{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1061342,
        "msgid": "australias-john-howard-assesses-asia-1447893297",
        "date": "1996-04-23 00:00:00",
        "title": "Australia's John Howard assesses Asia",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Australia's John Howard assesses Asia By Dewi Anggraeni MELBOURNE (JP): On April 3 Alexander Downer spent half an hour with former prime minister Paul Keating, discussing a strategy suitable for Australia's engagement in Asia. A short time later, to journalists who bombarded him with questions, Downer explained that the present government recognized Keating's contacts and expertise in Asia and Asian matters.",
        "content": "<p>Australia's John Howard assesses Asia<\/p>\n<p>By Dewi Anggraeni<\/p>\n<p>MELBOURNE (JP): On April 3 Alexander Downer spent half an<br>\nhour with former prime minister Paul Keating, discussing a<br>\nstrategy suitable for Australia's engagement in Asia. A short<br>\ntime later, to journalists who bombarded him with questions,<br>\nDowner explained that the present government recognized Keating's<br>\ncontacts and expertise in Asia and Asian matters.<\/p>\n<p>The conservative Liberal-National Coalition win in the<br>\nfederal elections last month has uncovered a new cultural<br>\nlandscape in Australia, or rather, a regression, slight though it<br>\nmay be, towards the old Eurocentricism.<\/p>\n<p>While agents of change abound in Australia, it is becoming<br>\napparent that change, especially social and cultural, should not be<br>\neffected in a hurry. In 1972, Labor's PM Gough Whitlam came to power<br>\nand began to bring Australia into a new era. He cut the umbilical<br>\ncord with the United States, and resumed diplomatic recognition<br>\nof China. In 1975, sacking by the Governor General aside, he lost<br>\nthe elections to the Coalition.<\/p>\n<p>Entering the 1990s, Labor's PM Paul Keating with his remarkable<br>\nforesight, saw that economically Australia belonged in its<br>\ngeographic region, not a pathetic appendage to Britain or the<br>\nUnited States. He drove, with gusto, Australian businesses to<br>\njoin the economic regionalization. This was seen, by the ultra-<br>\nconservatives, as `Asianization'. In 1996 Keating lost the<br>\nelections to the Coalition.<\/p>\n<p>While gifted with foresight, Keating, and his ministers,<br>\nfailed to convey to the Australian population the urgency of<br>\nregionalization for Australia. It was obvious by the voters'<br>\nrejection last month that not enough of the population perceived<br>\nthe benefit of being part of a booming Asia. The push towards<br>\nAsia was seen in less than favorable light. People responded<br>\nemotionally, rather than rationally.<\/p>\n<p>In the months leading to the elections there were signs<br>\npointing to the re-energizing of the `purist' elements in<br>\nAustralia. These people are suspicious of multiculturalism,<br>\nuncomfortable with Asian migrants seemingly flooding the suburbs,<br>\nand wanted a reversal of the Asia trend in the country.<\/p>\n<p>The current prime minister, John Howard, is walking on a<br>\ntightrope. He is no doubt aware that a fair number of those who<br>\nvoted him in did so because of his stance against<br>\nmulticulturalism and misgivings about Asianization, and his<br>\nleaning towards Europe and the United States. Yet the fact is<br>\nthat economically Australia has no choice but to continue to<br>\ntrade with Asian, American and European markets, which are<br>\nbecoming less accessible by the minute.<\/p>\n<p>For a government seemingly so unprepared for the Asia push,<br>\nthe Howard government has done admirably well by securing a stop-<br>\nover visit by Malaysia's Dr. Mahathir. This was especially<br>\nsignificant since the relationship between former prime minister<br>\nKeating and Mahathir, until few moments before the elections, was<br>\nnot the best.<\/p>\n<p>On a personal level, it was very sensible. As Dr. Harold<br>\nCrouch, senior research fellow at the Australian National<br>\nUniversity observes, the gesture has sent a message to Mahathir<br>\nthat Australia regards him as significant and important. And he<br>\nwas able to accept this compliment, at no cost to himself.<\/p>\n<p>On a national level, it may have limited usefulness. It is<br>\nwell known in Malaysia, that there is an understanding that<br>\nMahathir may stand down to let his deputy Anwar Ibrahim to take<br>\nthe rein, even before the next elections. Ibrahim himself is not<br>\na stranger to Australia. He has in fact made several private<br>\nvisits to this country.<\/p>\n<p>So relationship between the two countries has always been<br>\ngood. Crouch emphasizes: \"The fundamentals of the relationship<br>\nhas never been disturbed. Educational exchange, joint military<br>\nexercise and trade, went up during the relationship crisis<br>\nbetween Keating and Mahathir. In the last three and four years<br>\ngraphs in trade went straight up. Australia is actively marketing<br>\neducation in Malaysia.\" Dr. Crouch adds that those who didn't<br>\nknow politics and only saw activities in trade and other areas<br>\nbetween Australia and Malaysia, wouldn't know there was any<br>\ncrisis.<\/p>\n<p>Malaysia is aware that it is expedient to buy Australian<br>\nmade patrol boats because they are the same models used by the<br>\nAustralian navy. This ensures that there is a guaranteed supply<br>\nof spare parts. This cannot be taken for granted with Germany and<br>\nthe U.S., who are producing patrol boats for export markets.<br>\nNaturally if they stop selling the boats, they will eventually<br>\nstop selling the parts. And with joint military exercises,<br>\ncompatibility of patrol boats is surely desirable.<\/p>\n<p>One thing the Howard government seems to have learned is,<br>\nwhatever it does, it has to have community support. In a speech<br>\nto the University of Sydney mid-February, the then Opposition<br>\nForeign Affairs spokesman, Alexander Downer, stressed that fact.<br>\nWhile stating that a Howard administration would regard<br>\nengagement with Asia as its highest foreign policy priority, the<br>\nchallenge is to ensure that the Australian public is encouraged<br>\nto support this process. \"The rhetoric of the Australian<br>\ngovernment will mean nothing if the government's strategy does<br>\nnot have widespread community support\", said Downer.<\/p>\n<p>Downer's own rhetoric then was, `Engagement with Asia, but<br>\nwith less pizzazz'. The challenge now is to clarify what that<br>\nmeans. Maintaining a low profile? Can Australia, especially this<br>\ngovernment, with its reputation of reluctance towards Asia,<br>\nafford to continue in this mode and be taken seriously in Asia?<\/p>\n<p>Taking advantage of Paul Keating's experience in dealing with<br>\nAPEC and the region may be a step in the right direction for the<br>\nHoward government.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a freelance journalist based in Melbourne.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/australias-john-howard-assesses-asia-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}