{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1317105,
        "msgid": "confusing-new-visa-policy-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-11-15 00:00:00",
        "title": "Confusing new visa policy",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Confusing new visa policy Over the last months, the Ministry for Tourism and Culture invested substantial amounts of money on international television as well as four-page full-color ads in the International Herald Tribune in order to promote Indonesia as a tourist destination. At the same time however, the government for rather ill- defined reasons of \"reciprocity and mutual benefit\" decided to abolish its visa-on-arrival facilities for a yet unknown number of countries starting Dec. 1, 2003.",
        "content": "<p>Confusing new visa policy<\/p>\n<p>Over the last months, the Ministry for Tourism and Culture <br>\ninvested substantial amounts of money on international television <br>\nas well as four-page full-color ads in the International Herald <br>\nTribune in order to promote Indonesia as a tourist destination.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time however, the government for rather ill-<br>\ndefined reasons of \"reciprocity and mutual benefit\" decided to <br>\nabolish its visa-on-arrival facilities for a yet unknown number <br>\nof countries starting Dec. 1, 2003.<\/p>\n<p>Incredibly enough and with only a few more weeks to go until <br>\nthe onset of the peak tourist season in December, the government <br>\nhas so far not only failed to announce which countries are to be <br>\naffected by its new visa policy but also to issue details <br>\nregarding its implementation.<\/p>\n<p>Illogically enough and for unfathomable reasons, visa-on-<br>\narrival facilities for eight European Union countries are to be <br>\nterminated whereas those of the remaining EU member countries <br>\nwould be maintained.<\/p>\n<p>In spite of its far-reaching consequences for Indonesia's <br>\ntourist industry, the issue surprisingly failed to attract any <br>\nsignificant media interest and until now, neither foreign embassy <br>\nstaff nor travel agencies are in a position to shed light on the <br>\nsubject.<\/p>\n<p>In the absence of visa-on-arrival facilities, visitors from <br>\naffected countries would have to undergo cumbersome visa <br>\napplication procedures prior to their departure and it is <br>\nanybody's guess how many of these would opt for more welcoming <br>\nand hassle-free tourist destinations instead!<\/p>\n<p>The visa-on-arrival policy has worked perfectly well over the <br>\npast years and no tangible benefits, if any, could be achieved by <br>\nits discontinuation.<\/p>\n<p>The introduction of \"visa-on-arrival fees\" would be a far more <br>\nsensible solution and also justified by the fact that most <br>\nforeign embassies in Jakarta are charging Indonesian applicants <br>\n\"visa processing fees\" in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>With the Dec. 1 deadline now approaching fast, the <br>\ngovernment's new visa policy urgently needs to be clarified if <br>\nfurther confusion and damages to the country's tourist industry <br>\nare to be avoided. <br>\n <br>\nJOSEPH LOUIS SPARTZ<br>\nJakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/confusing-new-visa-policy-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}