{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1305362,
        "msgid": "demystifying-abdurrahman-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-08-02 00:00:00",
        "title": "Demystifying Abdurrahman",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Demystifying Abdurrahman By Michael Vatikiotis HONG KONG (JP): Of the many stories floating around Jakarta about Gus Dur, one of them is a telling indicator of his qualities as a politician. Back in 1990 Gus Dur was one of a number of Jakarta intellectuals who formed a new dissident grouping known as Forum Demokrasi. After several meetings it was decided to search for a leader for the group. As one of the founding members, Gus Dur's name was mentioned. But wait, said one member of the group.",
        "content": "<p>Demystifying Abdurrahman<\/p>\n<p>By Michael Vatikiotis<\/p>\n<p>HONG KONG (JP): Of the many stories floating around Jakarta<br>\nabout Gus Dur, one of them is a telling indicator of his<br>\nqualities as a politician.<\/p>\n<p>Back in 1990 Gus Dur was one of a number of Jakarta<br>\nintellectuals who formed a new dissident grouping known as Forum<br>\nDemokrasi. After several meetings it was decided to search for a<br>\nleader for the group. As one of the founding members, Gus Dur's<br>\nname was mentioned.<\/p>\n<p>But wait, said one member of the group. Shouldn't the leader<br>\nof an organization dedicated to the pursuit of democracy be<br>\ndemocratically elected?<\/p>\n<p>Gus Dur said nothing. Then, another member quickly opposed the<br>\nmove. His argument was that since the group was facing an<br>\nauthoritarian foe -- namely the military -- it should dispense<br>\nwith democratic niceties in order to avoid divisive squabbling<br>\nand focus on the struggle for democracy. Gus Dur again said<br>\nnothing, and was duly appointed leader of Forum Demokrasi without<br>\nan election.<\/p>\n<p>Most observers consider that Gus Dur stands for ideals --<br>\nspecifically democracy and religious tolerance. So when he was<br>\nelected president by the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) on<br>\nOct. 20, 1999, the country and its friends breathed a sigh of<br>\nrelief. Some of those who know him well held their breath in a<br>\nmoment of apprehension, however.<\/p>\n<p>It wasn't just that the man has suffered two strokes and is<br>\nclearly unable to do much with his failing eyesight. Neither was<br>\nit his mercurial and humorous personality. It was more than<br>\nanything his nature as a politician that was some cause for<br>\nworry.<\/p>\n<p>Good politicians do not make committed idealists. Political<br>\nsurvival requires flexibility and, above all, the skillful<br>\nmanipulation of ideas.<\/p>\n<p>Those who know him suspected that Gus Dur won the presidency<br>\nbecause of skillful manipulation and a degree of deceit. Perhaps<br>\na measure of luck was also involved. Other candidates either<br>\nlacked ability or appeal. But otherwise, given the odds, a lot of<br>\nit was clever politicking. Gus Dur simply outfoxed everybody else<br>\n-- much as he had predicted he would in the weeks before the<br>\nelection. Some time before the MPR Special Session, Gus Dur<br>\napproached a senior newspaper editor to ask him to release a<br>\nmember of staff -- so that she could work for him \"when I'm in<br>\nthe palace\".<\/p>\n<p>So if he is not an idealist, what kind of leader is Gus Dur,<br>\nand where is he taking the country and its vulnerable fledgling<br>\ndemocracy?<\/p>\n<p>Indonesian politics lacks institutional checks and balances<br>\nand is therefore a treacherous arena. Loyalty is fickle;<br>\npersonality is paramount, and patronage rules.<\/p>\n<p>Gus Dur has known the way things work ever since he sat at the<br>\nfeet of his eminent grandfather who served in Sukarno's Cabinet.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, he has spent his entire career in the political<br>\narena. He managed to steer the country's largest Muslim<br>\norganization, Nahdlatul Ulama, through a period of anti-Islamic<br>\nfeeling. He helped launch a dissident group in the 1990s that<br>\nmanaged to escape persecution. He championed the cause of<br>\ndemocracy while at the same time lending support to its most<br>\nardent enemy, president Soeharto.<\/p>\n<p>Gus Dur rose to prominence, not because of his idealism, but<br>\nbecause he knew how to make and break political deals. No<br>\nIndonesian politician has managed to threaten the government one<br>\nyear with a mob -- and support it's sham election campaign the<br>\nnext.<\/p>\n<p>There is another seldom-mentioned aspect of Gus Dur that<br>\ndisturbs some people.  As much as he speaks foreign languages and<br>\nlikes Beethoven, Gus Dur is also a thoroughly traditional figure.<br>\nHe plays well to the grass roots with his manipulation of<br>\ntraditional symbols of power -- jocularity, spiritualism and<br>\nunpredictability.<\/p>\n<p>Like his predecessor, Soeharto, Gus Dur makes sudden twists<br>\nand turns on the political stage and plays divide and rule. He<br>\nlikes it to be known in a subtle way that he consults the spirits<br>\nof ancient kings -- seeking inner strength from the whole panoply<br>\nof Javanese icons from Muslim saints to the sultan's of Mataram<br>\nand Majapahit -- and even the grave of founding father Sukarno.<\/p>\n<p>Above all he is the quintessential dalang (puppeteer)<br>\npolitician -- which is all about looking as if you control<br>\neverything around you rather than actually doing so.<\/p>\n<p>All this is to say that Gus Dur is not one-dimensional -- not<br>\nsimply an idealist. He is more accurately a political animal with<br>\nkeen instincts, which means we can't take his ideals for granted.<\/p>\n<p>For all his support for democracy there is precious little<br>\nevidence in the first eight months of his leadership that the<br>\ninstitutions of democracy so badly needed in Indonesia have been<br>\nreinforced.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, as political foes circled him, he lashed out and<br>\nthreatened the mass arrest of his opponents. For all his passion<br>\nfor tolerance, he was unable to stop the Laskar Jihad from<br>\nreaching North Maluku -- and he insists on saying that warring<br>\nlocal communities should sort out their own problems.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters and sympathizers like to pin the blame for Gus<br>\nDur's problems on his enemies. Losers from the old regime are<br>\nseen as taking advantage of Gus Dur and his family to destabilize<br>\nthe government.<\/p>\n<p>Although hard to prove, that is undoubtedly so, in some<br>\ninstances -- but not all. Corruption has crept back into the<br>\npalace because Gus Dur badly needs money to build his own support<br>\nbase and kick-start a political machine. His National Awakening<br>\nParty (PKB) party came third in the June 1999 elections and other<br>\nparties are coalescing in opposition to him.<\/p>\n<p>Gus Dur admitted recently to discussing the use of state funds<br>\nfor political ends. This is a problem that plagues all reformist<br>\ngovernments in their early stages: You need a slush fund to buy<br>\nthe tools needed to clear out the drains.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, realpolitik dictates that idealism becomes the<br>\nfirst victim of strong leadership. Gus Dur promised in the early<br>\nweeks of his presidency to help former Malaysian deputy prime<br>\nminister Anwar Ibrahim, who is languishing in jail. Just three<br>\nmonths later he had embraced Anwar's persecutor, Prime Minister<br>\nMahathir Mohamad, and struck a deal for cheap rice. So much for<br>\nideals.<\/p>\n<p>Successful consolidation should give Gus Dur the chance to<br>\nexecute some of his ideas and implement his ideals. But<br>\nconsolidation has proved difficult because of severe economic<br>\nproblems and a disgruntled elite that cannot bury differences and<br>\nwork for the good of the country.<\/p>\n<p>So he has turned instead to close family members and trusted<br>\nfriends. They, it seems, do their best to keep the bad news from<br>\nreaching him -- perhaps out of consideration for his frail<br>\nhealth. Trusted economic advisors and Cabinet colleagues are left<br>\nto guess how the President has arrived at his decisions --<br>\nbecause he certainly has not been listening to them. A real worry<br>\nfor the future is that Gus Dur may be unaware of what is wrong.<\/p>\n<p>That's what happened to Soeharto in his final years. The<br>\nculture of power in Indonesia insulates the leader from criticism<br>\nby clothing him in warm praise. Sycophancy plagues the<br>\npresidential office.<\/p>\n<p>A senior Cabinet minister from the old regime once<br>\ndemonstrated that he could get his secretary to agree that the<br>\nsun was shining even if it was dark and wet outside.<\/p>\n<p>Gus Dur has also been convinced of his rectitude by the<br>\nplaudits he received from overseas in the first months of his<br>\npresidency. Foreign support is now waning in the absence of<br>\nresults. Predictably Gus Dur has resorted to making nationalist<br>\nthreats.<\/p>\n<p>But let's make no mistake about Gus Dur; he isn't one to rely<br>\non anybody. He has a long track record of distaste for alignment.<br>\nOn his visit to Cuba, Fidel Castro actually came to visit Gus Dur<br>\nin his hotel.<\/p>\n<p>But perhaps the saddest prospect is that Gus Dur will start<br>\nlosing perspective because of his physical ailments. Two<br>\nsuccessive strokes have made him moody and intolerant. He gets<br>\nangry with close family members and often looks confused in<br>\npublic situations.<\/p>\n<p>On several occasions he has appeared insensitive -- like going<br>\nahead with a recent overseas trip instead of visiting victims of<br>\nthe Bengkulu earthquake. His tendency to crack jokes in public<br>\ngatherings is said to be a psychological byproduct of blindness<br>\n-- a need to hear other people present and be assured of their<br>\napproval.<\/p>\n<p>For all these reasons it is hard to take refuge in the idea<br>\nthat Gus Dur is an idealist. This in turn reduces him in stature<br>\nand strips him of any kind of defense on moral grounds. Policy is<br>\ndrifting and the very same popular forces that drove Soeharto out<br>\nof office are mustering again. Gus Dur remains the best of a bad<br>\nbunch for young radicals who experienced the power of the mob in<br>\n1998. His political opponents are clearly concerned that his<br>\npremature removal would not necessarily win public support.<\/p>\n<p>But if the economy does not improve and the whiff of scandal<br>\nis not dispelled from the palace, the students will be back. A<br>\npity, though. Indonesia does not need another change of political<br>\ncourse.<\/p>\n<p>It took a good two decades for the rot to accumulate and<br>\nforeign and local support to abandon Soeharto. Sadly there is<br>\nalready an air of decay hanging over Merdeka Palace and many<br>\nforeign governments are mulling over alternatives. But expect the<br>\nGus Dur presidency to cling to power. Rather like the short-lived<br>\nreigns of later Ottoman sultans when the empire was in decline,<br>\neveryone can see the need for change, but worries what their<br>\nfuture will be once the music stops.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is managing editor of the Far Eastern Economic<br>\nReview. This article was taken from Questioning Gus Dur, a book<br>\nnewly published by The Jakarta Post.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/demystifying-abdurrahman-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}