{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1437783,
        "msgid": "constitution-needs-change-experts-1447893297",
        "date": "1999-05-01 00:00:00",
        "title": "Constitution needs change: Experts",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Constitution needs change: Experts JAKARTA (JP): The nation needs to amend the 1945 Constitution to enable the establishment of effective power checks and balances and the protection of citizens' rights, analysts concluded on Thursday. In a discussion held by the Center for Information and Development Studies titled \"1945 Constitution Amendments Toward a New Democratic Indonesia\", legal experts argued the nation would be prey to dictatorial leadership if the constitution remained unchanged.",
        "content": "<p>Constitution needs change: Experts<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): The nation needs to amend the 1945 Constitution<br>\nto enable the establishment of effective power checks and<br>\nbalances and the protection of citizens&apos; rights, analysts<br>\nconcluded on Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>In a discussion held by the Center for Information and<br>\nDevelopment Studies titled &quot;1945 Constitution Amendments Toward a<br>\nNew Democratic Indonesia&quot;, legal experts argued the nation would<br>\nbe prey to dictatorial leadership if the constitution remained<br>\nunchanged.<\/p>\n<p>They agreed the executive-heavy constitution had led to power<br>\nabuses by the president during the past 30 years, with neither<br>\nthe House of Representatives (DPR) or the Supreme Court able to<br>\ncurb presidential dominance.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking were law professors Laica Marzuki of Hasanuddin<br>\nUniversity in South Sulawesi, Ujungpandang, Mohammad Mahfud of<br>\nIndonesian Islamic University and Muchsan from Gadjah Mada<br>\nUniversity, both located in Yogyakarta.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;It&apos;s a disaster for this nation to allow the constitution to<br>\ngive the president too much power, as both the head of state and<br>\nthe government... because power tends to corrupt,&quot; Laica told<br>\nthe discussion, moderated by political scientist Indria Samego.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The president is so powerful he could just leave a bill<br>\ndeliberated and passed by the House unsigned,&quot; Mahfud said,<br>\nreferring to the broadcast bill which former president Soeharto<br>\nrefused to pass into law in 1997.<\/p>\n<p>Muchsan said: &quot;There must be a distribution and balance of<br>\npower... a kind of checks and balances system&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>The three also agreed that House empowerment required<br>\namendments to the constitution.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;No longer needed is the People&apos;s Consultative Assembly (MPR),<br>\nbecause it&apos;s confusing. Just the DPR, as the people&apos;s sovereignty<br>\n(as power holder) will do,&quot; Muchsan said.<\/p>\n<p>After the election, the MPR will consist of 700 members, 462<br>\nwhom will be elected. The nonelected MPR legislators comprise 38<br>\nIndonesian Military (TNI) members, 65 representatives of interest<br>\ngroups as well as 135 provincial representatives.<\/p>\n<p>Mahfud suggested the constitution stipulate that all<br>\nlegislators be elected.<\/p>\n<p>Participants also targeted articles regulating the Supreme<br>\nCourt, which they said should be equipped with judicial review<br>\npowers.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Without this (power), the constitution will enable judicial<br>\ncrimes to continue,&quot; Laica said, referring to laws which opened<br>\nthe way to corrupt and collusive practices.<\/p>\n<p>Currently, a MPR decree effectively bars the Supreme Court<br>\nfrom reviewing laws, which are mostly sponsored by the<br>\ngovernment.<\/p>\n<p>Mahfud suggested the amendment ensure a rigid separation of<br>\njudicial powers from the executive power.<\/p>\n<p>Criticism over the country&apos;s judicial system, known for its<br>\nimpartial stance, stemmed from the fact that judges are<br>\nconsidered members of the bureaucracy, due to their status as<br>\ncivil servants. According to the law, the courts are<br>\nadministratively and financially under the Ministry of Justice.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Advisory Board (DPA) also came under scrutiny.<br>\nParticipants said the article ordaining the establishment of the<br>\nDPA should be dropped, because the board was a &quot;useless&quot; state<br>\ninstitution and a burden for the state budget.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The President could just hire experts to advise him, instead<br>\nof consulting the DPA,&quot; Laica suggested.<\/p>\n<p>On the powerful executive institution, the experts agreed the<br>\nconstitution should scrap the words: &quot;to be regulated later by<br>\nlaws&quot;, because the expression was a loophole for presidential<br>\ncontrol.<\/p>\n<p>Also raised in the forum was the need for a direct<br>\npresidential election and restriction of the presidential term.<\/p>\n<p>Noted lawyer Adnan Buyung Nasution concluded the session,<br>\nwarning that civil society may have to confront the military in<br>\nany effort to amend the constitution.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The military regard the constitution as its dogma and<br>\nideology,&quot; he said. (aan)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/constitution-needs-change-experts-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}