Tech giants are suddenly united in calling for a slowdown in the\nadvancement of artificial intelligence (AI) to prioritise public safety.\nThis movement began with a lengthy essay by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei,\nwhich was subsequently supported by other tech elites, including\nOpenAI\u2019s Sam Altman and Elon Musk of xAI.<\/p>\n
Previously, former Anthropic AI researcher Jacob Coxon went viral on\nthe internet by claiming that the massive acceleration of AI could lead\nto human extinction within the next decade.<\/p>\n
Rising public concern regarding AI has also triggered a \u2018division\u2019\namong United States officials. Two political factions, traditionally\nknown to be at odds\u2014progressive Senator Bernie Sanders of the Democratic\nParty and Steve Bannon, a hardline ally of President Donald Trump\u2014have\nsurprisingly joined forces to demand that the government tighten\noversight of AI.<\/p>\n
However, this pressure has hit a thick wall within the corridors of\npower. US President Donald Trump has chosen to stand firm, taking a\nstance contrary to his critics.<\/p>\n
Trump Chooses to Accelerate AI Development<\/strong><\/p>\n Rather than tightening regulations, Trump has openly dismissed the\nconcerns of industry players and politicians regarding the potential\ndangers of AI. In public, his administration insists that the US already\npossesses adequate guardrails to tame such advanced technology without\nshackling innovation.<\/p>\n This White House stance has also received full support from the\nSpeaker of the US House of Representatives, Republican Mike Johnson.\nAccording to Johnson, implementing a moratorium or a delay in AI\ndevelopment would cause the US to lose its edge and surrender its\ncompetitive advantage to China.<\/p>\n Johnson went as far as to firmly delegate risk mitigation to the\ninternal market mechanisms of corporations. \u201cThey can regulate\nthemselves. They do not need the government to tell them to slow down.\nIf they want to slow down, they can,\u201d Johnson told reporters, as cited\nby Reuters.<\/p>\n A similar view was expressed by several other major tech industry\nleaders, including Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. The faction opposing the\nviews of Amodei and others argues that overly strict government\nregulation would instead kill the competitiveness of US companies on the\nglobal stage against their rivals from China.<\/p>\n Sanders and Bannon Demand Emergency Brake<\/strong><\/p>\n The opposition camp and various observers believe that the\n\u2018hands-off\u2019 approach adopted by Trump is extremely dangerous. In a forum\nin Washington, Bernie Sanders issued a stern warning that AI has the\npotential to eliminate tens of millions of jobs and destroy various\nprofessions in the near future.<\/p>\n Furthermore, Sanders highlighted shocking findings that AI has, for\nthe first time, been misused to design new viruses that pose a risk to\nglobal biosecurity.<\/p>\n \u201cThis technology will escape human control with consequences that\ncould potentially be catastrophic,\u201d said Sanders, who even urged Trump\nto immediately negotiate an AI suspension treaty with Chinese President\nXi Jinping.<\/p>\n A similar sentiment came from Steve Bannon. The former White House\nstrategist criticised Trump\u2019s reluctance to regulate the tech sector,\nwhich he believes is due to the strong grip of corporate lobbyists.\nBannon assessed that Congress is too slow in formulating legislation,\nprompting him to call for swift executive action to curb the pace of AI\nexpansion while completely cutting off the supply of US computer chips\nto China.<\/p>\n Government Alleges Election Politicisation<\/strong><\/p>\n Amidst this intensifying debate, the White House has flatly rejected\nthese concerns. US Attorney General Todd Blanche even accused the\nDemocratic Party of deliberately politicising the AI issue to garner\npolitical sentiment ahead of the Congressional midterm elections this\ncoming November.<\/p>\n While the fierce debate continues on Capitol Hill, tech giants are\nnow facing increasing public pressure. In addition to existential\nthreats, a wave of public opposition to mega-scale data centre projects,\nwhich consume vast amounts of public electricity, remains a significant\nobstacle to the industry\u2019s expansion ambitions.<\/p>",
"url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/america-divided-many-cry-danger-except-trump-1789567191",
"image": ""
},
"sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
"sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}