{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1325313,
        "msgid": "asias-top-security-grouping-reaches-critical-juncture-analysts-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-06-14 00:00:00",
        "title": "Asia's top security grouping reaches critical juncture: analysts",
        "author": null,
        "source": "AFP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Asia's top security grouping reaches critical juncture: analysts Samantha Brown, Agence France-Presse, Bangkok Asia's top security grouping, formed a decade ago with a mandate to help maintain regional peace and stability, has reached a crossroads, say analysts who are divided over assessing its progress.",
        "content": "<p>Asia's top security grouping reaches critical juncture: analysts<\/p>\n<p>Samantha Brown, Agence France-Presse, Bangkok<\/p>\n<p>Asia's top security grouping, formed a decade ago with a mandate<br>\nto help maintain regional peace and stability, has reached a<br>\ncrossroads, say analysts who are divided over assessing its<br>\nprogress.<\/p>\n<p>The ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) meets for the 10th time next<br>\nweek in Phnom Penh, bringing together foreign ministers from the<br>\nAssociation of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its security<br>\ndialog partners including the United States, China and the<br>\nEuropean Union (EU).<\/p>\n<p>A medley of trying international issues pepper the forum's<br>\nagenda this year, including terrorism, Iraq and North Korea's<br>\nnuclear ambitions and the recent democracy crackdown in Myanmar.<\/p>\n<p>Hopes have already been dashed on one front. North Korea's<br>\nforeign minister Paek Nam-sun pulled out after current ARF chair<br>\nCambodia issued a draft for the meet that included a discussion<br>\nof tensions on the Korean peninsula.<\/p>\n<p>The abrupt cancellation illustrates the difficulties faced by<br>\nthe ARF in bringing key issues to the table, analysts say.<\/p>\n<p>\"It's very bad. It's a big loss. The ARF is being used as a<br>\ntool by one country to manipulate other countries. Instead of<br>\nsolving the problem, it is becoming part of the problem,\" said<br>\nPanitan Wattanayakorn, an academic from Chulalongkorn University.<\/p>\n<p>\"What else would you like to talk about in this region?<br>\nThere's terrorism and North Korea... and they can't talk, let<br>\nalone talk about those issues.\"<\/p>\n<p>Prapat Thepchatree, director of the Thammasat University's<br>\nCenter for International Policy Studies, said the forum has moved<br>\ntoo slowly since its 1994 inception.<\/p>\n<p>Back then its creators envisioned members working on<br>\nconfidence-building measures before shifting toward preventive<br>\ndiplomacy and then setting up a conflict resolution mechanism.<\/p>\n<p>\"Right now we are still struggling to move from stage one to<br>\ntwo. After almost 10 years of existence it's still gradually<br>\nmoving, and most of the time is spent dealing with the so-called<br>\nconfidence-building measures,\" he told AFP.<\/p>\n<p>\"It's at a standstill and in some sense it's going backwards.\"<\/p>\n<p>Others however are more sanguine and argue that expectations<br>\nfor the forum should not be too high.<\/p>\n<p>\"It's still consolidating. It will take another five years<br>\nmaybe for ARF members to feel confident enough to discuss<br>\nissues,\" said Kavi Chongkittavorn, group editor of the English-<br>\nlanguage Nation newspaper.<\/p>\n<p>\"They have spent 10 years building up comfort levels... They<br>\nhave built up this rapport. In that sense, there's not much in<br>\nterms of concrete outcomes -- but I think it is still relevant,\"<br>\nhe said.<\/p>\n<p>\"It is relevant simply because it is the only regional<br>\nsecurity forum for Asian countries with the participation of key<br>\nmajor powers.\"<\/p>\n<p>ARF is widely recognized as the top such grouping in the<br>\nregion, but it may face a competitor: the two-year old Asian<br>\nSecurity Conference.<\/p>\n<p>The annual gathering, the brainchild of the London-based<br>\nInternational Institute for Strategic Studies, brings defense<br>\nrather than foreign ministers together. It last met in Singapore<br>\nin May.<\/p>\n<p>\"They are working more closely than in the ARF and have agreed<br>\nnot to bring itself under the ARF umbrella,\" Chulalongkorn's<br>\nPanitan said.<\/p>\n<p>\"It could give the ARF a challenge in the longer term. Defense<br>\nministers are more relaxed and they have more power on security<br>\nissues.\"<\/p>\n<p>The academic added that he believed the ARF progressed<br>\nsufficiently in its first five years but its development has<br>\nsince slowed to a critical point.<\/p>\n<p>\"It's at a very important juncture at which it could become an<br>\neffective institution. They have to make a strategic move to<br>\nfocus on what is important to them and move way from confidence-<br>\nbuilding measures to something much more meaningful. At the end<br>\nof its first decade, the ARF has a second chance.\"<\/p>\n<p>ASEAN groups together Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos,<br>\nMalaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and<br>\nVietnam.<\/p>\n<p>Other ARF members are Australia, Canada, China, the European<br>\nUnion, India, Japan, Mongolia, New Zealand, North Korea, South<br>\nKorea, Papua New Guinea, Russia and the United States.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/asias-top-security-grouping-reaches-critical-juncture-analysts-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}