as my<br>\nold schoolmaster used to drum into us.<\/p>\n<p>The advantages that Susilo has enjoyed so far may not be so<br>\nevident come September. The lack of maturity in Indonesian<br>\npolitics could actually begin to work against him.<\/p>\n<p>The vast majority of the so-called undecided votes are likely<br>\nto go along the lines of party endorsement. Thus the best horse-<br>\ntrader will stand a very good chance of winning.<\/p>\n<p>Of particular importance will be the Wiranto (read Golkar)<br>\nshare of the vote, as whichever side reaches the best<br>\naccommodation is likely to be in pole position.<\/p>\n<p>Much has also been made of the sharp decline in numbers<br>\nvoting, the sign of a population already tired of a process that<br>\nhas so far brought little measurable benefit to their day-to-day<br>\nlives. One would have sincere doubts though that it would reach<br>\nthe level of apathy found in the UK or U.S., where often less<br>\nthan half of the electorate turns out to vote.<\/p>\n<p>Any decline in voter turnout however, only enhances the<br>\nimportance of the dedicated party vote, for it is the diehards<br>\nrather than the floating voter who will make the greatest effort<br>\nto vote.  Dedicated party vote usually means dedicated party<br>\nworkers too, people with the organization and experience in<br>\nensuring that all their supporters get to the polls.<\/p>\n<p>Thus adding all things together, and particularly if Megawati<br>\ncan find common ground with Wiranto and Golkar, it would appear<br>\nthat our incumbent president could be hard to beat in September.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is President Director of Moores Rowland, a Jakarta-<br>\nbased consultancy and corporate advisory service.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/figuring-the-party-angle-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}