{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1292439,
        "msgid": "cultural-differences-a-sacred-cow-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-03-10 00:00:00",
        "title": "Cultural differences a sacred cow?",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Cultural differences a sacred cow? By Donna K. Woodward MEDAN (JP): Last Dec. 30 The Jakarta Post carried a report from Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Finance and Industry Kwik Kian Gie about the state-run electricity firm's loss of Rp 5 trillion because of poor management. In an ironic juxtaposition, in the same issue there was an article by consultant James O'Hara discussing Indonesian companies' fear of introducing management change.",
        "content": "<p>Cultural differences a sacred cow?<\/p>\n<p>By Donna K. Woodward<\/p>\n<p>MEDAN (JP): Last Dec. 30 The Jakarta Post carried a report<br>\nfrom Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Finance and Industry<br>\nKwik Kian Gie about the state-run electricity firm's loss of Rp 5<br>\ntrillion because of poor management. In an ironic juxtaposition,<br>\nin the same issue there was an article by consultant James O'Hara<br>\ndiscussing Indonesian companies' fear of introducing management<br>\nchange.<\/p>\n<p>If foreign consultants working in Indonesia share any<br>\nexperience, it is probably that of having one's recommendations<br>\nignored if not expressly rejected by clients. As noted by O'Hara,<br>\nrecommended changes are sometimes avoided because business<br>\nexecutives believe that change is an admission of inadequacy and<br>\ntantamount to a loss of face.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes changes are postponed out of complacency; there is<br>\nno perceived need for change so long as business results are<br>\nconsidered satisfactory.<\/p>\n<p>There is a third reason sometimes proffered for rejecting the<br>\nchanges recommended by foreign consultants. Some business<br>\nexecutives contend that what works in other countries simply will<br>\nnot work in Indonesia because of incompatible cultural values.<\/p>\n<p>Experts try to articulate what these cultural values and<br>\ndifferences are. (The term \"culture\" itself presents a problem of<br>\ndefinition, especially in Indonesia, where culture is actually a<br>\npotpourri of cultures.)<\/p>\n<p>Cultural variety is seductive and exhilarating. But as we also<br>\nsee, culture-based variations in belief and behavior can become<br>\nbarriers to understanding and cooperation. The management changes<br>\nwhich most often meet resistance from managers are those relating<br>\nto human resource management: to performance standards and<br>\nworkplace values.<\/p>\n<p>Because of their culture, Indonesians cannot be expected to<br>\nreport to work on time, to complete assignments according to<br>\ninstructions, to be self-reliant and use initiative to solve<br>\nproblems, to work industriously, to be truthful about what<br>\nsomething costs, to be trustworthy about financial<br>\nresponsibility, to meet obligations to an employer if there is a<br>\ncompeting family obligation.<\/p>\n<p>These stereotypical opinions are commonly offered as a<br>\nrationale for not entrusting employees with more responsibility<br>\nand not improving their salaries, and for permitting unacceptable<br>\nwork habits. And it is not necessarily foreign managers who say<br>\nthese things; Indonesian managers make the same comments.<\/p>\n<p>They turn the notion of cultural differences into a sacred<br>\ncow, using it to rationalize conduct that would not otherwise be<br>\nacceptable. Some Indonesian employees do embody such<br>\nshortcomings, as do their counterparts in New York or Frankfurt<br>\nor Melbourne.<\/p>\n<p>Other Indonesian workers defy these stereotypes. No, the<br>\nproblem is not one of immutable cultural differences. Nor is the<br>\nproblem the poor quality of human resources in Indonesia. The<br>\nbiggest handicap of Indonesian workers is the antiquated human<br>\nresource management styles favored by both Indonesian and<br>\nexpatriate-managed companies.<\/p>\n<p>In a cheap labor environment, companies find it easier to live<br>\nwith the status quo of poor performance and low productivity than<br>\nto introduce change.<\/p>\n<p>Managers decline to introduce modern management principles and<br>\nemployee incentives, and then in a fallacy of circular reasoning<br>\ncite continuing poor worker productivity to justify a refusal to<br>\nimplement modern human resource management methods.<\/p>\n<p>Employers tolerate employees' misuse of work hours, excessive<br>\nabsenteeism, petty corruption and misappropriation of company<br>\nproperty and other costly, profit-reducing practices; yet wages<br>\nare kept discouragingly low.<\/p>\n<p>Counterproductive labor laws protect workers excessively from<br>\ntermination for poor performance, but sanction substandard wage<br>\nrates. Qualified employees are denied employment because of their<br>\nreligion or ethnicity, while the less qualified are often given<br>\npreferred positions because they have the right backgrounds or<br>\nconnections.<\/p>\n<p>Progressive human resource management is an idea whose time<br>\nhas not yet come to Indonesia. Instead of millennium-era employee<br>\nrelations we see a combination of benevolent despotism and<br>\noutright repressiveness in the workplace, whether the workplace<br>\nis a factory, a fish farm, a hospital or a bank. (Government<br>\noffices are a little different, since to prevent mutiny the civil<br>\nservants and troops are given leeway for the lucrative practice<br>\nof corruption, collusion and nepotism, or KKN.)<\/p>\n<p>Are cultural differences really so deep and insurmountable<br>\nthat modern management principles like accountability and mutual<br>\nrespect cannot be translated successfully into policies and<br>\npractices in Indonesia?<\/p>\n<p>Employers who have genuinely given modern management<br>\nprinciples a try would say no. Outmoded human resource<br>\nmanagement, not culture, is the real enemy of Indonesian workers.<br>\nCultural differences are real, but if we should not disregard<br>\ntheir significance neither should we sanctify them.<\/p>\n<p>Let managers hold employees accountable for their performance.<br>\nLet companies commit themselves to modern human resource<br>\nmanagement methods and KKN-free standards of employee conduct.<\/p>\n<p>Let the government revise labor laws to mandate adequate wages<br>\nand working conditions, but also permit appropriate discipline<br>\nfor non-performing employees. Let companies not fear change for<br>\nthe wrong reasons. Do not let cultural differences become an<br>\nexcuse for avoiding management reform. Do not demean Indonesian<br>\nculture and handicap Indonesian workers from a misbegotten<br>\ntolerance.<\/p>\n<p>The writer, an attorney and former American diplomat at the<br>\nU.S. Consulate General in Medan, is president director of PT Far<br>\nHorizons, a management consultancy firm.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/cultural-differences-a-sacred-cow-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}