{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1290565,
        "msgid": "developing-smes-in-the-digital-era-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-02-22 00:00:00",
        "title": "Developing SMEs in the digital era",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Developing SMEs in the digital era By Daniel Kingsley This is the second of two articles on advancing small and medium enterprises. JAKARTA (JP): The next issue is comparative advantages and a level playing field. New e-trade companies are beginning to enter the rural market. Trade Management Indonesia is aware of several e-trade start-ups that have very sophisticated marketing plans; they have recently identified the rural market as having strong potential.",
        "content": "<p>Developing SMEs in the digital era<\/p>\n<p>By Daniel Kingsley<\/p>\n<p>This is the second of two articles on advancing small and<br>\nmedium enterprises.<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): The next issue is comparative advantages and a<br>\nlevel playing field. New e-trade companies are beginning to enter<br>\nthe rural market. Trade Management Indonesia is aware of several<br>\ne-trade start-ups that have very sophisticated marketing plans;<br>\nthey have recently identified the rural market as having strong<br>\npotential.<\/p>\n<p>These firms have chosen their target market based on careful<br>\nmarket research, which shows that: 1. Information is not freely<br>\navailable at the SME level; 2. There is a clear demand; 3. Public<br>\ninformation and facilities for its distribution exist in most<br>\nareas where SMEs operate, but are inadequate in terms of service<br>\nand technology.<\/p>\n<p>Commercial e-trade will only benefit those who can afford to<br>\nbuy the information, and many of the smaller enterprises cannot<br>\nafford this luxury.<\/p>\n<p>It is important that comparative disadvantages do not develop<br>\nand that those who cannot afford to access information through<br>\nthe free market have the system to access market information. It<br>\nis equally important that the system has the resources and<br>\nmanagement to function efficiently, maximize the quality of its<br>\ninformation and reach as many SMEs as possible.<\/p>\n<p>Since e-trade companies are starting up, and demand for<br>\ninformation exists, it is crucial to establish fluid lines of<br>\ninformation to those who cannot afford it through the market to<br>\ncreate a system of fair competition.<\/p>\n<p>If a level playing field is to be established within the SME<br>\nhierarchy, the most efficient correction measure is to balance<br>\ninformation constraints across socioeconomic borders by utilizing<br>\nexisting public services and allowing them to be useful for those<br>\nwho choose to use them.<\/p>\n<p>What about business alliances? Such alliances are extremely<br>\nsuccessful tactics for big business but are not common in the SME<br>\neconomy. Few use the concept and they are in a competitive<br>\ndisadvantage to those that do.<\/p>\n<p>Alliances will be one of the major advantages that develop<br>\nfrom an expanding information system, changing the way many firms<br>\noperate.<\/p>\n<p>Strategic business alliances are a mutual coordination of<br>\nplanning, managing, operating and purchasing between businesses<br>\nthat offer mutual benefits. They differ from traditional business<br>\npartnerships, which exist for a fixed time and\/or for specific<br>\nprojects and purposes.<\/p>\n<p>Joint ventures or contractual arrangements between partners<br>\nare limited in respect to future long-term expectations.<\/p>\n<p>Strategic alliances in business can be more fluid and lead to<br>\nlonger-term relationships and greater payoffs because they can<br>\nmaximize resource and distribution flows over time; they are more<br>\nstable relationships.<\/p>\n<p>With the introduction of e-business to SMEs, especially the<br>\nsmallest, there is an incredible amount of growth potential<br>\nthrough mutually beneficial alliances with the larger SMEs and<br>\nwith other ASEAN manufacturers, especially in Singapore.<\/p>\n<p>The information\/communication infrastructure does not<br>\nnecessarily need to be physically available to these smaller<br>\nfirms, as long as they are capable of receiving e-business<br>\ninformation.<\/p>\n<p>This can be accomplished in areas beyond the reach of<br>\nfacilities at the provincial and regional levels through hard<br>\ncopy distribution.<\/p>\n<p>A small industrious supplier of a simple component has the<br>\npotential to position himself as an export supplier. This type of<br>\nopportunity has never existed in Indonesia before. The potential<br>\nis there, but the infrastructure of information dissemination<br>\nmust be changed.<\/p>\n<p>The next point is dissemination strategy. Micro strategy which<br>\nfocuses on disseminating information on employment, export trade,<br>\ninterprovince trade, export exposure, investor exposure and<br>\npricing will have an immediate impact on SMEs.<\/p>\n<p>Information infrastructure is being built as we speak by many<br>\nof the e-trade firms. They can bring to their customers all of<br>\nthe above and more at a competitive market price. But we must be<br>\naware that the lowest levels in the SME hierarchy will not be<br>\nable to afford such services, either due to a lack of access to<br>\ncommunication lines or because of financial constraints.<\/p>\n<p>On the issue of structural reform, Indonesia's economy must<br>\nconcentrate on labor intensive industries. This is something that<br>\nany developing economy with some 210 million people to support<br>\nmust accept.<\/p>\n<p>The strategic business alliances will play an important role<br>\nin this development. The development of these alliances is a<br>\nmajor structural change for the SME economy and the most<br>\nimportant types of information to be disseminated and made<br>\navailable are management and logistical information, market<br>\ninformation and technical information.<\/p>\n<p>The two most important conditions are trust between potential<br>\npartners and reducing unnecessary costs of entering into these<br>\nalliances.<\/p>\n<p>There should be a minimum level of government intervention at<br>\nthe SME level, beyond providing services, which will be the best<br>\navenue the government could follow in encouraging the above<br>\nconditions.<\/p>\n<p>Government intervention can include overly aggressive tax<br>\nofficials, licensing bodies and legal officials (police\/justice<br>\ndepartment), as well as intimidation of potential foreign<br>\ninvestors by immigration officials.<\/p>\n<p>The government and the SMEs must work together to initiate<br>\npolicy that will create structural changes in the economy.<\/p>\n<p>The players in this economy, at any socioeconomic level, have<br>\na great opportunity to grow and attract investors, and to become<br>\nactive in the national and world economy. Indonesia cannot afford<br>\nto lose any competitive advantage it presently holds.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, it is critical for the government to prioritize<br>\nthe development of an electronic information access system that<br>\nwill allow SMEs to compete with each other and in the world<br>\neconomies, or risk isolation and limited growth potential as the<br>\nworld economies become united through information technology.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is managing director of PT Bumi Trade Management<br>\nIndonesia and a consultant on the development of small and medium<br>\nenterprises.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/developing-smes-in-the-digital-era-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}