{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1145651,
        "msgid": "corruption-who-cares-1447893297",
        "date": "2005-02-19 00:00:00",
        "title": "Corruption, who cares?",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Corruption, who cares? \"I don't care,\" has apparently become a catchphrase among government officials, following President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's example. Responding to a survey showing his declining popularity, the President said earlier this month: \"I don't care about my popularity.\" The President's words have given others in his circle an idea or two.",
        "content": "<p>Corruption, who cares?<\/p>\n<p>\"I don't care,\" has apparently become a catchphrase among<br>\ngovernment officials, following President Susilo Bambang<br>\nYudhoyono's example. Responding to a survey showing his declining<br>\npopularity, the President said earlier this month: \"I don't care<br>\nabout my popularity.\"<\/p>\n<p>The President's words have given others in his circle an idea<br>\nor two. Minister of Finance Yusuf Anwar, when asked about a<br>\nsurvey by Transparency International Indonesia (TII) showing the<br>\ncustoms office as the most corrupt institution in the country,<br>\nsaid on Thursday, \"Just let it go. I don't care.\"<\/p>\n<p>A similar response also came from Jakarta Governor Sutiyoso<br>\nover the labeling of Jakarta as the most corrupt city in the<br>\ncountry by the TII. Although he did not use the words \"I don't<br>\ncare\", Sutiyoso retorted that the wrong businesspeople were<br>\nprobably selected as respondents -- those who did not win tenders<br>\nfor city projects.<\/p>\n<p>The indifference of Yusuf and Sutiyoso is particularly<br>\nworrying as it is in response to corruption within institutions<br>\nunder their command.<\/p>\n<p>The TII's survey, which places the customs office as the most<br>\ncorrupt institution in the country, is actually not surprising.<br>\nIt just confirms public perception, and even a previous survey by<br>\nthe World Bank that ranks customs and also the tax office as two<br>\nof the most corrupt institutions. The TII survey puts the tax<br>\noffice in 11th place on its list of most corrupt institutions.<\/p>\n<p>Rather than belittling the survey, the minister should have<br>\nused it as a tool to further pressure the customs office to<br>\nimprove on its performance, or to set about removing corrupt<br>\nofficials from the customs office.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, Sutiyoso's serious consideration of the results<br>\nwould have been more reassuring than his defensiveness. Actually,<br>\nhis argument -- that it makes sense that most corruption cases<br>\noccur in Jakarta as 70 percent of financial transactions in the<br>\ncountry take place in the capital -- could be spot on. However,<br>\nstating the obvious as a defense just sounds like making excuses.<\/p>\n<p>At the very least, Sutiyoso and Yusuf should have welcomed the<br>\nresults as a commendable effort from the TII in the fight against<br>\ncorruption.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the TII's 2004 Indonesian Corruption Perception Index<br>\nsurvey is a good reminder to all of us of our duty to refuse to<br>\ntolerate corruption in our government, as well as in our society.<\/p>\n<p>Any civil effort, no matter how small, strengthens the<br>\ncampaign against corruption, particularly at a time when the<br>\nlegal institutions at the helm of the corruption fight are<br>\nstruggling in their mission.<\/p>\n<p>One of the most important of these institutions is the<br>\nCorruption Eradication Commission (KPK), an independent<br>\ninstitution established in 2002, following a prolonged tug-of-war<br>\nbetween the government and members of the House of<br>\nRepresentatives. While it struggles to bring to justice big-time<br>\nembezzlers, the latest Constitutional Court verdict was a major<br>\nblow for the commission.<\/p>\n<p>Although the verdict recognizes the commission's existence, it<br>\nsays the commission can not try cases that predate its<br>\nestablishment.<\/p>\n<p>Another key institution in the fight against corruption is the<br>\nAttorney General's Office. Interestingly, in a hearing between<br>\nHouse Commission II and III and the Attorney General's Office on<br>\nThursday, one legislator referred to the office as a \"village of<br>\nthieves\", prompting a heated debate. Although this statement was<br>\nprobably politically motivated, it also stirs in us the uneasy<br>\nfeeling that we can not hope for too much from prosecutors in<br>\nsending major corruption suspects to prison.<\/p>\n<p>Is our battle against corruption really so futile? That all<br>\ndepends on which way you are looking at it. Reassurances can be<br>\nfound, that the country is inching toward its goal of creating<br>\nclean governance, in the progress made by various civic groups<br>\noutside the government, such as the TII, the Indonesian<br>\nCorruption Watch and other anticorruption groups and activists.<br>\nThe next question is, how fast are we are proceeding. Maybe not<br>\nfast enough, but at least, when public officials are not<br>\nconcerned about combating corruption, somebody else in society is<br>\nwilling to fight in their place.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/corruption-who-cares-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}