{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1377222,
        "msgid": "banking-crisis-whos-to-blame-1447893297",
        "date": "1998-09-08 00:00:00",
        "title": "Banking crisis: Who's to blame?",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Banking crisis: Who's to blame? By Eddy Soeparno JAKARTA (JP): Many Indonesians find it difficult to accept that the economic crisis has changed their lifestyle -- as well as their status, notably from being employed to unemployed -- in a matter of months. As late as July 1997, the World Bank announced that the Indonesian economy was \"performing very well\" and had a chance to maintain an annual growth of about 7.5 percent in coming years.",
        "content": "<p>Banking crisis: Who's to blame?<\/p>\n<p>By Eddy Soeparno<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): Many Indonesians find it difficult to accept<br>\nthat the economic crisis has changed their lifestyle -- as well<br>\nas their status, notably from being employed to unemployed -- in<br>\na matter of months.<\/p>\n<p>As late as July 1997, the World Bank announced that the<br>\nIndonesian economy was \"performing very well\" and had a chance to<br>\nmaintain an annual growth of about 7.5 percent in coming years.<br>\nNow it says the nation is \"near economic collapse\" and is in a<br>\n\"desperate\" situation that \"spells immense dangers and<br>\ndifficulties\" for its 202 million people.<\/p>\n<p>Much of the blame is pointed at the banking sector, which over<br>\nthe past three years had become a hotbed of speculation for<br>\nbusiness owners -- including bank owners. Speculative bubbles,<br>\nespecially in the real estate sector, were effectively nurtured<br>\nby continuous flows of bank credit which artificially lifted<br>\nasset prices as well as demand. As a result, the prices of these<br>\nassets soared, attracting even more investments into the sector.<\/p>\n<p>Because Asia's economies were growing at a very fast pace, the<br>\nnegative impact of this type of resource allocation was not<br>\nimmediately apparent. However at the end of the day, these assets<br>\nbecame so inflated that a price correction was simply inevitable.<br>\nBut it came too late -- forcing a full, immediate correction<br>\nrather than a gradual, less painful one.<\/p>\n<p>When the market finally realized the actual value and demand<br>\nof these assets, a significant gap between the value of the loans<br>\nand the value of the real estate backing them had already<br>\noccurred. Soon after that, the entire house of cards came<br>\ntumbling down as property prices went into a free fall and<br>\noverdue bank portfolios began to swell, while the financial<br>\nsystem virtually malfunctioned.<\/p>\n<p>Another form of speculation -- that is taking short-term loans<br>\nto finance long-term projects -- also contributed to the problems<br>\nnow faced by troubled banks. The confidence crisis in the banking<br>\nsector further triggered huge withdrawals of public funds from<br>\nthe banking system. Since most bank assets were tied up in<br>\nmedium- to long-term projects, the government -- in an effort to<br>\nstabilize the banking system -- bailed out a number of banks by<br>\nproviding immediate liquidity to meet depositor commitments.<\/p>\n<p>To date, the government has poured approximately Rp 145<br>\ntrillion (US$12 billion) into the banking sector to save it from<br>\ncollapse.<\/p>\n<p>To finance the move, however, the government actually printed<br>\nnew money, resulting in skyrocketing inflation rates up to 80<br>\npercent (projected to reach 100 percent by year end of the year),<br>\nfrom a modest single digit figure in 1997. The task of rolling<br>\nback this inflation rate has further resulted in high interest<br>\nrates of between 60 percent and 70 percent. Lending rates are<br>\ncurrently hovering between 80 percent and 90 percent, making it<br>\nvirtually impossible for banks to resume lending and disbursing<br>\nthe much needed liquidity to restart the engines of Indonesia's<br>\nfaltering economy.<\/p>\n<p>When the government realized it would have to take on the task<br>\nof salvaging and rehabilitating more banks, it summoned a team of<br>\ninternational auditors to look into the books of several troubled<br>\ninstitutions. The result was astonishing. Intercompany lending<br>\naccounted for as much as 85 percent of total loan portfolios,<br>\nwhile the amount of doubtful and bad loans at some banks<br>\nreportedly accounted for 90 percent of total assets.<\/p>\n<p>This comes as no surprise to anyone familiar with the<br>\ncountry's banking structure, mostly run and operated by owning<br>\nfamilies who normally use the bank as a vehicle to gain cheap<br>\nfunding to finance their own highly speculative projects other<br>\nbanks have refused to finance.<\/p>\n<p>The audit's findings prompted the government to pull the plug<br>\non several faltering institutions, resulting in the closure of<br>\nthree medium-sized banks. Another four banks, currently under the<br>\nIndonesian Bank Restructuring Agency's (IBRA) supervision, were<br>\ngiven until the third week of September to make good on all<br>\nobligations owed to the central bank.<\/p>\n<p>The exercise of closing and liquidating banks, however,<br>\nappears to have come at a higher price tag than previously<br>\nanticipated. First, the resulting layoffs will further eat into<br>\nthe government's pocket since it only increases the need to<br>\nmaintain its \"social safety net\" in the form of subsidies.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the move will result in tangible as well as intangible<br>\nlosses, such as the loss of customer relationships, banking<br>\nnetworks and management information systems.<\/p>\n<p>And finally, rehabilitating and selling off remaining assets<br>\nof liquidated banks is a long, cumbersome and complicated<br>\nprocess. Take French banking giant Credit Lyonnais, for instance,<br>\nwhich in 1994 set up an institution similar to the Resolution<br>\nTrust Corporation in the U.S. to sell off their non-performing<br>\nloans. To date, it has only managed to sell about 40 percent of<br>\nits total asset portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>Another matter virtually ignored throughout the crisis is the<br>\ncondition of the country's six state-owned banks. Frequently used<br>\nas a tool for politically motivated lending, the state banks were<br>\nknown to have large single portfolios of non-performing accounts<br>\neven prior to the crisis. The only reason these banks did not<br>\nfall apart is because it had vast and almost certain access to<br>\ngovernment liquidity.<\/p>\n<p>In the past, if any of these banks suffered from mounting<br>\npressure from non-performing assets or liquidity problems, the<br>\ngovernment would normally step in and inject the necessary funds<br>\nneeded.<\/p>\n<p>In practice, should the banks then fail to service these<br>\ncentral bank loans, the government would normally decide to<br>\nincrease its equity in the bank by converting its loans into<br>\ncapital.<\/p>\n<p>If economists fear that a government-led bailout of the<br>\nprivate sector would increase the problem of moral hazards, it<br>\nshould be noted that continuous government bailouts in the public<br>\nsector has already created a special kind of moral hazard<br>\nproblem, unfortunately carrying a much larger impact.<\/p>\n<p>The fact is, state banks -- either by will or \"invisible<br>\nforce\" -- have engaged in larger and riskier projects than any of<br>\ntheir private sector counterparts.<\/p>\n<p>Worse still, no state bank has ever been allowed to collapse,<br>\nno matter how large its losses.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, while pointing the finger at the state of the<br>\ncountry's private banks, we should also assess the condition of<br>\ngovernment-owned banks. The size of their portfolios is<br>\nsignificant and any problems resulting in their non-performing<br>\nloans could create another ripple in the economy.<\/p>\n<p>Long before the crisis, Indonesia's banking sector had been<br>\nwidely criticized as \"highly regulated but poorly supervised\".<br>\nThe regulatory and supervision function of the central bank<br>\nshould therefore share much of the blame for causing the banking<br>\ncrisis, along with other factors.<\/p>\n<p>Weak auditing by regulators has often resulted in inaccurate<br>\nbank reporting, which has misled the public over the actual<br>\nconditions of various banks.<\/p>\n<p>Recent investigations on the misuse of liquidity facilities to<br>\nailing banks by several former board members of the central bank<br>\nfurther indicates that corruption and collusion were partly<br>\nresponsible for the current banking chaos.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, it is of paramount importance that the central bank<br>\nenhance its supervisory role to prevent future bankers from<br>\noutsmarting regulators in judging the health of their books.<\/p>\n<p>Increased audit transparency should also be emphasized in the<br>\nwake of growing criticism from the public as well as the need to<br>\nrestore confidence in the authorities' policymaking function.<\/p>\n<p>In 1988, the liberalization of the financial sector and the<br>\nprivatization of the banking system were central to the country's<br>\nstructural reform programs.<\/p>\n<p>This, together with the availability of more resources as a<br>\nresult of fiscal consolidation and capital inflows, led to the<br>\nconsiderable growth of credit to the private sector. From 1989 to<br>\n1994, financing from private sector banks expanded at an annual<br>\nrate of 22 percent, which further prompted the central bank to<br>\nlimit credit growth by allowing banks to expand their assets by<br>\nonly 18 percent per annum in 1994.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the credit explosion occurred at a time when<br>\nthere was inadequate financial supervision and regulation by the<br>\nauthorities and before the banks could establish the necessary<br>\ninternal controls to ensure that credit would be granted<br>\nprudently.<\/p>\n<p>The results of this are evident today with the collapse of<br>\nseveral medium to large financial institutions and the discovery<br>\nof more flaws in the entire banking system.<\/p>\n<p>Salvaging the banking system has proven to be costly in the<br>\npast and it will not cost the public any less by shutting down<br>\nailing and more ailing banks.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the central bank should provide clear guidelines on<br>\nbank closures as well as increased transparency in their role as<br>\nlender of last resort to ailing banks.<\/p>\n<p>On a final note, banks are institutions in which the public<br>\nput more than just pennies and dimes into. It is trust that a<br>\nsmall time depositor extends when placing his or her lifetime<br>\nsavings into a bank. Bankers should realize this trust and reward<br>\nit with prudent policies.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a corporate finance director for American<br>\nExpress Bank.<\/p>\n<p>Window A: The exercise of closing and liquidating banks,<br>\nhowever, appears to have come at a higher price tag than<br>\npreviously anticipated.<\/p>\n<p>Window B: Weak auditing by regulators has often resulted in<br>\ninaccurate bank reporting, which has misled the public over the<br>\nactual conditions of various banks.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/banking-crisis-whos-to-blame-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}