{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1033730,
        "msgid": "costly-chemicals-1447893297",
        "date": "1996-06-11 00:00:00",
        "title": "Costly chemicals",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Costly chemicals The June 4 deregulation package exempted ethylene, polyethylene, propylene and polypropylene, the building blocks of plastics and synthetic fibers, from the scheduled tariff reductions.",
        "content": "<p>Costly chemicals<\/p>\n<p>The June 4 deregulation package exempted ethylene,<br>\npolyethylene, propylene and polypropylene, the building blocks of<br>\nplastics and synthetic fibers, from the scheduled tariff<br>\nreductions. It might be a simple coincidence that these<br>\nchemicals, of which almost US$800 million was imported last year,<br>\nare all produced by companies controlled by politically-well<br>\nconnected businessmen -- Prajogo Pangestu, Sudono Salim, Sigit<br>\nHardjojudanto, Bambang Trihatmodjo, Sudwikatmono, Henry Pribadi<br>\nand Ibrahim Risjad.<\/p>\n<p>Immunity from the tariff reduction schedule allows the import<br>\nduty on ethylene and propylene to remain at 25 percent and the<br>\nduty on polyethylene and polypropylene to stay at 40 percent<br>\nuntil both are cut to a maximum 10 percent in 2003. The ASEAN<br>\nFree Trade Area then comes into full operation with a tariff<br>\nrange of 0 to 5 percent on almost all manufactured goods.<\/p>\n<p>Last February, when the finance minister and the industry and<br>\ntrade minister slapped a 25 percent tariff on ethylene and<br>\npropylene, which are produced by PT Chandra Asri, the protection<br>\nwas supposed to be removed at the end of this month, but the<br>\nministers have since had to eat their words. Even the seemingly<br>\ntemporary tariff caused controversy by contradicting Indonesia's<br>\neconomic reform process.<\/p>\n<p>With polyethylene and polypropylene both protected by a 40<br>\npercent tariff, the government considered the ethylene and<br>\npropylene tariff increase a win-win policy. The polyethylene<br>\nindustry is, after all, dominated by Chandra Asri's annual<br>\ncapacity of 300,000 tons and PT Petrokimia Nusantara Interindo<br>\n(Peni) with 450,000 tons. The polypropylene industry is<br>\ncontrolled by PT Tri Polyta with an annual capacity of 340,000<br>\ntons. The Indonesian shareholders of Chandra Asri and Tri Polyta<br>\nare almost identical, comprising Prajogo, Bambang, Henry Pribadi,<br>\nSalim and Sudwikatmono. PT Peni is owned jointly by Sigit and BP<br>\nChemicals.<\/p>\n<p>Given the large imports of upstream and midstream chemicals,<br>\ntemporary protection of the petrochemical industry is warranted<br>\nto curb import growth amid the worrisome increase in the current<br>\naccount deficit. The deficit is estimated to reach $8 billion<br>\nthis year, almost 4 percent of the gross domestic product.<\/p>\n<p>However, permanent protection until 2003, as effected by the<br>\nlatest reform package, retards efficiency and, consequently, the<br>\ncompetitiveness of domestic industry. Given the wide use of<br>\nplastics and synthetic fibers by manufacturers, the tight tariff<br>\nprotection will increase costs for numerous downstream<br>\nindustries.<\/p>\n<p>The protection is raising eyebrows as well because most<br>\nupstream and midstream chemical plants are controlled by a few<br>\npolitically-well connected businessmen. For example, the<br>\ncountry's aromatics center, which will start manufacturing<br>\nparaxylene, benzene and olefin feedstocks in Aceh in 1998, is<br>\ncontrolled by Hutomo Mandala Putra through his Humpuss Group. The<br>\nmanufacture of ethylene dichloride and ethylene glycol is<br>\ncontrolled by Sudwikatmono, Salim, Risjad and Bambang. Plastic<br>\nfilm is dominated by Henry and Risjad.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/costly-chemicals-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}