{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1312285,
        "msgid": "analysts-criticize-gus-durs-stance-on-interpellation-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-07-21 00:00:00",
        "title": "Analysts criticize Gus Dur's stance on interpellation",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Analysts criticize Gus Dur's stance on interpellation JAKARTA (JP): Political observers slammed President Abdurrahman Wahid's performance at Thursday's interpellation at the House of Representatives, saying he missed a golden opportunity to boost his public image and reconcile his political differences with the legislature.",
        "content": "<p>Analysts criticize Gus Dur&apos;s stance on interpellation<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): Political observers slammed President<br>\nAbdurrahman Wahid&apos;s performance at Thursday&apos;s interpellation at<br>\nthe House of Representatives, saying he missed a golden<br>\nopportunity to boost his public image and reconcile his political<br>\ndifferences with the legislature.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesian Institute of Sciences political analyst Ikrar Nusa<br>\nBakti said that instead of clearing things up, the President&apos;s<br>\nanswers only prolonged the &quot;dispute&quot; between himself and the<br>\nHouse.<\/p>\n<p>Ikrar asserted that Abdurrahman seemed to miss a very simple<br>\npoint raised by the House, which was to prove whether he was<br>\nlying when he said he dismissed two economic ministers because of<br>\ncorruption.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of answering questions about the dismissals,<br>\nAbdurrahman instead launched an attack against the House and said<br>\nthe interpellation was unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Although it is true that there are different views about the<br>\nlegality of the interpellation motion, it is the Supreme Court<br>\nwhich has the right of judicial review and to compare the law<br>\nwith the 1945 Constitution, not the President,&quot; he remarked.<\/p>\n<p>Ikrar lamented that the outcome of Thursday&apos;s proceedings<br>\nwould only create an &quot;unhealthy&quot; domestic atmosphere. He asserted<br>\nthat Abdurrahman should have made better use of this opportunity.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, an observer from the Centre for Strategic and<br>\nInternational Studies, J. Kristiadi, said Abdurrahman should have<br>\nused the momentum to tone down the differences of opinion between<br>\nhimself and the House.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Gus Dur should have used the opportunity to win back the<br>\npublic&apos;s heart, and somehow apologize for his possible misconduct<br>\nin dismissing the two ministers,&quot; Kristiadi said, referring to<br>\nAbdurrahman by his nickname.<\/p>\n<p>He said the likely outcome of Thursday&apos;s events was that the<br>\npublic would perceive the President&apos;s actions as a move to muffle<br>\nlegislators who were asserting their rights.<\/p>\n<p>In Yogyakarta, Gadjah Mada University political observer<br>\nRiswandha Imawan said Abdurrahman simply chose not to reply to<br>\nthe House&apos;s questions.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;And, as usual, he even created a new problem by questioning<br>\nthe House&apos;s constitutional right on the interpellation motion. It<br>\nwould be much easier if he said &apos;I&apos;m sorry,&apos;&quot; Riswandha said.<\/p>\n<p>Political observer Nana Sutikna of Jendral Soedirman<br>\nUniversity in Purwokerto concurred. &quot;This is Gus Dur&apos;s habit. He<br>\nseems to feel he is the only one that can do no wrong ... just<br>\nlike Soeharto, who never wanted to apologize for what he did.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Gadjah Mada University rector Ichlasul Amal also slammed<br>\nAbdurrahman for not being honest and straightforward in revealing<br>\nthe reasons behind the dismissals of ministers Laksamana Sukardi<br>\nand Jusuf Kalla in April.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;This is not the era of political secrecy. His political<br>\ninfluence and popularity will drop.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Abdurrahman&apos;s reasoning for not disclosing everything was<br>\npolitically weak, as there is no clear classification of what may<br>\nbe called a &apos;state secret,&apos;&quot; Ichlasul said.<\/p>\n<p>In Bandung, constitutional law expert Bagir Manan of<br>\nPadjadjaran University said Abdurrahman&apos;s move to question the<br>\nconstitutional validity of interpellation was irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;A country is not only ruled by its constitution, but also its<br>\nlaws and regulations,&quot; Bagir said.<\/p>\n<p>University of Indonesia political scientist Arbi Sanit was one<br>\nof the few who saw a silver lining in the whole affair. He<br>\nclaimed the President&apos;s responses were strategic answers that<br>\nwould improve the image of the House and the President.<\/p>\n<p>He said that throughout the interpellation, the rupiah<br>\nstrengthened and the market reacted positively. &quot;It was the most<br>\nstrategic move for himself, while at the same time it did not<br>\nundermine the House, did not ruin its public image and increased<br>\nthe value of rupiah.&quot; (25\/44\/45\/swa\/edt\/jun\/dja\/)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/analysts-criticize-gus-durs-stance-on-interpellation-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}