{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1481859,
        "msgid": "emergency-liquidity-loans-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-01-28 00:00:00",
        "title": "Emergency liquidity loans",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Emergency liquidity loans We greatly welcome the government's effort to draw a clear-cut agreement with Bank Indonesia on the definition of the central bank's role as lender of last resort to the banking industry.",
        "content": "<p>Emergency liquidity loans<\/p>\n<p>We greatly welcome the government's effort to draw a clear-cut <br>\nagreement with Bank Indonesia on the definition of the central <br>\nbank's role as lender of last resort to the banking industry.<\/p>\n<p>The government, Bank Indonesia and the House of <br>\nRepresentatives should indeed learn carefully from the 1997 to <br>\n1999 banking crisis, to prevent a protracted dispute over which <br>\nbanks are eligible for emergency liquidity support from the <br>\ncentral bank and which should be allowed to go under.<\/p>\n<p>Their wrangle over the sharing of the costs of the banking <br>\ncrisis, which was resolved only last August, indicates how <br>\nimperative and urgent is now the need for clear-cut rules and <br>\nprocedures for the extension of liquidity credit by Bank <br>\nIndonesia to commercial banks in financial distress.<\/p>\n<p>The recent amendment of the law on Bank Indonesia, which <br>\nstrengthened the function of the central bank as lender of last <br>\nresort to the banking industry, has removed the uncertainty <br>\nregarding contingency programs to bail out banks facing severe <br>\nliquidity crises.<\/p>\n<p>But this stronger mandate should be based on higher standards <br>\nof accountability; that requires clear-cut rules on the extension <br>\nof emergency liquidity support to prevent the recurrence of <br>\nprotracted disputes such as those that took place between 1998 <br>\nand 2003.<\/p>\n<p>The central bank's role as lender of last resort requires it <br>\nto provide promptly temporary support to illiquid banks to <br>\nprevent panic and massive runs that could lead sound institutions <br>\nto financial distress and consequently precipitate their <br>\ninsolvency.<\/p>\n<p>This was what Bank Indonesia did between late 1997 and early <br>\n1999 when the public lost trust in the banking industry. But the <br>\nabsence of clear-cut procedures and rules for such emergency <br>\nsupport and inadequate banking supervision made the bailout <br>\nprogram highly vulnerable to abuse.<\/p>\n<p>The basic rules of such emergency liquidity support stipulate <br>\nthat the central bank help only illiquid banks but not insolvent <br>\nones and that the loans be secured by adequate collateral.<\/p>\n<p>However, as the bitter experiences in 1997 to 1999 clearly <br>\nshow, the central bank found it extremely difficult to <br>\ndistinguish an illiquid bank from an insolvent one, especially <br>\nduring the height of the crisis. The panicky situation made it <br>\nwell-nigh impossible for the central bank to verify each of the <br>\nthousands of clearing transactions it conducted daily with <br>\ncommercial banks.<\/p>\n<p>The problems were made even worse because before May 1999 the <br>\ncentral bank was part of the government and was thus highly <br>\nvulnerable to cronyism and corruption. As the Supreme Audit <br>\nAgency discovered in 2000, many commercial banks misused the huge <br>\nsupport loans they received from the central bank.<\/p>\n<p>As Bank Indonesia has been politically independent since mid-<br>\n1999 it is no longer vulnerable to intervention from vested <br>\ninterests within the government or the House. But this autonomy <br>\nalone is not sufficient to prevent misuse of emergency liquidity <br>\nloans. There are at least two other conditions needed to <br>\nsafeguard the bailout program.<\/p>\n<p>First, as earlier suggested, the finance ministry, Bank <br>\nIndonesia and the House should formulate clear-cut rules and <br>\nprocedures for the extension of such emergency loans, covering <br>\nbasic requirements, step-by-step procedures for disbursement, <br>\nsecurity to back up such loans and tenure.<\/p>\n<p>The other requirement is that the central bank should further <br>\nstrengthen the capability of its bank supervision system to keep <br>\nit adequately informed on the up-to-date situation with regard to <br>\nall commercial banks. Effective supervision will enable the <br>\ncentral bank to distinguish illiquid from insolvent banks, <br>\nthereby preventing the misuse of its emergency liquidity support.<\/p>\n<p>__________<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/emergency-liquidity-loans-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}