{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1505199,
        "msgid": "bali-figures-angry-over-court-ruling-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-07-31 00:00:00",
        "title": "Bali figures angry over court ruling",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Bali figures angry over court ruling The Jakarta Post, Denpasar\/Jakarta Balinese community reacted angrily on Friday to the Constitutional Court ruling declaring Law No. 16\/2003 unconstitutional, as law experts recommended amendments to the Criminal Law Procedures Code to deal with terror suspects.",
        "content": "<p>Bali figures angry over court ruling<\/p>\n<p>The Jakarta Post, Denpasar\/Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>Balinese community reacted angrily on Friday to the<br>\nConstitutional Court ruling declaring Law No. 16\/2003<br>\nunconstitutional, as law experts recommended amendments to the<br>\nCriminal Law Procedures Code to deal with terror suspects.<\/p>\n<p>A group local figures said they will send a petition to the<br>\nPresident, the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court to<br>\nprotest the verdict, which means Bali bombing suspects currently<br>\nundergoing questioning cannot be charged under Law No. 15\/2005 on<br>\nantiterrorism as the law was enacted long after the Bali bombings<br>\non Oct. 12, 2002.<\/p>\n<p>Those who signed the petition include the prince of Puri<br>\nKesiman Denpasar Anak Agung Ngurah Kusumawardhana, counselors of<br>\nBali bombing victims, Haji Agus Bambang Prayitno -- who helped<br>\nblast victims right after the explosion -- and lecturer Putu<br>\nSuastha.<\/p>\n<p>In their statement, the group demanded dismissal of five<br>\nConstitutional Court judges who voted against the retroactivity<br>\nprinciple of the Law No. 16\/2003. The verdict of the nine-member<br>\ncourt is final and legally binding.<\/p>\n<p>Bali tourism was hit hardest by the terror attack, which<br>\nkilled 202 people.<\/p>\n<p>In Jakarta a rights activist has suggested that the government<br>\nrevise the Criminal Law Procedures Code to deal with terror<br>\nsuspects and charge them under the Criminal Code, instead of the<br>\ndraconian Antiterrorism Law.<\/p>\n<p>\"Revising the Criminal Law Procedures Code would be more<br>\napplicable than continuing to use the Antiterrorism Law,\" Munir<br>\nof the Indonesian Human Rights Watch (Imparsial) told a<br>\ndiscussion held by Judicial Watch.<\/p>\n<p>Munir said in the revision, law enforcers, such as police,<br>\ncould be given greater authority to investigate terrorist cases,<br>\nincluding detaining suspects for seven days.<\/p>\n<p>The police have complained that the Criminal Law Procedures<br>\nCode, which allows detention of suspects for only one day, is<br>\ninsufficient to deal with terror cases.<\/p>\n<p>Law No. 15\/2003 on terrorism allows the police to detain a<br>\nsuspect for up to six months without charging them. Terrorism<br>\ncarries a maximum sentence of death.<\/p>\n<p>\"If we want to heavily punish terror suspects, we could use<br>\nmany articles in the Criminal Code. Although I'm against capital<br>\npunishment, the code does carry a maximum penalty of death,\"<br>\nMunir said.<\/p>\n<p>The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional Law No.<br>\n16\/2003 on the retroactive application of Law No. 15\/2003, under<br>\nwhich all people implicated in the 2002 Bali bombings were<br>\ncharged.<\/p>\n<p>The court's ruling has raised fears that the convicts,<br>\nincluding those sentenced to death, could walk free if they file<br>\nfor a case review or appeal to a higher court.<\/p>\n<p>Munir said the court's ruling was a logical consequence of<br>\nArticle 28 (i) of the amended Constitution, which maintains a<br>\nnon-retroactivity principle in Indonesia's judicial system.<\/p>\n<p>\"It's no surprise to me. We had advised that the retroactivity<br>\nprinciple should not be recognized since it would create<br>\nproblems,\" he said.<\/p>\n<p>He said based on international human rights principles and<br>\nconventions, retroactivity can be applied in the case of<br>\nextraordinary crimes, such as war crimes, genocide and crimes<br>\nagainst humanity.<\/p>\n<p>However, Munir dismissed the idea that an act of terrorism was<br>\nan extraordinary crime, due to the unclear definition of<br>\nterrorism.<\/p>\n<p>Separately on Thursday, State Intelligence Agency (BIN)<br>\ndirector A.M. Hendropriyono said his office needed more authority<br>\nto detain terrorist suspects even before acts of terrorism<br>\noccurred.<\/p>\n<p>Citing the importance of having preemptive authority against<br>\nterrorists, Hendropriyono urged the House of Representatives to<br>\nstart deliberation of the intelligence bill.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/bali-figures-angry-over-court-ruling-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}