{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1490810,
        "msgid": "bmaintaining-peace-1447899208",
        "date": "2004-05-08 00:00:00",
        "title": "[b]Maintaining peace",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Maintaining peace in hostile places The letter by David Jardine (The Jakarta Post, April 30), triggered some thoughts that have been haunting me for a few years. What I feel is that while there are both good and bad soldiers, what is crystal-clear is that the job they are entrusted to do while dealing with civilians is unenviable and most difficult.",
        "content": "<p>Maintaining peace<br>\nin hostile places<\/p>\n<p>The letter by David Jardine (The Jakarta Post, April 30),  <br>\ntriggered some thoughts that have been haunting me for a few <br>\nyears. What I feel is that while there are both good and bad <br>\nsoldiers, what is crystal-clear is that the job they are <br>\nentrusted to do while dealing with civilians is unenviable and <br>\nmost difficult.   For one thing, they may face rebels who outnumber them many <br>\ntimes over, irrespective of whether you choose to call them <br>\nterrorists or freedom-fighters, depending on which side of the <br>\nfence you are. The soldiers may have superior weapons, but unlike <br>\nin a war, they do not know whom to aim these weapons at! The <br>\nrebels may kill thousands of innocent people and get away with <br>\nit, but let a soldier kill one single innocent person and the <br>\nmedia will descend on him like a ton of bricks!   On top of that, they are always susceptible to attack and to <br>\nbeing killed by a sniper choosing to shoot from behind an <br>\ninnocent pedestrian! So when a soldier doesn't know how long he <br>\nhas before his life could be snuffed out and makes some mistakes <br>\nby way of knee-jerk reactions, that deserves some sympathetic <br>\nconsideration. These knee-jerk reactions occur without the <br>\nknowledge of their top commanders because most of the time they <br>\naren't there and there is simply no time to communicate with <br>\nthem!   What is shown on TV or what is published in the print media as <br>\npart of news coverage may be part of the truth, but not the whole <br>\ntruth, because when one talks of \"press freedom\", it generally <br>\nrefers to the \"freedom of press barons\" or editors and not <br>\nfreedom of reporters, whose convictions or sympathies may or may <br>\nnot be the same as those of the owners of a particular TV channel <br>\nor newspaper.   The history of mankind is largely written by the victors. One <br>\nshould have no doubt about what the story of the Second World War <br>\nwould have been had Hitler won it. Or who would have been tried <br>\nand convicted of war crimes at the Nuremberg trials.   In my opinion, while armchair theorization is fine, the reality <br>\nof life and death faced by the soldiers in very hostile civilian <br>\nenvironments should not be overlooked and their actions should be <br>\nviewed in a more comprehensive way.<br>\nK. B. KALEJakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/bmaintaining-peace-1447899208",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}