{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1443678,
        "msgid": "breaking-the-old-taboo-1447893297",
        "date": "1999-04-14 00:00:00",
        "title": "Breaking the old taboo",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Breaking the old taboo One would think there was no other document on this planet more sacred than Indonesia's 1945 Constitution, which still plays a role as the very source of Indonesian laws. The historic legacy of our founding fathers is also said to be the only road that leads to a just and prosperous society. That is what this nation has been told for decades.",
        "content": "<p>Breaking the old taboo<\/p>\n<p>One would think there was no other document on this planet<br>\nmore sacred than Indonesia's 1945 Constitution, which still plays<br>\na role as the very source of Indonesian laws. The historic legacy<br>\nof our founding fathers is also said to be the only road that<br>\nleads to a just and prosperous society.<\/p>\n<p>That is what this nation has been told for decades. We have<br>\nalso been led to believe that the country could face a calamity<br>\nif it betrays the spirit of the Constitution or tries to amend<br>\nit.<\/p>\n<p>However, the reality is a tragic irony. The precious concept<br>\n-- after experiencing an initial lull during the turbulent years<br>\nof revolution between 1945 and 1949 -- was later humiliated and<br>\nabused by both the successive Old Order and New Order regimes of<br>\npresidents Sukarno and Soeharto respectively for their own ends.<\/p>\n<p>In 1950, when Indonesia decided to have a taste of western<br>\ndemocracy, the 1945 Constitution was forced into retirement. It<br>\nwas replaced by a more elaborate provisional constitution, which<br>\nwas meant to last until a democratic general election, the first<br>\nthis country would have.<\/p>\n<p>A democratic poll was held in 1955 and produced a new<br>\nparliament and constituent Assembly. But the Assembly bumbled<br>\nalong for years with little success in drafting a new<br>\nconstitution. President Sukarno -- who had been made mere a<br>\nfigurehead in 1950 and had been impatiently waiting for a chance<br>\nto jump into the political scene -- used his constitutional right<br>\nto dissolve the Assembly and declare the reactivation of the 1945<br>\nConstitution.<\/p>\n<p>Everything would have been all right if his maneuver had been<br>\nsincere. But trouble ensued when he introduced his style of<br>\n\"guided democracy\", which was nothing but another term for<br>\ndictatorship.<\/p>\n<p>His rule, during which he flirted with the communists, finally<br>\npushed the nation toward the Crocodile Hole, the dry well into<br>\nwhich the bodies of leading Army generals were dumped during the<br>\ncommunist coup attempt in 1965.<\/p>\n<p>President Soeharto, who took over from the flamboyant founding<br>\nfather in 1966, declared that the root of all evils was Sukarno's<br>\nviolation of the 1945 Constitution. He promised to redress the<br>\nsituation and implement the Constitution sincerely.<\/p>\n<p>However, his three-decade iron-fisted rule was history<br>\nrepeating itself in a more horrendous way. Last year he stepped<br>\ndown in disgrace, leaving the nation on the brink of an economic<br>\nand political calamity. But at least his fall paved the way for<br>\ndemocracy.<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, Dr. Nurcholish Madjid, a noted scholar and<br>\nthoughtful political observer, reminded Indonesians in an<br>\ninterview with Kompas daily that the most pivotal task of this<br>\nnation today is to amend the 1945 Constitution. His statement is<br>\nin fact nothing new and the Constitution itself stipulates that<br>\namendments simply need the backing of two-thirds of the People's<br>\nConsultative Assembly (MPR), the highest constitutional body.<\/p>\n<p>Only in the past, the rulers  -- especially Soeharto -- always<br>\nbranded the idea a dangerous subversive virus, while raising his<br>\nfinger to \"right wing extremists:\" Muslim politicians.<\/p>\n<p>Soeharto in 1985 had his House of Representatives rubber stamp<br>\na bill that made it possible to make constitutional amendments,<br>\nalthough such rulings are not written in the 1945 Constitution.<br>\nWith the obstructive law repealed in March, the door for<br>\nconstitutional changes has been opened wide.<\/p>\n<p>Although the nation is still making preparations for the June<br>\ngeneral election and the formation of a new MPR will not take<br>\nplace before September, Nurcholish's statement is relevant.<\/p>\n<p>We understand it as a warning to people of the nation to be<br>\ncareful in their choice in the general election. If they choose<br>\nthe pro-status quo political power, they can expect not only<br>\nfurther abuses of the 1945 Constitution, but also another<br>\ncatastrophe which would be more suicidal than before.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/breaking-the-old-taboo-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}