{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1091004,
        "msgid": "electricity-companys-plight-1447893297",
        "date": "2001-02-17 00:00:00",
        "title": "Electricity company's plight",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Electricity company's plight However one analyzes its financial condition, state electricity company PLN is without a doubt broke. With current assets of only Rp 9.7 trillion (US$1.02 billion) as of September (latest data available) and Rp 77.3 trillion in debts, of which Rp 47.3 trillion were short-term liabilities, including Rp 21.5 trillion maturing last month, the state utility company is technically bankrupt.",
        "content": "<p>Electricity company's plight<\/p>\n<p>However one analyzes its financial condition, state<br>\nelectricity company PLN is without a doubt broke. With current<br>\nassets of only Rp 9.7 trillion (US$1.02 billion) as of September<br>\n(latest data available) and Rp 77.3 trillion in debts, of which<br>\nRp 47.3 trillion were short-term liabilities, including Rp 21.5<br>\ntrillion maturing last month, the state utility company is<br>\ntechnically bankrupt. Yet the government and the House of<br>\nRepresentatives remain embroiled in protracted debates about ways<br>\nof resolving the company's huge debts.<\/p>\n<p>More damaging was a recent threat by chief economics minister<br>\nRizal Ramli to let PLN go bust, pointing out that the huge debt<br>\nproblem was of the company's own making. Rizal said state<br>\ncompanies would never learn a lesson if the government intervened<br>\nto bail them out every time they defaulted on their debts.<\/p>\n<p>PLN, like most other state companies in the country, is<br>\ncertainly not a model of a well-managed enterprise. It is<br>\nnotorious for its gross inefficiency and for often exorbitantly<br>\nmarking up project costs. It also has its own share of corruption<br>\nand collusive practices, as discovered through a special audit by<br>\nArthur Andersen two years ago.<\/p>\n<p>It would be nonetheless unfair to place all the blame squarely<br>\non the PLN management, notably the current one which was<br>\nappointed less than a year ago. As the audit also found, PLN,<br>\nlike most other major state companies, had been used as a cash<br>\ncow by former president Soeharto's family members and cronies.<br>\nGovernment intervention inflated the costs of its procurement<br>\ncontracts. Still more devastating, the company had been forced to<br>\ndo business with dozens of private power generating companies<br>\nowned by politically well-connected investors under contracts<br>\nwhich were aimed at only benefiting the investors.<\/p>\n<p>It was these politically directed dealings which were<br>\nprimarily responsible for PLN's inefficiency. But the plunge of<br>\nthe rupiah against the U.S. dollar in late 1997 was the last<br>\nstraw. As the company's borrowings have mostly been in dollars<br>\nand 60 percent of its production costs are based on foreign<br>\ncurrencies, its debts have exploded to their current level. What<br>\nmakes the problem even more complex is that PLN cannot set its<br>\nrates on the basis of market forces because they are set by the<br>\ngovernment.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, prolonging the debate on who should be responsible<br>\nfor resolving the PLN debt would be playing a game of<br>\nbrinkmanship.<\/p>\n<p>Further delay in resolving the PLN debt through either<br>\nrescheduling or debt-equity conversion arrangements could<br>\neventually lead the country into a serious electricity crisis.<br>\nThe government should be well aware that the systemic risks of a<br>\nmassive power failure are equally devastating as those of bank<br>\nfailure. But while the government has spent more than $65 billion<br>\nin taxpayers' money to bail out the banking industry, the<br>\nelectricity sector has been left in a perilous situation.<\/p>\n<p>Even now the seeds of a major crisis are being sown as PLN is<br>\nno longer capable of doing standard maintenance work, let alone<br>\nmaking new investments to improve or expand transmission and<br>\ndistribution networks. As its creditworthiness has fallen way<br>\nbelow standard it no longer has access to new commercial credit<br>\nlines or the capital market.<\/p>\n<p>It is needless to reiterate how vital electricity is to the<br>\npeople, the economy. As the progress achieved over the past 30<br>\nyears has made the economy and the people, even those in most<br>\nrural areas, more dependent on power, one cannot imagine the<br>\nsocial chaos and disruption of economic activities that would be<br>\ncaused in the event of a major power blackout.<\/p>\n<p>Potential new investors are also watching how the government<br>\nsolves the PLN debt problem. They may continue to shun the<br>\ncountry even after the current political uncertainty ends if the<br>\nproblem of the electricity monopoly is not settled once and for<br>\nall. PLN has warned that if construction of new power plants is<br>\nnot started this year, the country may encounter a severe<br>\nelectricity shortage in 2003.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, while negotiations with independent power producers<br>\nshould be sped up to review their lopsided power sales contracts<br>\nwith PLN, it is most urgent for the government and the House to<br>\nmake a final decision on resolving PLN's huge debts.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/electricity-companys-plight-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}