{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1307578,
        "msgid": "amendment-to-constitution-sparks-criticism-from-experts-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-08-04 00:00:00",
        "title": "Amendment to Constitution sparks criticism from experts",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Amendment to Constitution sparks criticism from experts JAKARTA (JP): A noted constitutional expert has criticized the ongoing amendments being made by the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) to the 1945 Constitution, saying the Assembly should form a new Constitution based on the current situation. Harun Alrasid, a professor of law at the University of Indonesia, maintained that the Assembly had few legal reasons and recommendations to amend the Constitution.",
        "content": "<p>Amendment to Constitution sparks criticism from experts<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): A noted constitutional expert has criticized the<br>\nongoing amendments being made by the People&apos;s Consultative<br>\nAssembly (MPR) to the 1945 Constitution, saying the Assembly<br>\nshould form a new Constitution based on the current situation.<\/p>\n<p>Harun Alrasid, a professor of law at the University of<br>\nIndonesia, maintained that the Assembly had few legal reasons and<br>\nrecommendations to amend the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>He further maintained that the task of the Assembly was &quot;to<br>\nmake&quot; constitutions.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Over the last 40 years, we have never had a new constitution<br>\nother than the 1945 Constitution, which was designed in<br>\naccordance with the political situation in 1945,&quot; he said on<br>\nThursday during a seminar on constitutional reform at the Centre<br>\nfor Strategic and International Studies.<\/p>\n<p>Harun said the present Assembly had misunderstood the<br>\nConstitution because in accordance with the original<br>\nconstitution, its main task was not to amend it but to make a new<br>\none.<\/p>\n<p>He surmised that the Assembly had not taken steps to make a<br>\nnew constitution because its members were incapable. He proposed<br>\nthat the government set up an expert team to design a new draft<br>\nconstitution that would be submitted to the Assembly to endorse.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Indonesia can learn from constitutional reform in the<br>\nPhilippines. (Former) president Cory Aquino, who succeeded in<br>\ntoppling Marcos&apos; authoritarian regime through a popular revolt,<br>\nset up an expert team to make a new constitution,&quot; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Harun also questioned the numerous past and new Assembly<br>\ndecrees, part of which he alleged were contradictory,<br>\nunconstitutional and violated the law.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Because of this many Assembly decrees have raised confusion<br>\namong the people,&quot; he said.<\/p>\n<p>He cited an example where the Constitution stipulates the<br>\npresident&apos;s five-year term of office. However, Assembly Decree<br>\nNo. 3, issued in 1978, allows the Assembly to recommend a special<br>\nsession &quot;to impeach&quot; him.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The country would remain chaotic if we had a new president<br>\nannually,&quot; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Emotional<\/p>\n<p>Mochtar Pabottingi, a senior researcher from the Indonesian<br>\nInstitute of Sciences (LIPI), deplored the emotional tone<br>\nhighlighting the constitutional amendment process where all<br>\nfactions at the Assembly seemed to be fighting for their own<br>\ninterests.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;All factions should conduct the amendments in a friendly and<br>\ntransparent atmosphere for the sake of the nation, and above<br>\ntheir own interests,&quot; he said.<\/p>\n<p>He criticized recent voting by the Assembly&apos;s Ad Hoc committee<br>\nto decide whether the Constitution&apos;s preamble should be<br>\nmaintained or replaced with the Islamic-based Piagam Jakarta,<br>\nsaying the Assembly should respect and accept the numerous<br>\nreligions and ethnicities in the country.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;The Assembly should be wise and selective on fundamental and<br>\nsensitive issues. They should know the fundamental substance that<br>\nshould be maintained and other matters that could be decided<br>\nthrough voting,&quot; he said.<\/p>\n<p>He also regretted the presence of appointed military and<br>\npolice representatives dealing with the constitutional<br>\namendments, saying they were not representing the people but<br>\ncertain minority groups in society, namely the Indonesian<br>\nMilitary (TNI) and the National Police.<\/p>\n<p>Asked to comment on the government&apos;s much-criticized<br>\nperformance, Mochtar said President Abdurrahman Wahid&apos;s policies<br>\nand vision were on the right path to uphold democracy.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Compared to the last two presidents, Gus Dur&apos;s efforts to<br>\nuphold democracy and human rights should win the people&apos;s<br>\nsupport,&quot; he said, referring to the President&apos;s popular name and<br>\nadding that all components of the nation, including the House of<br>\nRepresentatives and the Assembly, should be held responsible for<br>\nthe stagnant economy and political instability.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, he also supported calls for the Assembly to<br>\npress the government to make necessary corrections and changes in<br>\nthe government to defuse the crisis. (rms)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/amendment-to-constitution-sparks-criticism-from-experts-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}