{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1347760,
        "msgid": "courts-sentence-for-akbar-too-lenient-analysts-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-01-20 00:00:00",
        "title": "Court's sentence for Akbar too lenient: Analysts",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Court's sentence for Akbar too lenient: Analysts Kurniawan Hari and Moch. N. Kurniawan, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta Several legal analysts criticized the three-year jail sentence handed to House Speaker Akbar Tandjung as being too lenient, saying that the Supreme Court should hand him a heavier sentence \"to satisfy the public's sense of justice\".",
        "content": "<p>Court&apos;s sentence for Akbar too lenient: Analysts<\/p>\n<p>Kurniawan Hari and Moch. N. Kurniawan, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>Several legal analysts criticized the three-year jail sentence<br>\nhanded to House Speaker Akbar Tandjung as being too lenient,<br>\nsaying that the Supreme Court should hand him a heavier sentence<br>\n&quot;to satisfy the public&apos;s sense of justice&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>Many other legal experts also called on the judiciary, mainly<br>\nthe high court and the Supreme Court, to be more transparent when<br>\nhandling cases, especially those that involve public figures and<br>\nstate officials.<\/p>\n<p>Benny K. Harman of the Indonesian Legal Aid Institute (YLBHI)<br>\nand Achmad Ali of the Hasanuddin University said the high court<br>\nshould prosecute Akbar and the other two defendants, Winfried<br>\nSimatupang and Dadang Sukandar, to the full extent of the law<br>\nsince the misappropriation of Rp 40 billion (4.5 million) in<br>\nBulog funds is an exceptional crime.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Corruptors whose wrongdoings have brought suffering to the<br>\npeople should be given harsh punishment in an attempt to fight<br>\nthe rampant corruption. If they are public servants they deserve<br>\nthe maximum penalty,&quot; Benny told The Jakarta Post by telephone.<\/p>\n<p>He said the three-year jail sentence handed down to Akbar was<br>\ntoo lenient and imbalanced because of his role in the case.<br>\n&quot;Judges should impose sentences of at least 15 years imprisonment<br>\nand the verdicts should be started immediately in order to<br>\nadminister shock therapy to other corruptors,&quot; he said.<\/p>\n<p>The high court turned down Akbar&apos;s appeal and upheld the<br>\nCentral Jakarta District Court&apos;s Sept. 2002 decision, reasoning<br>\nthat Akbar, in his capacity as then state secretary\/Cabinet<br>\nminister, &quot;did not supervise how the funds were used and whether<br>\nthe funds reached their target&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>Separately, Achmad said the judges who tried the case did not<br>\nconsider people&apos;s reaction to the case.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;We hope the Supreme Court will handle the case immediately to<br>\nstop Akbar&apos;s efforts of buying time and to listen to the people&apos;s<br>\naspirations when handling Akbar&apos;s appeal,&quot; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Observers said there is little chance that Akbar will win his<br>\nappeal at the Supreme Court since the district court and the high<br>\ncourt have ruled that he is guilty. A Supreme Court decision<br>\ngiving him a more lenient sentence would raise the public&apos;s<br>\ndistrust in the judiciary.<\/p>\n<p>Calls are increasing for Akbar to step down from his positions<br>\nat the House of Representatives and the Golkar Party following<br>\nthe high court&apos;s decision last Friday. So far, at least 75<br>\nlegislators from numerous factions, including Golkar, have signed<br>\na no-confidence motion against Akbar&apos;s leadership in the<br>\nlegislative body.<\/p>\n<p>The panel of judges has not ordered Akbar&apos;s arrest or those of<br>\nthe other defendants for unclear reasons.<\/p>\n<p>The criminal code gives judges the discretionary right not to<br>\nexecute the verdict for convicted state officials who are<br>\nsentenced to five years imprisonment or less. However, both<br>\nWinfried and Dadang are not state officials and they have not<br>\nbeen put in jail.<\/p>\n<p>Benny and Achmad also criticized the judges who tried Akbar&apos;s<br>\ncase for having misused their discretionary authority as they<br>\nalleged they were prejudiced in their ruling.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Rudi Satrio, an expert on law at the University of<br>\nIndonesia and Abdul Gani, the director general of law and<br>\nlegislation at the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, said the<br>\nhigh court and the Supreme Court should be transparent on how<br>\nthey were trying the case.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;It is not enough that the judges open the trial to the public<br>\nbut the public should be given access to information on the<br>\ntrial&apos;s schedule and the judges&apos; reasoning for their decisions.<br>\nTransparency is needed to prevent the judiciary from being<br>\ncorrupt,&quot; said Rudi.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/courts-sentence-for-akbar-too-lenient-analysts-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}