{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1414678,
        "msgid": "change-becomes-daily-phenomenon-1447893297",
        "date": "1999-09-01 00:00:00",
        "title": "Change becomes daily phenomenon",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Change becomes daily phenomenon I read with interest the article Toward a true unitary nation by Mr. Harkiman Racheman in The Jakarta Post, Aug. 3, 1999 and would like to comment. * It has never crossed my mind to \"ban all Chinese culture in Indonesia\" as alleged in the article. Who am I to dare have such wild ideas? Perhaps someone misunderstood my suggestion that Indonesian of Chinese ethnicity should concentrate on their \"Indonesianness\" instead on their \"Chineseness\".",
        "content": "<p>Change becomes daily phenomenon<\/p>\n<p>I read with interest the article Toward a true unitary nation<br>\nby Mr. Harkiman Racheman in The Jakarta Post, Aug. 3, 1999 and<br>\nwould like to comment.<\/p>\n<p>* It has never crossed my mind to \"ban all Chinese culture in<br>\nIndonesia\" as alleged in the article. Who am I to dare have such<br>\nwild ideas? Perhaps someone misunderstood my suggestion that<br>\nIndonesian of Chinese ethnicity should concentrate on their<br>\n\"Indonesianness\" instead on their \"Chineseness\". As we know, in<br>\nthe eyes of their indigenous fellow citizens, ethnic Chinese are<br>\nstill aliens and \"not belonging to us\". Giving priority to<br>\nIndonesianness will certainly help to come closer to the people<br>\nat grassroots level. This is of course my personal view. And<br>\nindeed, I represent nobody but myself. In fact, it applies to all<br>\nmy thinking and stance with regard to our domestic Chinese<br>\nproblem.<\/p>\n<p>* Mr. Harkiman also made remarks on my so-called \"abandonment of<br>\nChinese religious and cultural background\" which he looked upon<br>\ncynically. I will not discuss whether his allegations are true or<br>\nnot but would rather comment in a general sense, instead of from<br>\na personal angle.<\/p>\n<p>In my view \"abandoning\" something , changing traditions,<br>\nattitudes etc, are daily phenomena, happening nowadays as well as<br>\nin the past or future. In former times quite a number of Chinese<br>\nimmigrants were even assimilated into the Javanese nobility and<br>\nthen highly honored. This was also the case with the Nine Holy<br>\nSaints (Walisongo), some of whom were from Chinese descent. It is<br>\nobvious that they all have abandoned \"their Chinese religious and<br>\ncultural backgrounds\".<\/p>\n<p>Nowadays the same is true with ethnic Chinese from Indonesia<br>\nemigrating to Western countries. Their mother tongue is<br>\nIndonesian (since World War II most of them do not speak Chinese<br>\nanymore) and they have more or less a religious Chinese and<br>\ncultural background. But these so-called Peranakan Chinese and<br>\ntheir offspring in daily life immediately speak the language and<br>\nfollow the traditions of their newly adopted country. Moreover,<br>\nthe majority even converts to nonChinese religions and customs<br>\nShould we look upon these people with their new attitudes<br>\ncynically and with disgust since they have \"abandoned\" old values<br>\nfrom the past? I think we should be wiser.<\/p>\n<p>*As to the allegation about my evil influence on the government,<br>\nI think that the author gave me too much \"credit\". Prof Dr.<br>\nStuart Greif in his book Indonesians of Chinese Origin (1988)<br>\nstated that the solution of the Chinese problem was in fact<br>\noutlined at the Army Seminar in 1966. Further laws and rules were<br>\nderived from this seminar. However, I was unfortunately (or<br>\nfortunately?) not a participant.<\/p>\n<p>* In Siauw Giok Tjhan, a book written by his son Siauw Tiong Djin<br>\nmore than 600,000 were members of Baperki (page 372). This means<br>\none out of four ethnic Chinese in 1965 were members. We further<br>\nknow that the above organization was banned since there was a<br>\nstrong indication being involved in the September 1965 coup. This<br>\nfact strengthened the already existing antiChinese mood.<br>\nAccording to Prof Stuart Greif of New Zealand it is to the credit<br>\nof the military men and civilians who created the New Order that<br>\nthey resisted the temptation to solve the Chinese problem by<br>\nmassive expulsion such as was applied by communist Vietnam 10<br>\nyears later with their boat people. It is also a credit to the<br>\naverage Indonesian who is basically tolerant.<\/p>\n<p>With consolidation of power, the New Order government later<br>\nembarked upon a program of rational economic development with the<br>\nChinese of Indonesia as their assistants. And honor to whom honor<br>\nis due: we should be grateful to the Military for this peaceful<br>\ncourse of history.<\/p>\n<p>H. JUNUS JAHJA<\/p>\n<p>Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/change-becomes-daily-phenomenon-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}