{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1966370,
        "msgid": "charlie-chandra-clarifies-land-deed-forgery-case-1788843167",
        "date": "2026-09-08 10:45:42",
        "title": "Charlie Chandra Clarifies Land Deed Forgery Case",
        "author": "",
        "source": "DETIK",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Legal",
        "summary": "Charlie Chandra, convicted of falsifying land documents relating to a plot in Lemo Village, Tangerang, has clarified that the disputed document is not the freehold certificate (SHM) but a BPN form recording inheritance transfer. He was initially sentenced to four years, reduced to one year on appeal by the Banten High Court. He cited civil rulings and testimony from a BPN official to argue the land remains validly registered under his father's name.",
        "content": "<p>Charlie Chandra, who has been convicted in a land document forgery\ncase, has clarified the matter concerning land documents in Lemo\nVillage, Teluknaga, Tangerang Regency. Charlie Chandra stated that the\ndisputed document is not related to an SHM or Certificate of Freehold\nTitle, but rather to Annex 13, which is a National Land Agency (BPN)\nform.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe document disputed in this criminal case is not SHM Number\n5\/Lemo, but the information in Annex 13, namely a BPN form for recording\nthe transfer of title due to inheritance,\u201d said Charlie Chandra in his\nstatement delivered through his right of reply, as received on Wednesday\n(7\/9\/2026).<\/p>\n<p>Charlie Chandra explained that the BPN form was provided by the\nTangerang Regency Land Office and had been filled in and signed by\nSukamto as the PPAT (Land Deed Official) acting as attorney-in-fact for\nCharlie Chandra. In this case, Charlie Chandra was sentenced to four\nyears in prison after being found to have participated in the\nfalsification of documents.<\/p>\n<p>The case then proceeded to the appeal stage, where the Banten High\nCourt reduced the sentence to one year in prison. Charlie Chandra\u2019s\ninvolvement in the case related to the filling in of the BPN form, which\ncontained untrue information.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the transfer of ownership by sale from The Pit Nio to\nChairil Widjaja and then to Sumitra Chandra as Charlie Chandra\u2019s father,\nCharlie Chandra\u2019s side asserted that it was lawful based on a civil\ncourt ruling. However, the ruling of the appeal panel of judges at the\nBanten High Court stated otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>Charlie Chandra also referred to the testimony of Aries, an employee\nof the Regional Office of the National Land Agency of Banten Province,\nholding the position of Coordinator of the Substantive Group for the\nDetermination of Land and Space Rights in the Field of Rights\nDetermination and Registration, at the hearing on 18 November 2025, in\naccordance with Tangerang District Court Decision No 1805\/Pid.B\/2025\/PN\nTng. At that time, Aries, according to Charlie Chandra, explained that\nthe land book data at the Tangerang Regency Land Office stated that SHM\nNumber 5\/Lemo was registered and still valid under the name of Sumita\nChandra, covering an area of 87,100 square metres.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/charlie-chandra-clarifies-land-deed-forgery-case-1788843167",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}