{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1306523,
        "msgid": "djoko-freed-from-all-charges-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-08-29 00:00:00",
        "title": "Djoko freed from all charges",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Djoko freed from all charges JAKARTA (JP): South Jakarta District Court on Monday exonerated chief defendant Djoko S. Tjandra of all charges in the Rp 546 billion (US$64.2 million) Bank Bali scandal on a legal technicality and the prosecutor's failure to back his arguments up with testimony by witnesses.",
        "content": "<p>Djoko freed from all charges<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): South Jakarta District Court on Monday<br>\nexonerated chief defendant Djoko S. Tjandra of all charges in the<br>\nRp 546 billion (US$64.2 million) Bank Bali scandal on a legal<br>\ntechnicality and the prosecutor's failure to back his arguments<br>\nup with testimony by witnesses.<\/p>\n<p>\"Prosecutor Antasari Azhar has failed to present more than one<br>\nwitness to prove that the defendant had influenced officials to<br>\ndisburse Rp 904 billion in funds, as earlier charged by the<br>\nprosecutor,\" presiding judge Soedarto told the hearing at the<br>\ndistrict court.<\/p>\n<p>The defendant, a director of the trading and investment firm<br>\nPT Era Giat Prima (EGP), had taken over Bank Bali's interbank<br>\nloans from the closed Bank Daging Nasional Indonesia (BDNI) and<br>\nhad allegedly influenced certain officials, including suspended<br>\nCentral Bank (BI) governor Sjahril Sabirin, to disburse Rp 904<br>\nbillion in repayment of the funds.<\/p>\n<p>The action resulted in Rp 904 billion in losses to the state.<\/p>\n<p>Several witnesses at the earlier preliminary hearing had noted<br>\nthat PT EGP should never have taken over Bank Bali's interbank<br>\nloans since they were guaranteed by the government under the bank<br>\nrestructuring program.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier, Antasari had demanded an eighteen month-jail term for<br>\nDjoko, accusing the defendant of having violated subsection 1a of<br>\nArticle 1 of the 1971 Anti-Corruption Law, which carries a life<br>\nsentence.<\/p>\n<p>Antasari noted on Monday that he would appeal the verdict.<\/p>\n<p>In the absence of witnesses who could testify that the<br>\ndefendant had in any way influenced any official, judge Soedarto<br>\nsaid that it only remained for the panel of judges to decide on<br>\nthe matter of the January 1999 cessie (waiver of legal rights)<br>\ncontract.<\/p>\n<p>\"That's the legal technicality. A dispute involving a written<br>\nagreement is a civil case,\" Soedarto said.<\/p>\n<p>The scandal originated from the failure of three private banks<br>\n-- Bank BDNI, Bank Tiara and Bank Umum Nasional -- to repay a<br>\ntotal of Rp 904 billion to Bank Bali, a debt which remained<br>\nunpaid when the three were closed down by BI in late 1998 due to<br>\npoor financial records.<\/p>\n<p>Bank Bali then asked the government for the loans to be repaid<br>\nas it had since been placed in the restructuring program.<\/p>\n<p>The cessie contract stated that PT EGP was obliged to pay Rp<br>\n598 billion in negotiable instruments as collateral to Bank Bali<br>\nby June 11 last year, which amount was never paid.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, Bank Bali and PT EGP agreed that PT EGP would just<br>\npay the bank 60 percent of the value of the negotiable<br>\ninstruments -- that is Rp 358 billion in cash -- which PT EGP<br>\ngladly handed over.<\/p>\n<p>\"This is legal. According to Articles 1338 and 1340 of the<br>\nCivil Code, as long as both parties agree upon something, nobody<br>\nhas a right to stop them from doing so,\" Soedarto said after the<br>\nhearing. (ylt)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/djoko-freed-from-all-charges-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}