{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1980382,
        "msgid": "asset-forfeiture-bill-why-is-it-important-for-fighting-corruption-1789455352",
        "date": "2026-09-15 12:44:01",
        "title": "Asset Forfeiture Bill: Why is it important for fighting corruption?",
        "author": "",
        "source": "ANTARA_ID",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Legal",
        "summary": "The Asset Forfeiture Bill, under discussion for over a decade, has been prioritised again in 2026 with the House of Representatives targeting its completion by December 2026. The bill would strengthen the recovery of criminal proceeds through non-conviction based forfeiture, complementing existing corruption and money laundering laws and Indonesia's commitment to the UN Convention Against Corruption. Civil society groups support the bill but stress the need for transparency and safeguards against arbitrary asset seizure.",
        "content": "<p>Jakarta (ANTARA) \u2014 Fighting corruption is not only about punishing\nperpetrators, but also about ensuring that assets derived from criminal\nacts are returned to the state. For this reason, the Asset Forfeiture\nBill has once again come into focus within Indonesia\u2019s anti-corruption\nagenda.<\/p>\n<p>The Asset Forfeiture for Criminal Acts Bill has been under discussion\nfor more than a decade. In 2026, deliberations on the regulation have\nbeen pushed forward again, with the House of Representatives (DPR)\ntargeting its completion no later than December 2026.<\/p>\n<p>So, why is the Asset Forfeiture Bill considered important for\neradicating corruption?<\/p>\n<p>Restoring state losses<\/p>\n<p>One of the main reasons this bill is considered important is to\nstrengthen the recovery of assets derived from criminal acts. In\ncorruption cases, punishing the perpetrator does not automatically\nrestore all the losses suffered by the state.<\/p>\n<p>The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) recorded asset recoveries\nthroughout 2025 at Rp1.53 trillion. That figure increased compared with\nthe 2024 achievement of Rp739.6 billion.<\/p>\n<p>At the level of law enforcement as a whole, the government also\nrecorded asset recoveries from corruption cases handled by the Attorney\nGeneral\u2019s Office, the KPK and the National Police (Polri) reaching\nRp28.6 trillion throughout 2025.<\/p>\n<p>The magnitude of these figures shows that asset recovery is an\nimportant part of eradicating corruption, because the end result is not\nonly punishment for perpetrators, but also the return of wealth linked\nto criminal acts.<\/p>\n<p>Corruption is fundamentally aimed at obtaining unlawful gains.\nTherefore, law enforcement is not sufficient merely to ensure that\nperpetrators are punished; it must also pursue assets suspected of\noriginating from criminal acts.<\/p>\n<p>Studies on the Asset Forfeiture Bill assess that the regulation can\nstrengthen the asset recovery approach, so that combating corruption is\noriented not only towards prosecuting offenders, but also towards\nrestoring state losses.<\/p>\n<p>With this approach, the proceeds of crime become a key focus in the\nlaw enforcement process.<\/p>\n<p>Filling gaps in existing regulations<\/p>\n<p>At present, Indonesia actually already has a number of provisions on\nthe seizure and forfeiture of assets through various regulations,\nincluding the Corruption Eradication Law and the Money Laundering\nLaw.<\/p>\n<p>However, several studies consider there to still be gaps in the\nexisting legal framework, particularly regarding asset forfeiture\nmechanisms that do not depend entirely on criminal convictions of\nperpetrators.<\/p>\n<p>The Asset Forfeiture Bill is expected to provide a more comprehensive\nlegal basis for how the state can pursue and manage assets linked to\ncriminal acts.<\/p>\n<p>Understanding non-conviction based forfeiture<\/p>\n<p>One aspect that has drawn considerable attention to the Asset\nForfeiture Bill is the concept of non-conviction based forfeiture, or\nthe forfeiture of assets without first waiting for a criminal conviction\nagainst an individual in certain circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>This concept differs from the conviction-based forfeiture mechanism,\nwhich essentially ties forfeiture to criminal proceedings and\nverdicts.<\/p>\n<p>Implementing such a mechanism requires very clear rules so that it\ndoes not become a tool for arbitrarily seizing someone\u2019s property. For\nthis reason, the protection of the rights of third parties acting in\ngood faith, judicial process, evidentiary standards and oversight remain\nessential parts of drafting the regulation. Studies on the\nimplementation of asset recovery in Indonesia have also highlighted the\nneed for regulatory harmonisation, institutional strengthening and\nprotection of third parties.<\/p>\n<p>Efforts to strengthen the return of criminal proceeds also align with\nIndonesia\u2019s commitment to the United Nations Convention Against\nCorruption (UNCAC).<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia ratified the UNCAC through Law Number 7 of 2006. The\nConvention places asset recovery as an important part of international\ncooperation in combating corruption.<\/p>\n<p>This has become increasingly important because the proceeds of\ncorruption can be moved, hidden or placed in particular forms of assets,\nso that recovering them requires adequate legal instruments.<\/p>\n<p>The bill is expedited again in 2026<\/p>\n<p>After years on the legislative agenda, deliberation of the Asset\nForfeiture Bill has been expedited again in 2026. Commission III of the\nDPR stated that discussions are ongoing and targeted completion of the\nregulation by the end of 2026.<\/p>\n<p>The bill\u2019s journey is not new. The idea of drafting asset forfeiture\nregulations first emerged in 2008 and later returned as part of the\ngovernment\u2019s anti-corruption agenda.<\/p>\n<p>Pressure to pass the bill has also come from civil society groups,\nwho consider the regulation necessary to strengthen efforts to pursue\ncriminal proceeds.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, deliberation of the bill still needs to be\nconducted openly and carefully. A number of anti-corruption groups have\nhighlighted the importance of transparency in the draft and public\nparticipation in the drafting process.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the urgency of the Asset Forfeiture Bill is not merely about\nseizing the wealth of corrupt actors. The regulation is expected to\nstrengthen the asset recovery system, narrow the space for perpetrators\nto hide their criminal proceeds, and ensure that state losses can be\nrecovered as fully as possible.<\/p>\n<p>However, its future effectiveness will still depend on the substance\nof the regulation, evidentiary mechanisms, the professionalism of law\nenforcement officials, oversight, and guarantees of protection for\ncitizens\u2019 rights. With that balance, corruption can be combated without\nabandoning the principles of the rule of law.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/asset-forfeiture-bill-why-is-it-important-for-fighting-corruption-1789455352",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}