{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1306152,
        "msgid": "aseans-future-is-at-stake-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-08-10 00:00:00",
        "title": "ASEAN's future is at stake",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "ASEAN's future is at stake By Jusuf Wanandi JAKARTA (JP): At the same time that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) foreign ministers met at the end of last month in Bangkok, 10 experts from the original five members had a two-day meeting to discuss its long term future. What follows are some of the thoughts expressed during the discussions.",
        "content": "<p>ASEAN's future is at stake<\/p>\n<p>By Jusuf Wanandi<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): At the same time that the Association of<br>\nSoutheast Asian Nations (ASEAN) foreign ministers met at the end<br>\nof last month in Bangkok, 10 experts from the original five<br>\nmembers had a two-day meeting to discuss its long term future.<br>\nWhat follows are some of the thoughts expressed during the<br>\ndiscussions.<\/p>\n<p>ASEAN was created 33 years ago to jointly deal with the<br>\nuncertain aftermath of the Vietnam War and to provide a forum for<br>\ninter-regional cooperation and the prevention of possible inter-<br>\nregional conflicts in the future.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, ASEAN has been a state-to-state cooperation par<br>\nexcellence, with no intentions to achieve integration and become<br>\na community. That is also why the principle of non-intervention<br>\nhas been sacrosanct and explains why foreign ministers have a<br>\ndominant role in ASEAN.<\/p>\n<p>While the stated purpose of the Association is to promote<br>\neconomic and social cooperation, for many years ASEAN did not<br>\ndevelop any of those ideas. Instead, diplomacy was supreme. It<br>\nwas very much a top down exercise and the public had only a<br>\nmarginal role.<\/p>\n<p>In a sense, ASEAN has achieved the basic objectives of its<br>\ncreation. There have been no major conflicts among ASEAN members,<br>\nand since the Vietnam War, stability and peace have reigned. This<br>\nwas partly due to ASEAN's efforts to prevent the often predicted<br>\nBalkanization of Southeast Asia. Indeed, this is no small<br>\nachievement!<\/p>\n<p>But what about the future? In the last 30 years there have<br>\nbeen a lot of changes. There have been significant internal<br>\nchanges within the countries and external global and regional<br>\nchanges, particularly in the last decade, have created extreme<br>\nand dramatic pressures for ASEAN as a whole and for each of its<br>\nmembers.<\/p>\n<p>The greatest impact on ASEAN has been the pressures resulting<br>\nfrom globalization. Its influence is all encompassing as the<br>\nfinancial crisis in East Asia has shown since 1997 and members<br>\ncannot adjust to these external pressures by themselves. Even<br>\ndeveloped nations cannot cope with the changes on their own. That<br>\nmay also be the reason why European Union members are expanding<br>\ntheir cooperation.<\/p>\n<p>The second global event affecting ASEAN was the end of the<br>\ncold war. That has altered the security and stability of the<br>\nregion and has opened new horizons in strategic developments. It<br>\nalso has put pressure on existing mechanisms and institutions to<br>\nadjust and to change or risk the possibility of perishing.<\/p>\n<p>Thus the big question is whether ASEAN can adjust and change<br>\nin the medium term and cope with those dramatic changes.<\/p>\n<p>It will not be easy and it seems almost impossible for ASEAN<br>\nto change so fundamentally given the constraints that it is now<br>\nfacing. Because of the financial crisis ASEAN members tend to be<br>\ninward looking. In addition, because of leadership changes in<br>\nsome of the old members, personal relations are no longer so<br>\ncritical for ASEAN cooperation as in the past. New members have<br>\nbrought difficulties of all sorts because of a difference in<br>\nexperiences, political systems and economic developments.<\/p>\n<p>Basically the old principles on which ASEAN has functioned for<br>\nthe last 30 years, namely a personal, non-legalistic and informal<br>\nsystem of cooperation between the states or their bureaucracies<br>\nare no longer adequate to cope with fundamental changes in ASEAN<br>\nand in each of its member countries.<\/p>\n<p>Domestic problems such as the financial crisis, drug-<br>\ntrafficking, environmental hazards, migration problems,<br>\ntransnational crimes (e.g. piracy etc.) are also regional<br>\nproblems. They call for regional and in some instances even<br>\nglobal cooperation. The new challenges no longer recognize the<br>\ndivide between domestic and external aspects. Therefore, ASEAN as<br>\na regional entity could be even more relevant if it could get its<br>\nact together and change in a fundamental way.<\/p>\n<p>To achieve that would require ASEAN members to have a common<br>\nvision of the future. ASEAN heads agreed on the ASEAN Vision 2020<br>\nalmost three years ago in Hanoi. However, ASEAN members also need<br>\nto develop new principles of cooperation.<\/p>\n<p>Based on those principles, rules have to be established to<br>\nguide the organization and to make the cooperation viable. Those<br>\nrules have to take into consideration that the many problems<br>\nASEAN is facing can not be solved individually.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the principle of \"non-intervention\" is passe. As a<br>\nlast resort, \"intervention\" could be done in a more acceptable<br>\nway. Examples where beneficial intervention might have worked in<br>\npast experiences in ASEAN are surveillance of macro-economic<br>\nindicators, the haze problem, and some policies on migration,<br>\ndrug-trafficking and transnational crime.<\/p>\n<p>For the implementation of the rules, institutions have to be<br>\nestablished. The heads should meet annually and empower this<br>\nmeeting as the highest decision making body. A council of<br>\nministers also has to be formed with the task of deciding on<br>\nprograms and directives. The dominant role of the foreign<br>\nminister in ASEAN is no longer relevant. ASEAN problems have<br>\nbecome all encompassing and complex, and other ministers have to<br>\nget involved in working out answers.<\/p>\n<p>The office of the Secretariat General has to be strengthened<br>\nand prepared for all the decisions that the council of ministers<br>\nand heads of ASEAN have to make. The workload of the existing<br>\nrotating Senior Officials Meetings has to be replaced by the<br>\nSecretariat with very few exceptions.<\/p>\n<p>Last but not least the public, think-tanks, non-government<br>\norganizations and society at large who have a stake in the<br>\ncooperation should have their say and should be allowed in some<br>\ninstances to take the initiatives towards ASEAN functional<br>\ncooperation.<\/p>\n<p>Can these changes be implemented? Many wise men and visionary<br>\ngroups have proposed modest institutional changes and failed. But<br>\nthe future will be different, and the challenges are huge and<br>\ncomplex. If ASEAN fails to change, then ASEAN will become<br>\nirrelevant to its members and will wither away.<\/p>\n<p>Those changes could be implemented over a medium term. In the<br>\nmeantime two priorities have to be accepted.  First is the total<br>\nengagement of the older members with the new members of ASEAN<br>\nthat will also involve providing development assistance by the<br>\nold members to the new ones. This could be done in a triangular<br>\nway with financial assistance from international\/financial<br>\ninstitutions or from Japan. Only then can the new members<br>\nparticipate fully in ASEAN's programs. This is critically<br>\nimportant if ASEAN would like to stay united.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the principle of the \"coalition of the willing\" or the<br>\ndecision of ASEAN minus X should be introduced. As such, some<br>\nmembers can develop a program without the participation of others<br>\nat the beginning. But it should be open to them whenever they are<br>\nready to participate.<\/p>\n<p>To be able to get those changes moving, the civil societies in<br>\nASEAN have to participate fully in the effort and should pressure<br>\ntheir governments by arousing public opinion and initiate<br>\nprograms in respective countries. At the functional and<br>\nprofessional levels there is ample cooperation going on among<br>\nASEAN societies.<\/p>\n<p>Hopefully the ASEAN People's Assembly (APA) to be held for the<br>\nfirst time in November in Batam, in conjunction with the Informal<br>\nSummit in Singapore, could push for these changes that are of<br>\nvital importance for ASEAN's survival. APA is initiated by ASEAN<br>\nand the Institute of Strategic and International Studies, an<br>\nASEAN non-governmental organization. The Assembly is expected to<br>\nbring together over 300 NGO and civil society representatives as<br>\nwell as governments.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Centre<br>\nfor Strategic and International Studies, Jakarta.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/aseans-future-is-at-stake-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}