{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1368996,
        "msgid": "developing-ri-gas-market-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-07-15 00:00:00",
        "title": "Developing RI gas market",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Developing RI gas market James Castle and Todd Callahan, CastleGroup, Jakarta Aggressive new players from Asia, Australia and the Middle East are successfully challenging Indonesia's decades-long domination of Asia's LNG market.",
        "content": "<p>Developing RI gas market<\/p>\n<p>James Castle and Todd Callahan, CastleGroup, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>Aggressive new players from Asia, Australia and the Middle<br>\nEast are successfully challenging Indonesia's decades-long<br>\ndomination of Asia's LNG market.  In a sign of the times, a<br>\nJapanese power utility recently announced that it would curtail<br>\npurchases from Indonesia by 2.3 million tons per year, another<br>\nutility from Taiwan recently chose Qatar over Indonesia for a<br>\nUS$8.6 billion LNG contract and the country has lost important<br>\nbids in China.<\/p>\n<p>Although such setbacks are extremely disappointing, they may<br>\nbe a blessing in disguise. Waning LNG exports may finally<br>\nencourage Indonesia to rethink its domestic energy strategy. The<br>\nwave of observers now calling on the government to pay greater<br>\nattention to developing the country's domestic gas market and<br>\nreduce its dependence on regional LNG buyers are right.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, energy analysts have been saying this for years. In a<br>\nnation with burgeoning energy needs, more of the nearly 3<br>\ntrillion cubic feet of gas produced each day in Indonesia should<br>\nbe utilized at home.  It is cheaper and cleaner than alternative<br>\nsources. More LNG and piped gas ought to be sold in Java and<br>\nother areas of the country that face mounting energy shortages.<\/p>\n<p>Still, despite extensive reserves, Indonesia's domestic gas<br>\nsector remains remarkably underdeveloped compared to its<br>\nneighbors. This is due to the fact that gas has traditionally<br>\nbeen developed for the lucrative export trade while the domestic<br>\nmarket, where investment in pipelines and other enabling<br>\ninfrastructure is minimal, has been largely ignored.<\/p>\n<p>And, although subsidies are coming down, Indonesia's energy<br>\neconomy continues to be over-reliant on expensive fuel oil<br>\nproducts. A switch to gas would produce enormous savings for the<br>\ncountry. In some cases, diesel is actually cheaper for PLN than<br>\ngas because the Ministry of Finance pays the difference and it<br>\ndoes not affect PLN's cash flow. This is a real blow both to<br>\nenergy efficiency and the countrys finances. It is a pernicious<br>\ndistortion that must be eliminated.<\/p>\n<p>In a concrete example of how much can be saved, consider power<br>\ngeneration. The country is hemorrhaging money by burning diesel<br>\nand mfo at its plants across Java. At current prices, diesel<br>\ncosts approximately US$4.50 per unit while gas costs $2.50 to<br>\n$3.00 per unit. Switching to gas would save the country up to<br>\n$300 million annually.<\/p>\n<p>Given the growing appetite for electricity, the shift would<br>\nyield even higher savings in subsequent years. For this reason,<br>\nPLN needs more public support to sign gas supply agreements from<br>\nUjung Pangkah, Oyong, ONWJ, Kepodang and Corridor (see box).<br>\nBeyond PLN, demand for gas from other customers like Perusahaan<br>\nGas Negara (PGN), the state fertilizer producers and other large<br>\nusers is also expanding. Hence it is imperative to bring more gas<br>\nfields on line to keep pace with demand.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the clear economic case for gas, several financial<br>\nobstacles are preventing policy changes that will drive greater<br>\ngas consumption. One perceived impediment is price. Although<br>\nIndonesia's most expensive gas is still much cheaper than diesel,<br>\nbuyers tend to view gas as a commodity in which the price should<br>\nbe the same in all cases.<\/p>\n<p>In the Indonesian context, where the sector is still<br>\nundeveloped, this view is incorrect because gas is not a freely<br>\ntraded commodity. Both buyer and seller need to make long term<br>\ncommitments to justify the investment needed to realize the<br>\nbenefits of gas utilization. Prices differ because every gas<br>\nfield is unique and has different development costs.<\/p>\n<p>In negotiations, the buyer's reference point should not be the<br>\ncheapest gas in Indonesia. It should be the cost of alternative<br>\nfuels and what constitutes an acceptable price for both buyer and<br>\nseller for the specific development in question.<\/p>\n<p>A second obstacle to completing more gas agreements is the<br>\nvarious guarantees that producers require. Production sharing<br>\ncontract operators need Standby Letters of Credit (SBLCs), take-<br>\nor-pay clauses and other contractual assurances before investing<br>\nin projects that typically deliver returns over 20 year periods.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of PLN, SBLCs are a particularly serious stumbling<br>\nblock because of bank lending limits. With PLN's demand for SBLCs<br>\nin the range of $800 million per year and credit availability to<br>\nPLN under current lending limits only $550 million, PLN cannot<br>\nsign appropriate guarantees.<\/p>\n<p>To overcome this problem, PLN has asked Bank Indonesia not to<br>\ninclude its SBLCs in the legal lending limit with government<br>\nlinked banks like BNI and Bank Mandiri. High-level consideration<br>\nshould be devoted to removing this obstacle so that PLN can<br>\nrationalize its energy needs.<\/p>\n<p>There is compelling logic for this request because even though<br>\nSBLCs do represent exposure, they are not identical to direct<br>\nloans. The SBLCs do not represent actual drawdowns. They are only<br>\npotential drawdowns that are unlikely to be used in full.<\/p>\n<p>The lack of a more robust domestic gas sector has handicapped<br>\nthe economy and cost the government hundreds of millions of<br>\ndollars per year.<\/p>\n<p>After more than five years of economic crisis, Indonesia can<br>\nno longer afford an energy mix that depends on expensive fuel oil<br>\nproducts, especially imported ones when there is an alternative<br>\nlocal fuel available in abundance. PLN and other large industrial<br>\nusers must gradually break this dependence with the help of Bank<br>\nIndonesia and the Ministry of Finance. If this can be<br>\naccomplished, significant government progress will have been made<br>\nin restoring the economy and placing the country on a sounder<br>\nfooting.<\/p>\n<p>James Castle is the founder of CastleAsia, a leading research<br>\nand business information company based in Jakarta. Todd Callahan<br>\nis a technical advisor at the same firm.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/developing-ri-gas-market-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}