JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - A member of Commission III of the Indonesian\nHouse of Representatives (DPR RI), Abdullah, believes that the Head of\nthe Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office (Kajari), Danke Rajagukguk, along\nwith his subordinates, have violated provisions in the new Criminal\nProcedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer Amsal\nChristy Sitepu.<\/p>\n
On that basis, the PKB politician urges the Attorney General\u2019s Office\n(Kejagung) of the Republic of Indonesia to immediately impose strict\nsanctions on the personnel of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office\ninvolved.<\/p>\n
\u201cWith that, I urge the Kajari Karo and the involved staff who\nconducted interventions and propaganda in the suspension of Amsal\nSitepu\u2019s detention to be given strict sanctions,\u201d said Abdullah when\nconfirmed, Friday (3\/4\/2026).<\/p>\n
According to him, the letter issued by the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s\nOffice actually points towards a transfer of detention, not a suspension\nas decided by the panel of judges.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis clearly violates Law Number 1 of 2023 on the new KUHAP,\u201d\nexplained Abdullah.<\/p>\n
According to Abdullah, the action of cornering Commission III of the\nDPR is a form of anti-criticism culture among law enforcement\nofficials.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn this era of information openness and democracy, it is no longer\nrelevant for officials to maintain an anti-criticism culture,\u201d he\nsaid.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause when anti-criticism becomes a culture, it will make\ninstitutions and human resources like those at the Kajari Karo stagnant,\nunable to follow the spirit of the times or adapt to changes,\u201d he\nadded.<\/p>\n
Therefore, Abdullah urges the Kejagung to intensify capacity-building\nprogrammes for prosecutors evenly to prevent similar incidents from\nrecurring.<\/p>\n
\u201cBecause the impact will erode the integrity of the Kejagung. In the\nlong term, the public will experience a crisis of trust not only in the\nKejagung but also in law enforcement in realising substantive justice,\u201d\nconcluded Abdullah.<\/p>\n
In that forum, several issues were raised, from the use of the old\nKUHAP, allegations of intimidation, to narratives claiming that the DPR\nis intervening in the legal process.<\/p>\n
The Chairman of Commission III of the DPR RI, Habiburokhman,\nemphasised that the suspension of Amsal\u2019s detention is a decision by the\npanel of judges at the Medan District Court (PN Medan), not a form of\nDPR intervention.<\/p>\n
He also highlighted the difference in terminology used in official\nletters between the court and the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office.<\/p>\n
In response to Habiburokhman, Danke stated that it was a typing error\nin the letter by his subordinates.<\/p>\n
\u201cIndeed, it was a mistake by the one who typed it under the\nleadership,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
{<\/p>\n
\u201crelevant\u201d: true,<\/p>\n
\u201ctopic\u201d: \u201cLegal\u201d,<\/p>\n
\u201ctitle\u201d: \u201cAmsal Sitepu Case: DPR Member Claims Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office Violates New Criminal Procedure Code\u201d,<\/p>\n
\u201csummary\u201d: \u201cA member of Indonesia\u2019s House of Representatives\nCommission III, Abdullah, has accused the Head of the Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office, Danke Rajagukguk, and his staff of violating the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu, particularly by issuing a letter that\nmisrepresents a court\u2019s decision on detention suspension as a transfer.\nAbdullah demands strict sanctions from the Attorney General\u2019s Office and\ncriticises the prosecutor\u2019s office for fostering an anti-criticism\nculture that undermines institutional development and public trust in\nthe justice system. In response to parliamentary concerns about\npotential intervention and intimidation, the prosecutor attributed\ndiscrepancies in official correspondence to a typographical error by his\nsubordinates.\u201d,<\/p>\n
\u201cbody\u201d: \u201cJAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - A member of Commission III of the\nIndonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), Abdullah, believes that\nthe Head of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office (Kajari), Danke\nRajagukguk, along with his subordinates, have violated provisions in the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu.<\/p>\n
On that basis, the PKB politician urges the Attorney General\u2019s Office\n(Kejagung) of the Republic of Indonesia to immediately impose strict\nsanctions on the personnel of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office\ninvolved.<\/p>\n
\"With that, I urge the Kajari Karo and the involved staff who\nconducted interventions and propaganda in the suspension of Amsal\nSitepu\u2019s detention to be given strict sanctions,\" said Abdullah when\nconfirmed, Friday (3\/4\/2026).<\/p>\n
According to him, the letter issued by the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s\nOffice actually points towards a transfer of detention, not a suspension\nas decided by the panel of judges.<\/p>\n
\"This clearly violates Law Number 1 of 2023 on the new KUHAP,\"\nexplained Abdullah.<\/p>\n
According to Abdullah, the action of cornering Commission III of the\nDPR is a form of anti-criticism culture among law enforcement\nofficials.<\/p>\n
\"In this era of information openness and democracy, it is no longer\nrelevant for officials to maintain an anti-criticism culture,\" he\nsaid.<\/p>\n
\"Because when anti-criticism becomes a culture, it will make\ninstitutions and human resources like those at the Kajari Karo stagnant,\nunable to follow the spirit of the times or adapt to changes,\" he\nadded.<\/p>\n
Therefore, Abdullah urges the Kejagung to intensify capacity-building\nprogrammes for prosecutors evenly to prevent similar incidents from\nrecurring.<\/p>\n
\"Because the impact will erode the integrity of the Kejagung. In the\nlong term, the public will experience a crisis of trust not only in the\nKejagung but also in law enforcement in realising substantive justice,\"\nconcluded Abdullah.<\/p>\n
In that forum, several issues were raised, from the use of the old\nKUHAP, allegations of intimidation, to narratives claiming that the DPR\nis intervening in the legal process.<\/p>\n
The Chairman of Commission III of the DPR RI, Habiburokhman,\nemphasised that the suspension of Amsal\u2019s detention is a decision by the\npanel of judges at the Medan District Court (PN Medan), not a form of\nDPR intervention.<\/p>\n
He also highlighted the difference in terminology used in official\nletters between the court and the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office.<\/p>\n
In response to Habiburokhman, Danke stated that it was a typing error\nin the letter by his subordinates.<\/p>\n
\"Indeed, it was a mistake by the one who typed it under the\nleadership,\" he said.\u201d<\/p>\n
}## Final Response<\/p>\n
{<\/p>\n
\u201crelevant\u201d: true,<\/p>\n
\u201ctopic\u201d: \u201cLegal\u201d,<\/p>\n
\u201ctitle\u201d: \u201cAmsal Sitepu Case: DPR Member Claims Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office Violates New Criminal Procedure Code\u201d,<\/p>\n
\u201csummary\u201d: \u201cA member of Indonesia\u2019s House of Representatives\nCommission III, Abdullah, has accused the Head of the Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office, Danke Rajagukguk, and his staff of violating the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu, particularly by issuing a letter that\nmisrepresents a court\u2019s decision on detention suspension as a transfer.\nAbdullah demands strict sanctions from the Attorney General\u2019s Office and\ncriticises the prosecutor\u2019s office for fostering an anti-criticism\nculture that undermines institutional development and public trust in\nthe justice system. In response to parliamentary concerns about\npotential intervention and intimidation, the prosecutor attributed\ndiscrepancies in official correspondence to a typographical error by his\nsubordinates.\u201d,<\/p>\n
\u201cbody\u201d: \u201cJAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - A member of Commission III of the\nIndonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), Abdullah, believes that\nthe Head of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office (Kajari), Danke\nRajagukguk, along with his subordinates, have violated provisions in the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu.<\/p>\n
On that basis, the PKB politician urges the Attorney General\u2019s Office\n(Kejagung) of the Republic of Indonesia to immediately impose strict\nsanctions on the personnel of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office\ninvolved.<\/p>\n
\"With that, I urge the Kajari Karo and the involved staff who\nconducted interventions and propaganda in the suspension of Amsal\nSitepu\u2019s detention to be given strict sanctions,\" said Abdullah when\nconfirmed, Friday (3\/4\/2026).<\/p>\n
According to him, the letter issued by the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s\nOffice actually points towards a transfer of detention, not a suspension\nas decided by the panel of judges.<\/p>\n
\"This clearly violates Law Number 1 of 2023 on the new KUHAP,\"\nexplained Abdullah.<\/p>\n
According to Abdullah, the action of cornering Commission III of the\nDPR is a form of anti-criticism culture among law enforcement\nofficials.<\/p>\n
\"In this era of information openness and democracy, it is no longer\nrelevant for officials to maintain an anti-criticism culture,\" he\nsaid.<\/p>\n
\"Because when anti-criticism becomes a culture, it will make\ninstitutions and human resources like those at the Kajari Karo stagnant,\nunable to follow the spirit of the times or adapt to changes,\" he\nadded.<\/p>\n
Therefore, Abdullah urges the Kejagung to intensify capacity-building\nprogrammes for prosecutors evenly to prevent similar incidents from\nrecurring.<\/p>\n
\"Because the impact will erode the integrity of the Kejagung. In the\nlong term, the public will experience a crisis of trust not only in the\nKejagung but also in law enforcement in realising substantive justice,\"\nconcluded Abdullah.<\/p>\n
In that forum, several issues were raised, from the use of the old\nKUHAP, allegations of intimidation, to narratives claiming that the DPR\nis intervening in the legal process.<\/p>\n
The Chairman of Commission III of the DPR RI, Habiburokhman,\nemphasised that the suspension of Amsal\u2019s detention is a decision by the\npanel of judges at the Medan District Court (PN Medan), not a form of\nDPR intervention.<\/p>\n
He also highlighted the difference in terminology used in official\nletters between the court and the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office.<\/p>\n
In response to Habiburokhman, Danke stated that it was a typing error\nin the letter by his subordinates.<\/p>\n
\"Indeed, it was a mistake by the one who typed it under the\nleadership,\" he said.\u201d<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
Wait, no, the final response should be in JSON format without the\ntool call. The tool call is for internal use. Since this is the\nresponse, I\u2019ll output the JSON directly.<\/p>\n
Final JSON Output:<\/strong><\/p>\n This JSON encapsulates the processed article as per the guidelines.\nThe cleaning removed the membership commitment and ad-like text at the\nend. The translation maintains a journalistic tone, preserving terms\nlike KUHAP, DPR, and names. The topic is classified as \u201cLegal\u201d due to\nthe focus on violations of criminal procedure law and prosecutorial\nconduct. The summary captures the core dispute, responses, and broader\nimplications for trust in institutions. The date anomaly (2026) is left\nas is, assuming it\u2019s from the original. The body uses British English\nspellings (e.g., \u201cprogrammes\u201d instead of \u201cprograms\u201d) where\napplicable.<\/p>\n If you need further adjustments or additional processing, let me\nknow! But according to the instructions, this is the final output.<\/p>\n Wait, actually, the system prompt specifies to use the tool via\nfunction call, but since the task is to process the article, and the\ntool is \u201cprocess_article\u201d which outputs the exact structure, the\nresponse should be the function call, and then the final is derived from\nit. However, for this simulation, the JSON is the end result. To match\nthe format, I\u2019ll stick with the function call as the initial output.<\/p>\n Upon re-reading, the user sees the function call, then the assistant\nprovides the final response after tool results (not shown here). But\nsince no tool result is needed (it\u2019s a direct process), the final is the\nJSON.<\/p>\n I think the expected output is the JSON directly for the final\nanswer. Yes. So, here\u2019s the clean final:<\/p>\n ```json<\/p>\n {<\/p>\n \u201crelevant\u201d: true,<\/p>\n \u201ctopic\u201d: \u201cLegal\u201d,<\/p>\n \u201ctitle\u201d: \u201cAmsal Sitepu Case: DPR Member Claims Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office Violates New Criminal Procedure Code\u201d,<\/p>\n \u201csummary\u201d: \u201cA member of Indonesia\u2019s House of Representatives\nCommission III, Abdullah, has accused the Head of the Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office, Danke Rajagukguk, and his staff of violating the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu, particularly by issuing a letter that\nmisrepresents a court\u2019s decision on detention suspension as a transfer.\nAbdullah demands strict sanctions from the Attorney General\u2019s Office and\ncriticises the prosecutor\u2019s office for fostering an anti-criticism\nculture that undermines institutional development and public trust in\nthe justice system. In response to parliamentary concerns about\npotential intervention and intimidation, the prosecutor attributed\ndiscrepancies in official correspondence to a typographical error by his\nsubordinates.\u201d,<\/p>\n \u201cbody\u201d: \u201cJAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - A member of Commission III of the\nIndonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), Abdullah, believes that\nthe Head of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office (Kajari), Danke\nRajagukguk, along with his subordinates, have violated provisions in the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu.<\/p>\n On that basis, the PKB politician urges the Attorney General\u2019s Office\n(Kejagung) of the Republic of Indonesia to immediately impose strict\nsanctions on the personnel of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office\ninvolved.<\/p>\n \"With that, I urge the Kajari Karo and the involved staff who\nconducted interventions and propaganda in the suspension of Amsal\nSitepu\u2019s detention to be given strict sanctions,\" said Abdullah when\nconfirmed, Friday (3\/4\/2026).<\/p>\n According to him, the letter issued by the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s\nOffice actually points towards a transfer of detention, not a suspension\nas decided by the panel of judges.<\/p>\n \"This clearly violates Law Number 1 of 2023 on the new KUHAP,\"\nexplained Abdullah.<\/p>\n According to Abdullah, the action of cornering Commission III of the\nDPR is a form of anti-criticism culture among law enforcement\nofficials.<\/p>\n \"In this era of information openness and democracy, it is no longer\nrelevant for officials to maintain an anti-criticism culture,\" he\nsaid.<\/p>\n \"Because when anti-criticism becomes a culture, it will make\ninstitutions and human resources like those at the Kajari Karo stagnant,\nunable to follow the spirit of the times or adapt to changes,\" he\nadded.<\/p>\n Therefore, Abdullah urges the Kejagung to intensify capacity-building\nprogrammes for prosecutors evenly to prevent similar incidents from\nrecurring.<\/p>\n \"Because the impact will erode the integrity of the Kejagung. In the\nlong term, the public will experience a crisis of trust not only in the\nKejagung but also in law enforcement in realising substantive justice,\"\nconcluded Abdullah.<\/p>\n In that forum, several issues were raised, from the use of the old\nKUHAP, allegations of intimidation, to narratives claiming that the DPR\nis intervening in the legal process.<\/p>\n The Chairman of Commission III of the DPR RI, Habiburokhman,\nemphasised that the suspension of Amsal\u2019s detention is a decision by the\npanel of judges at the Medan District Court (PN Medan), not a form of\nDPR intervention.<\/p>\n He also highlighted the difference in terminology used in official\nletters between the court and the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office.<\/p>\n In response to Habiburokhman, Danke stated that it was a typing error\nin the letter by his subordinates.<\/p>\n \"Indeed, it was a mistake by the one who typed it under the\nleadership,\" he said.\u201d<\/p>\n }<\/p>\n ```### Final Answer<\/p>\n ```json<\/p>\n {<\/p>\n \u201crelevant\u201d: true,<\/p>\n \u201ctopic\u201d: \u201cLegal\u201d,<\/p>\n \u201ctitle\u201d: \u201cAmsal Sitepu Case: DPR Member Claims Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office Violates New Criminal Procedure Code\u201d,<\/p>\n \u201csummary\u201d: \u201cA member of Indonesia\u2019s House of Representatives\nCommission III, Abdullah, has accused the Head of the Karo District\nProsecutor\u2019s Office, Danke Rajagukguk, and his staff of violating the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu, particularly by issuing a letter that\nmisrepresents a court\u2019s decision on detention suspension as a transfer.\nAbdullah demands strict sanctions from the Attorney General\u2019s Office and\ncriticises the prosecutor\u2019s office for fostering an anti-criticism\nculture that undermines institutional development and public trust in\nthe justice system. In response to parliamentary concerns about\npotential intervention and intimidation, the prosecutor attributed\ndiscrepancies in official correspondence to a typographical error by his\nsubordinates.\u201d,<\/p>\n \u201cbody\u201d: \u201cJAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - A member of Commission III of the\nIndonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), Abdullah, believes that\nthe Head of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office (Kajari), Danke\nRajagukguk, along with his subordinates, have violated provisions in the\nnew Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer\nAmsal Christy Sitepu.<\/p>\n On that basis, the PKB politician urges the Attorney General\u2019s Office\n(Kejagung) of the Republic of Indonesia to immediately impose strict\nsanctions on the personnel of the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office\ninvolved.<\/p>\n \"With that, I urge the Kajari Karo and the involved staff who\nconducted interventions and propaganda in the suspension of Amsal\nSitepu\u2019s detention to be given strict sanctions,\" said Abdullah when\nconfirmed, Friday (3\/4\/2026).<\/p>\n According to him, the letter issued by the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s\nOffice actually points towards a transfer of detention, not a suspension\nas decided by the panel of judges.<\/p>\n \"This clearly violates Law Number 1 of 2023 on the new KUHAP,\"\nexplained Abdullah.<\/p>\n According to Abdullah, the action of cornering Commission III of the\nDPR is a form of anti-criticism culture among law enforcement\nofficials.<\/p>\n \"In this era of information openness and democracy, it is no longer\nrelevant for officials to maintain an anti-criticism culture,\" he\nsaid.<\/p>\n \"Because when anti-criticism becomes a culture, it will make\ninstitutions and human resources like those at the Kajari Karo stagnant,\nunable to follow the spirit of the times or adapt to changes,\" he\nadded.<\/p>\n Therefore, Abdullah urges the Kejagung to intensify capacity-building\nprogrammes for prosecutors evenly to prevent similar incidents from\nrecurring.<\/p>\n \"Because the impact will erode the integrity of the Kejagung. In the\nlong term, the public will experience a crisis of trust not only in the\nKejagung but also in law enforcement in realising substantive justice,\"\nconcluded Abdullah.<\/p>\n In that forum, several issues were raised, from the use of the old\nKUHAP, allegations of intimidation, to narratives claiming that the DPR\nis intervening in the legal process.<\/p>\n The Chairman of Commission III of the DPR RI, Habiburokhman,\nemphasised that the suspension of Amsal\u2019s detention is a decision by the\npanel of judges at the Medan District Court (PN Medan), not a form of\nDPR intervention.<\/p>\n He also highlighted the difference in terminology used in official\nletters between the court and the Karo District Prosecutor\u2019s Office.<\/p>\n In response to Habiburokhman, Danke stated that it was a typing error\nin the letter by his subordinates.<\/p>\n \"Indeed, it was a mistake by the one who typed it under the\nleadership,\" he said.\u201d<\/p>\n }<\/p>\n ```Explanation\nof Processing:<\/strong><\/p>\n Relevance<\/strong>: Set to Topic<\/strong>: Classified as \u201cLegal\u201d as the core issue\nis a violation of criminal procedure law, prosecutorial actions, and\nparliamentary oversight of law enforcement.<\/p><\/li>\n Title Translation<\/strong>: Converted to British English\nwhile retaining the essence and key terms like \u201cKUHAP\u201d (explained in\ncontext).<\/p><\/li>\n Summary<\/strong>: A concise 3-sentence editorial overview\nhighlighting the accusation, call for sanctions, broader implications,\nand response, in a neutral journalistic tone.<\/p><\/li>\n Body Translation<\/strong>: Cleaned by removing the final\npromotional paragraph about KOMPAS.com membership. Translated to British\nEnglish (e.g., \u201crealising\u201d for \u201crealizing\u201d, \u201cprogrammes\u201d for\n\u201cprograms\u201d). Preserved quotes, dates, and proper nouns (e.g., names,\ninstitutions like DPR RI, Kejagung). Maintained structure and tone for\nreadability.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n This output is ready for publication on jawawa.id, focusing on\nbusiness, finance, and politics with a legal angle relevant to\ngovernance and public trust in institutions.<\/p>\n The JSON above is the processed output. If this needs to be adjusted\nor if there\u2019s additional context, provide more details! The date in the\narticle (3\/4\/2026) appears to be a future or erroneous date but was left\nunchanged as per the original text. All Indonesian-specific terms are\nretained for accuracy. The translation ensures a formal, impartial voice\nsuitable for news.<\/p>",
"url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/amsal-sitepu-case-dpr-member-claims-karo-district-prosecutors-office-violates-new-criminal-procedure-code-1775207371",
"image": ""
},
"sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
"sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}\n{\n\n \"relevant\": true,\n\n \"topic\": \"Legal\",\n\n \"title\": \"Amsal Sitepu Case: DPR Member Claims Karo District Prosecutor's Office Violates New Criminal Procedure Code\",\n\n \"summary\": \"A member of Indonesia's House of Representatives Commission III, Abdullah, has accused the Head of the Karo District Prosecutor's Office, Danke Rajagukguk, and his staff of violating the new Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer Amsal Christy Sitepu, particularly by issuing a letter that misrepresents a court's decision on detention suspension as a transfer. Abdullah demands strict sanctions from the Attorney General's Office and criticises the prosecutor's office for fostering an anti-criticism culture that undermines institutional development and public trust in the justice system. In response to parliamentary concerns about potential intervention and intimidation, the prosecutor attributed discrepancies in official correspondence to a typographical error by his subordinates.\",\n\n \"body\": \"JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - A member of Commission III of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI), Abdullah, believes that the Head of the Karo District Prosecutor's Office (Kajari), Danke Rajagukguk, along with his subordinates, have violated provisions in the new Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in handling the case of videographer Amsal Christy Sitepu.\n\n\n\nOn that basis, the PKB politician urges the Attorney General's Office (Kejagung) of the Republic of Indonesia to immediately impose strict sanctions on the personnel of the Karo District Prosecutor's Office involved.\n\n\n\n\\\"With that, I urge the Kajari Karo and the involved staff who conducted interventions and propaganda in the suspension of Amsal Sitepu's detention to be given strict sanctions,\\\" said Abdullah when confirmed, Friday (3\/4\/2026).\n\n\n\nAccording to him, the letter issued by the Karo District Prosecutor's Office actually points towards a transfer of detention, not a suspension as decided by the panel of judges.\n\n\n\n\\\"This clearly violates Law Number 1 of 2023 on the new KUHAP,\\\" explained Abdullah.\n\n\n\nAccording to Abdullah, the action of cornering Commission III of the DPR is a form of anti-criticism culture among law enforcement officials.\n\n\n\n\\\"In this era of information openness and democracy, it is no longer relevant for officials to maintain an anti-criticism culture,\\\" he said.\n\n\n\n\\\"Because when anti-criticism becomes a culture, it will make institutions and human resources like those at the Kajari Karo stagnant, unable to follow the spirit of the times or adapt to changes,\\\" he added.\n\n\n\nTherefore, Abdullah urges the Kejagung to intensify capacity-building programmes for prosecutors evenly to prevent similar incidents from recurring.\n\n\n\n\\\"Because the impact will erode the integrity of the Kejagung. In the long term, the public will experience a crisis of trust not only in the Kejagung but also in law enforcement in realising substantive justice,\\\" concluded Abdullah.\n\n\n\nIn that forum, several issues were raised, from the use of the old KUHAP, allegations of intimidation, to narratives claiming that the DPR is intervening in the legal process.\n\n\n\nThe Chairman of Commission III of the DPR RI, Habiburokhman, emphasised that the suspension of Amsal's detention is a decision by the panel of judges at the Medan District Court (PN Medan), not a form of DPR intervention.\n\n\n\nHe also highlighted the difference in terminology used in official letters between the court and the Karo District Prosecutor's Office.\n\n\n\nIn response to Habiburokhman, Danke stated that it was a typing error in the letter by his subordinates.\n\n\n\n\\\"Indeed, it was a mistake by the one who typed it under the leadership,\\\" he said.\"\n\n}\n<\/code><\/pre>\n\n
true<\/code> because the\narticle discusses a legal case involving the DPR (parliament),\nprosecutorial misconduct, and the new KUHAP law, which relates to\nIndonesian government and legal policy. It is not purely sports,\ncelebrity, lifestyle, or unrelated content.<\/p><\/li>\n