{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1214147,
        "msgid": "environmental-disputes-new-options-1447893297",
        "date": "1995-04-25 00:00:00",
        "title": "Environmental disputes: New options",
        "author": null,
        "source": "",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Environmental disputes: New options JAKARTA (JP): Legal practitioners and environmental activists agreed yesterday on the need to supplement the court system with alternative means of resolving environmental disputes. Speaking at a seminar on the management of environmental conflicts in Indonesia, a number of experts said that the litigation system had not been effective in stemming violations of regulations designed to protect the environment.",
        "content": "<p>Environmental disputes: New options<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): Legal practitioners and environmental activists<br>\nagreed yesterday on the need to supplement the court system with<br>\nalternative means of resolving environmental disputes.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking at a seminar on the management of environmental<br>\nconflicts in Indonesia, a number of experts said that the<br>\nlitigation system had not been effective in stemming violations<br>\nof regulations designed to protect the environment.<\/p>\n<p>Police and state prosecutors acknowledge that lack of<br>\nexpertise in their agencies has made it difficult for them to<br>\nprosecute offenders against the 1982 Law of Environment. There is<br>\nbroad agreement that the few cases which do make it into court<br>\noften end with the offenders getting off lightly, to the further<br>\nchagrin of the government and conservation groups.<\/p>\n<p>Experts at yesterday's seminar suggested the introduction of<br>\nthe Alternative Dispute Resolutions (ADR) system as one way of<br>\nsettling environmental disputes.<\/p>\n<p>The system, according to Mas Achmad Santosa of the Indonesian<br>\nCenter for Environmental Law (ICEL), \"is capable of covering a<br>\nwide scope of issues and has a good chance of becoming an<br>\nefficient means of ending environmental disputes in the future.\"<\/p>\n<p>The seminar, attended by legal practitioners,<br>\nconservationists, government officials and representatives of the<br>\nIndonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, was jointly<br>\norganized by ICEL, Colorado-based Communication\/Decisions\/Results<br>\nAssociates, the office of the State Minister of Environment,<br>\nGerman-based GTZ and the Human Resources Development Project.<\/p>\n<p>Mas Achmad said that because an ADR was more flexible compared<br>\nwith formal litigation, it also had greater potential to resolve<br>\nconflicts with a \"win-win\" settlement.<\/p>\n<p>Sutadi Djajakusuma of the National Development Planning Board<br>\nsaid the government planned to set up an ADR Board this year.<\/p>\n<p>\"The public's increasing legal awareness has caused people to<br>\ndemand sound legal instruments capable of guaranteeing them legal<br>\nsecurity and assurance, based on truth and justice,\" Sutadi said.<\/p>\n<p>The public, he added, was also aware of the attitude of<br>\ngovernment officials which, he said, often reflected a lack of<br>\nlegal awareness and conscientiousness in upholding the law.<\/p>\n<p>\"A legal instrument is needed to respond to these rapid<br>\nchanges in society and we must admit that presently the public<br>\ndoes not have a very positive attitude towards the law.\"<\/p>\n<p>Sutadi acknowledged that formal litigation often produced<br>\nresults that were unsatisfactory, as well as costly, time-<br>\nconsuming and harmful to personal and social relationships. Court<br>\nactions also affected people's credibility, were complicated and<br>\ncaused unnecessary ongoing conflicts, he said.<\/p>\n<p>\"Litigations is useful to end disputes, but it is not the only<br>\nway for all conflicts,\" Sutadi said.<\/p>\n<p>Other experts said that ADR should be introduced as an<br>\nalternative instrument, rather than as a response to complaints<br>\nabout the inefficiency of the court system.<\/p>\n<p>Satjipto Rahardjo, a professor of law at Semarang's Diponegoro<br>\nUniversity, cautioned that because of its cooperative nature, ADR<br>\ncould easily lead to collusion, especially between the<br>\ngovernment, NGOs and industries, which are usually the defendants<br>\nin environmental disputes.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry Kadin Deputy Dewi<br>\nMotik Pramono, who oversees the chamber's environmental affairs,<br>\nemphasized the need for penalties to be imposed on companies that<br>\nviolated environmental laws.<\/p>\n<p>\"I don't think cooperative dispute settlements alone are<br>\nappropriate because businessmen often don't know, or want to<br>\nknow, that they are damaging the environment,\" she said.<\/p>\n<p>\"Through cooperation, they must be given plenty of information<br>\nbut they should still be penalized whenever they violate the<br>\nlaw.\" (pwn)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/environmental-disputes-new-options-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}