{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1214367,
        "msgid": "between-feudalism-and-democracy-1447893297",
        "date": "1995-04-06 00:00:00",
        "title": "Between feudalism and democracy",
        "author": null,
        "source": "",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Between feudalism and democracy By Mochtar Buchori JAKARTA (JP): At a seminar I attended in the United States recently, the questions I was asked by the audience were most often about democracy. In essence, people asked why the democratization process in Indonesia had been proceeding at such a slow pace. Inevitably, this question triggered further inquiries about other thorny issues, such as human rights, the labor movement, freedom of the press, and the like.",
        "content": "<p>Between feudalism and democracy<\/p>\n<p>By Mochtar Buchori<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): At a seminar I attended in the United States<br>\nrecently, the questions I was asked by the audience were most<br>\noften about democracy. In essence, people asked why the<br>\ndemocratization process in Indonesia had been proceeding at such<br>\na slow pace. Inevitably, this question triggered further<br>\ninquiries about other thorny issues, such as human rights, the<br>\nlabor movement, freedom of the press, and the like.<\/p>\n<p>In my search for the wisest possible answer -- mind you, the<br>\nIndonesian ambassador was there in the audience most of the time<br>\n-- I used a standard excuse which I learned from a Thai colleague<br>\nback in 1991. We were then on a tour of Germany, and on our<br>\nagenda was a meeting with parliamentarians from the newly-<br>\nreunited Germany. These German politicians asked the same<br>\nquestions about democratization in Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n<p>My Thai colleague gave this splendid explanation: \"In<br>\nSoutheast Asia we are courting democracy, but we are still<br>\nmarried to feudalism. As long as we have not succeeded in<br>\ndivorcing feudalism, we will never be able to implement democracy<br>\nin its fullest form.\"<\/p>\n<p>In replying to my audience in the United States I said that<br>\nthe result of this wavering state of mind was that, at the<br>\nmoment, most people in Indonesia exhibited a mixture of feudal<br>\nand democratic characteristics. I call a person with such a blend<br>\na \"feudal democrat\".<\/p>\n<p>I added that, while this may sound funny, in reality it is not<br>\neasy to be a good feudal democrat. You have to know when<br>\ndemocratic behavior is called for, and when feudalistic behavior<br>\nis more appropriate. A wrong decision in this regard can cause a<br>\npersonal disaster. I said that, as a rule, one should not be too<br>\ndemocratic when one is dealing with government bureaucrats,<br>\nwhile, on the other hand, one should refrain from any inclination<br>\ntowards feudalistic behavior when dealing with people from NGO's<br>\nor feminist organizations.<\/p>\n<p>To fend off further questions about democracy that I might not<br>\nhave been able to answer wisely, I hastily added that what was<br>\nmore important than the question about the present state of<br>\ndemocracy was the question about the future of democracy in<br>\nIndonesia. Does democracy really have a future in Indonesia?<\/p>\n<p>I stated my absolute belief in a more democratic future for<br>\nthe country. What I did not elaborate on at the time was the way<br>\nin which this fuller and more mature democracy was likely to<br>\nevolve.<\/p>\n<p>Will the fading away of the old generation and the rise of the<br>\nyoung generation automatically bring about a fuller and more<br>\nmature democracy in our society?<\/p>\n<p>Viewed in the light of this kind of question, I have to admit<br>\nthat my remark about the prospects of democracy in Indonesia was<br>\nrather weak and could easily be repudiated. There is no guarantee<br>\nwhatsoever that the next generations of Indonesians will become<br>\nmore democratic. Less feudalistic perhaps, yes. But this does not<br>\nnecessarily mean that they will become more democratic. It is<br>\nalso quite possible that the loosening of feudalistic restraints<br>\nwill bring about, not democracy as well as order based on new<br>\nnorms, but chaos and irresponsibility.<\/p>\n<p>I think that the only sure path towards a more democratic<br>\nfuture is education which is truly democratic, and not merely<br>\nnominally democratic. It is only if and when each younger<br>\ngeneration is educated in a way that is more democratic than the<br>\none provided to the preceding generation that this nation will<br>\nbecome increasingly more democratic.<\/p>\n<p>It is in this regard that I felt -- and still feel -- deeply<br>\nhorrified when I read in a magazine some time ago that, in<br>\nresponse to a student demand for more democratic and less<br>\nbureaucratic management in a private school in East Java, the<br>\nchairman of the board responded curtly that \"... in this school<br>\nthere is no democracy and also no bureaucracy. There are only<br>\nregulations here, and anyone unwilling to observe any of the<br>\nexisting regulations can pack his or her belongings and get an<br>\neducation somewhere else.\"<\/p>\n<p>In an environment dominated by this kind of attitude, is it<br>\npossible to prepare students to become democratic citizens for<br>\nthe future?<\/p>\n<p>The writer is rector of the IKIP-Muhammadiyah Teachers<br>\nTraining College, Jakarta.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/between-feudalism-and-democracy-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}