{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1302031,
        "msgid": "choose-truth-rather-than-a-side-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-05-03 00:00:00",
        "title": "Choose truth, rather than a side",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Choose truth, rather than a side By Mia Doornaert The Jakarta Post joins the commemoration of World Press Freedom Day on May 3 by looking at the media in areas of conflict and areas post-conflict. Two articles, one on page 4, the other on page 5 were distributed to the press by the advisory group on press freedom of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNITED NATIONS: It's so easy to be balanced and sensible about other people's conflicts.",
        "content": "<p>Choose truth, rather than a side<\/p>\n<p>By Mia Doornaert<\/p>\n<p>The Jakarta Post joins the commemoration of World Press Freedom<br>\nDay on May 3 by looking at the media in areas of conflict and<br>\nareas post-conflict. Two articles, one on page 4, the other on<br>\npage 5 were distributed to the press by the advisory group on<br>\npress freedom of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and<br>\nCultural Organization.<\/p>\n<p>UNITED NATIONS: It&apos;s so easy to be balanced and sensible about<br>\nother people&apos;s conflicts. We look at strife and conflict between<br>\nethnic or cultural or social groups far away and wonder why they<br>\ndon&apos;t just talk to each other and find a way to live peacefully<br>\ntogether.<\/p>\n<p>But it&apos;s a totally different story when the problems are our<br>\nown. Tolerance and critical distance tend to give way to a much<br>\nsimpler approach: us (the good guys) against them (the bad guys).<\/p>\n<p>This phenomenon can be seen everywhere. The same people who<br>\nmarch for peace and tolerance elsewhere are often extremely<br>\nintolerant when it comes to conflicts in their own part of the<br>\nworld. Outsiders who encourage them to be more tolerant are<br>\nwritten off as busybodies, who either don&apos;t have the first idea<br>\nabout the local situation or have been brainwashed by the other<br>\nside.<\/p>\n<p>Journalists are not different in this from anyone else.<br>\nNothing is more difficult for them than to report on a conflict<br>\ninvolving their own country, nation or group. National or<br>\ncultural identification may often be a largely unconscious drive,<br>\nit is nonetheless a powerful one.<\/p>\n<p>Journalists therefore face a huge challenge when they try to<br>\nmaintain a critical distance about conflict at home, because they<br>\nthemselves are so much a part of one of the sides. Too many of<br>\nthem feel that their first duty is to their own side, rather than<br>\nto the professional ethics.<\/p>\n<p>Apart from this personal involvement, journalists are also<br>\nunder considerable emotional pressure from their readers or<br>\nviewers. What may be good, balanced reporting elsewhere can<br>\nquickly become betrayal if applied at home.<\/p>\n<p>Most people do not enjoy having their staunch beliefs and<br>\nprejudices undermined and they tend to see the media&apos;s purpose as<br>\nrallying to the cause, cheering the home side on to victory, as<br>\nin a sports game.<\/p>\n<p>In the Balkans and elsewhere, many journalists who attempted<br>\nto report events in a way that was fair on all the actors in the<br>\nconflict have had to go in hiding, for fear of the wrath of their<br>\nown compatriots.<\/p>\n<p>But even under those demanding conditions, journalism is still<br>\nabout information, about getting the facts out. The reporter&apos;s<br>\njob is to choose the truth, not a side, however painful it may be<br>\nto open one&apos;s mind to the arguments and motives of the &quot;enemy&quot;.<br>\nProfessional ethics cannot be pushed aside just because the going<br>\ngets rough.<\/p>\n<p>Truthful, balanced reporting doesn&apos;t mean that the media are<br>\nnot free to choose a side in their editorial line. To quote the<br>\nwell known basic rule: facts are sacred, comment is free.<\/p>\n<p>But editorial comment needs to be based on facts. Propaganda<br>\nand hate speech -- which, for example, contributed so much to the<br>\nslaughter in Rwanda -- have nothing whatsoever to do with<br>\njournalism or with the freedom of the press.<\/p>\n<p>Journalists from outside the conflict area face different<br>\nchallenges. Simply having eyes and ears is not enough to be able<br>\nto see and hear what is really going on. Unless they are aware of<br>\nthe history and culture of the region they are assigned to, even<br>\nthe best intentioned reporters can misread a situation and easily<br>\nfall prey to propaganda.<\/p>\n<p>As UNESCO Constitution quite rightly says, wars begin in the<br>\nminds of people and therefore the search for peace also begins in<br>\ntheir minds.<\/p>\n<p>Men and women of good will who strive for peace need hard<br>\nfacts to work with. Only solid information can help them<br>\ndetermine what the parties involved need to reach a settlement<br>\nand end their conflict. Reporters who choose the truth instead of<br>\nsides, not only put their ethics into practice; they also further<br>\nthe cause of peace.<\/p>\n<p>This kind of journalism presupposes a great many things:<br>\nReporters who are firm followers of professional ethics and have<br>\nthe cultural background necessary to understand the events they<br>\nare covering; media and press organizations willing to invest in<br>\nmore than a &quot;three day fireman&quot; whose only interest is in<br>\nreporting bloodshed; and, of course, access to theaters of<br>\nconflict.<\/p>\n<p>Everywhere in the world, journalists from both inside and<br>\noutside areas of conflict, are denied access, with a litany of<br>\nexcuses: they are inflaming the conflict, exaggerating the<br>\nissues, favoring one side against the other, and so on.<br>\nPerversely enough, quite often these charges are true. The<br>\npresence of witnesses may well benefit parties in a conflict who<br>\nwere previously &apos;invisible&apos;, while it may hamper those who had<br>\nbeen hoping to be able to oppress and kill with complete<br>\nimpunity.<\/p>\n<p>So, the interest shown by journalists and the access accorded<br>\nto them will bring about at least one major consequence: there<br>\nwill be a record. The stories of the victims of violence will not<br>\ngo untold.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the mere presence of journalists cannot bring an end to<br>\nconflict, nor should it be expected to do so. They cannot be held<br>\naccountable for the way public opinion inside or outside the area<br>\nof conflict reacts to what they report.<\/p>\n<p>Contrary to a widespread belief, the media -- at least in<br>\ndemocratic or relatively open societies -- do not control the<br>\nminds of their readers or viewers.<\/p>\n<p>Their job is to enlighten them. And nowhere is that job more<br>\nimportant than when covering conflicts, because getting facts out<br>\nhelps to give the voice of reason a chance to rise above the<br>\nsound and fury of prejudice and hatred.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is the president of UNESCO&apos;s advisory group on<br>\npress freedom and a correspondent of the Belgium publication De<br>\nStandaard in France.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/choose-truth-rather-than-a-side-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}