{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1238478,
        "msgid": "china-and-the-wto-teaching-ri-some-lessons-1447893297",
        "date": "2002-02-24 00:00:00",
        "title": "China and the WTO: Teaching RI some lessons",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "China and the WTO: Teaching RI some lessons Hans W. Vriens, Contributor, Jakarta China and the WTO, Changing China, Changing World Trade By Supachai Panitchpakdi and Mark L. Clifford John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, 2002 US$21.95 Since I moved from Hong Kong to Jakarta two years ago I have been struck by the extent to which developments in China are misunderstood in Indonesia.",
        "content": "<p>China and the WTO: Teaching RI some lessons<\/p>\n<p>Hans W. Vriens, Contributor, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>China and the WTO, Changing China, Changing World Trade<br>\nBy Supachai Panitchpakdi and Mark L. Clifford<br>\nJohn Wiley &amp; Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, 2002<br>\nUS$21.95<\/p>\n<p>Since I moved from Hong Kong to Jakarta two years ago I have been<br>\nstruck by the extent to which developments in China are<br>\nmisunderstood in Indonesia.<\/p>\n<p>Even respected analysts in Jakarta regularly ventilate ill-<br>\nformed opinions like, \"China is much more corrupt than Indonesia\"<br>\nor \"China's economy is a mess similar to Indonesia's. As a result<br>\nBeijing will never succeed in reforming its state-owned<br>\ncompanies\", and finally, \"the court-system in China is just as<br>\ncorrupt as in Indonesia\".<\/p>\n<p>I would advise all those analysts to pack their bags and spend<br>\na few months in China or, second-best, read this recently<br>\npublished book. Written by Dr. Supachai Panitchpakdi, the<br>\nincoming director-general of the World Trade Organization (WTO)<br>\nand Mark L. Clifford, the Hong Kong-based Asia Editor for<br>\nBusinessWeek, it is a must read for anybody who cares about the<br>\neconomic future of Indonesia.<\/p>\n<p>For the rest of Asia, and Indonesia in particular, China's<br>\neconomic rise and its accession to the WTO should be a resounding<br>\nwake-up call. To put it in perspective: No country in history has<br>\nburst onto the world trading stage like China. It was less than a<br>\nquarter-century ago, in December 1978 to be precise, that China's<br>\nleaders first adopted their initial economic reform program of<br>\nwhat was then a state-control-led economy.<\/p>\n<p>Rising powers are inevitably disruptive to the existing order.<br>\nChina's rise to become an economic powerhouse promises to be very<br>\ndisruptive for Southeast Asia and Indonesia in particular.<\/p>\n<p>A bellwether event for Indonesia will be the elimination of<br>\nquotas on garments and textiles (the Agreement on Textiles and<br>\nClothing) at the end of 2004. A highly productive army of Chinese<br>\nwill be producing even more goods, more cheaply than ever before.<br>\nWorld Bank studies show that Chinese apparel production is<br>\nexpected to nearly quadruple in the coming decade. The export<br>\nnumbers look even more staggering.<\/p>\n<p>Its share of the total world export market will surge to more<br>\nthan 47 percent compared with 15 percent in 1997. In others<br>\nwords, nearly half of all exported clothing will be made in China<br>\nin 10 years time. One will find the same kind of scary statistics<br>\nin other sectors such as computers and electronics. Most toys are<br>\nalready produced in China.<\/p>\n<p>One wonders what Indonesia's strategic plan is to deal with<br>\nthis potential onslaught on its labor-intensive industries like<br>\napparel and footwear. One wonders.<\/p>\n<p>I have seen no proof that Indonesian policymakers are acting<br>\non what looks like a ticking economic time bomb. Rather the<br>\nopposite. A 39 percent rise in the minimum wage and policies that<br>\nmake it very difficult and expensive to lay off staff seem<br>\ndesigned to make the labor-intensive industries throw in the<br>\ntowel and run for the exit.<\/p>\n<p>On top of that the introduction of regional autonomy has led<br>\nin some places to a premanisasi of local politics -- that is rule<br>\nby mafia-style corrupt local officials.<\/p>\n<p>One of the few people in Indonesia who fully comprehends the<br>\ndisruptive rise of China is Secretary-General of the Association<br>\nof Southeast Nations (ASEAN) Rodolfo Severino Jr. He has pushed<br>\nASEAN into introduction of the Asean Free Trade Area (AFTA) by<br>\nits six original members. Although a brilliant move, Southeast<br>\nAsia's weakness in education, questions about the consistency of<br>\nits policies and the quality of its political leadership continue<br>\nto be of concern to investors.<\/p>\n<p>As a result China now dominates the investments flows, while<br>\nSoutheast Asia receives just a trickle. Twelve years ago it was<br>\nexactly the opposite.<\/p>\n<p>It is clear that China's WTO entry has not been a catalyst for<br>\nreform in Indonesia to meet the China-challenge. Proof to what<br>\nextent this phenomenon is misunderstood, was the speech delivered<br>\nby President Megawati Soekarnoputri at the opening of the AFTA<br>\n2002 Symposium in Jakarta on Jan. 31. Instead of embracing AFTA<br>\nas the best way to make the Indonesian economy more competitive,<br>\nthe President spoke about free trade as if were a zero-sum game<br>\nand why Indonesia should be able to opt out of ASEAN free trade<br>\narrangements.<\/p>\n<p>The last one to try this route was Fidel Castro, not really a<br>\nforward-looking leader.<\/p>\n<p>To come back to misunderstandings about China that I mentioned<br>\nin the beginning, yes, there is corruption in China. However,<br>\nChinese leaders understand their legitimacy depends on rooting<br>\nout corruption and achieving high economic growth. Proof of this<br>\nis that none of the top leaders in China is corrupt. Neither are<br>\ninstitutions like customs and the police.<\/p>\n<p>A corrupt mayor like those who operate in Indonesia would have<br>\nbeen arrested, put on trial and executed in China. And that all<br>\nin one day. The Chinese government likes setting examples.  Or as<br>\nthe Chinese say, \"Kill the chicken to scare the monkeys\".<\/p>\n<p>True, China's state-owned sector still has a long way to go.<br>\nIronically that is one of the reasons the Chinese premier Zhu<br>\nRongji was so eager to join the WTO. Joining this rules-based<br>\ninternational organization will put additional pressure on China<br>\nto speed up its reforms.<\/p>\n<p>True, the Chinese court system is far from perfect, but it too<br>\nhas come a long way. Foreign investors would not hesitate to<br>\nstart legal proceedings against a Chinese party. Compare this to<br>\nIndonesia where foreign investors by definition lose in court<br>\nbecause they cannot and will not participate an auction.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the ultimate irony is to what extent the economic and<br>\npolitical crisis in Indonesia has been studied in China. The<br>\nconclusion in Beijing is that an economy based on crony-<br>\ncapitalism has to be avoided at all costs. That is a lesson<br>\nIndonesia hasn't learned yet.<\/p>\n<p>The reviewer is managing director of PT APCO Indonesia, a<br>\nwholly owned subsidiary of APCO Worldwide, a Washington D.C.-<br>\nbased global public affairs (political risk and government<br>\nrelations) and strategic communications (high-level PR) firm.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/china-and-the-wto-teaching-ri-some-lessons-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}