{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1549839,
        "msgid": "danamons-extra-charge-1447893297",
        "date": "1997-07-25 00:00:00",
        "title": "Danamon's extra charge",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Danamon's extra charge As a customer, my relationship with Bank Danamon only began about 50 days ago but the experience has been disgusting. On July 11, 1997, I transferred a small amount of Australian dollars from my AUD primadollar account to Australia. For that transfer, besides a fixed transfer fee of Rp 15,000, the Danamon JSX Branch charged an additional US$3.00 fee because the amount transferred was below the equivalent of $3,000.00. I was disturbed by this additional fee because: a.",
        "content": "<p>Danamon's extra charge<\/p>\n<p>As a customer, my relationship with Bank Danamon only began<br>\nabout 50 days ago but the experience has been disgusting.<\/p>\n<p>On July 11, 1997, I transferred a small amount of Australian<br>\ndollars from my AUD primadollar account to Australia. For that<br>\ntransfer, besides a fixed transfer fee of Rp 15,000, the Danamon<br>\nJSX Branch charged an additional US$3.00 fee because the amount<br>\ntransferred was below the equivalent of $3,000.00. I was<br>\ndisturbed by this additional fee because:<\/p>\n<p>a. Aware of misleading practice by many companies, before<br>\nopening the account I inquired about any charges and fees that<br>\nthe bank may charge a customer for various account-related<br>\nactivities, but such a fee was never mentioned.<\/p>\n<p>b. It is very difficult to understand the logic behind the<br>\ncharge because the fixed transfer fee was relatively high for<br>\nsmaller transfers while larger transfers will not benefit the<br>\nbank as they represents a reduction in bank funding.<\/p>\n<p>c. The teller in charge failed to show me the bank's written<br>\nprovision regarding the extra fee's validity. The teller simply<br>\nsaid that the branch didn't keep a copy of the provision because<br>\nit had been in effect for a long time (therefore, they had<br>\nmemorized it and customers should not question anything about<br>\nit).<\/p>\n<p>Again, on July 22, 1997, I transferred A$3,000 from a<br>\nprimadollar to primadana account. The exchange rate for such<br>\npurpose displayed on the board was $A1 = Rp 1,935.60, but the<br>\nrate applied to my transaction was $A1 = Rp 1,908.53. Danamon's<br>\nstaff explained that due to rate volatility at the time, the head<br>\noffice had corrected the rates and the rates displayed were<br>\nmisleading. Because of the bank's misconduct in displaying the<br>\nwrong rates, I asked the bank to cancel the transaction without<br>\ncharging me additional costs. And do you know what the staff<br>\nsaid? The only way to cancel the transaction was to buy back the<br>\n$A at the rate of $A1 = Rp 1,974 point something. Which means the<br>\nbank made around Rp 200,000 in a matter of seconds by cheating<br>\nand being misleading. This suggestion will even make an idiot<br>\nlaugh and an angel angry.<\/p>\n<p>In some countries such a practice could cost a bank a fortune<br>\nin the form of heavy legal fines and lost customers. And as a<br>\nwell-known company in the 15th most competitive country, I think<br>\nit is time for Danamon to stop preying on weak customers.<\/p>\n<p>ALFONSUS S<\/p>\n<p>Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/danamons-extra-charge-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}