{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1110435,
        "msgid": "an-alternative-idea-for-change-1447893297",
        "date": "2001-08-23 00:00:00",
        "title": "An alternative idea for change",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "An alternative idea for change It has been a common phenomenon in developing countries -- notably those which have been ruled by heartless tyrants -- to experience a constitutional crisis. But for Indonesia, which has had its own democratic system for 46 years, the reality is more a case of tragic irony. It is an inarguable fact that every time a dictator seized power, they claimed to be a true champion of democracy.",
        "content": "<p>An alternative idea for change<\/p>\n<p>It has been a common phenomenon in developing countries --<br>\nnotably those which have been ruled by heartless tyrants -- to<br>\nexperience a constitutional crisis. But for Indonesia, which has<br>\nhad its own democratic system for 46 years, the reality is more a<br>\ncase of tragic irony.<\/p>\n<p>It is an inarguable fact that every time a dictator seized<br>\npower, they claimed to be a true champion of democracy. Sukarno<br>\nintroduced \"Guided Democracy\", and Soeharto, a less-educated,<br>\nmilitary schooled and ruthless despot, called his system<br>\n\"Pancasila Democracy\".<\/p>\n<p>The two terms are actually euphemisms for the same system:<br>\ndictatorship. Soeharto claimed that he was the sole interpreter<br>\nof the Constitution and, during his three decades of rule, did<br>\nnot hesitate in crushing any party or individual harboring<br>\naspirations to amend the \"sacred document\".<\/p>\n<p>However, one thing is clear: by abusing the Constitution both<br>\ndictators managed to extend the duration and scope of their<br>\nexclusive rule, despite the document originally being intended<br>\nfor only temporary use.<\/p>\n<p>The constitution does, however, open the door for amendments<br>\nthrough the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR). And after<br>\nacknowledging the boisterous calls for constitutional amendment<br>\nemerging after Soeharto's political demise in 1998, the MPR set<br>\nup an Ad Hoc Committee in charge of the constitutional<br>\namendments.<\/p>\n<p>But while the Committee is still working, many people are<br>\npessimistic that it will produce a new and modern constitution<br>\nbecause the MPR, which is supposed to have the last say, lacks<br>\nthe people's trust. Many people do not fully trust the lawmakers<br>\nbecause of their lack of integrity and ubiquitous self-serving<br>\ninfluence.<\/p>\n<p>And the public are very much aware that the legislative group<br>\nmost supportive of the status quo is the Indonesian Democratic<br>\nParty of Struggle (PDI Perjuangan), which has the largest number<br>\nof representatives among the multitude of political parties that<br>\nemerged during the 1999 general election.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, to draft the new constitution, this country needs a<br>\nnew independent body whose membership consists of provincial<br>\nrepresentatives and constitutional law experts. The sponsors of<br>\nthis new voice is a group of non-governmental organizations<br>\n(NGOs).<\/p>\n<p>President Megawati Soekarnoputri, in her recent state-of-the<br>\n-nation address, also endorsed the idea to set up a special<br>\ncommission for that purpose. However, without going into detail<br>\nabout the commission, the President suggested that important<br>\nvalues from the old 1945 Constitution, which are included in its<br>\nPreamble, should be included in the new document.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, all reasonable ideas from the 1945 Constitution and<br>\nthe new ones put forward by the new commission -- or whatever its<br>\nname is -- should be important elements of a new constitution.<br>\nFurthermore, the draft should be written with such transparency<br>\nthat no party ever has an opportunity to abuse it.<\/p>\n<p>The NGOs have pointed to Thailand, which, in its effort to<br>\nheal the wounds left by repeated military dictatorships, has<br>\nachieved outstanding success in this area.<\/p>\n<p>The country's new constitution was drafted by people's<br>\nrepresentatives from each province, who worked together with<br>\nconstitutional law experts. The final product was later submitted<br>\nto the parliament, which had no authority to modify it. It could<br>\nonly accept or reject the draft. The new Thai constitution is the<br>\nproduct of this procedure and it has successfully fostered<br>\npolitical stability.<\/p>\n<p>Appraisal of Thailand's experience indicates that the system<br>\nis worthy of being implemented here. Possible challenges would<br>\ninclude the selection of commission members to represent all<br>\nprovinces, and the organization of a referendum should the MPR<br>\nreject the new draft. Last but not least, an enormous challenge<br>\nwould be working out how to make the MPR accept this new idea.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/an-alternative-idea-for-change-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}