{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1473876,
        "msgid": "agos-plans-to-withdraw-disputed-funds-criticized-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-03-06 00:00:00",
        "title": "AGO's plans to withdraw disputed funds criticized",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "AGO's plans to withdraw disputed funds criticized The Jakarta Post, Jakarta Despite increasing protests, the Attorney General's Office (AGO) insisted upon executing a court ruling on Friday requiring Bank Permata, owned by the government, to return Rp 546.5 billion (about US$65 million) in funds to a company called PT Era Giat Prima (EGP).",
        "content": "<p>AGO's plans to withdraw disputed funds criticized<\/p>\n<p>The Jakarta Post, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>Despite increasing protests, the Attorney General's Office<br>\n(AGO) insisted upon executing a court ruling on Friday requiring<br>\nBank Permata, owned by the government, to return Rp 546.5 billion<br>\n(about US$65 million) in funds to a company called PT Era Giat<br>\nPrima (EGP).<\/p>\n<p>\"Whatever happens, the court ruling must be adhered to because<br>\nthe legal decision on the issue is final,\" AGO spokesman Kemas<br>\nYahya Rahman announced to the public.<\/p>\n<p>The dispute surrounding the funds started when the now-<br>\ndefunct Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA), in 2002<br>\nmerged five ailing banks -- including Bank Bali -- to form Bank<br>\nPermata, now the country's 10th largest bank in terms of assets.<\/p>\n<p>It later turned out that during the merger process, the agency<br>\nhad used Rp 546.5 billion stashed away in a Bank Bali account --<br>\nbut the money was not supposed to be used as it was the subject<br>\nof legal proceedings surrounding the Bank Bali case involving the<br>\nowner of EGP, Djoko Tjandra.<\/p>\n<p>The Bank Bali scandal erupted in 1999 and revolved around<br>\nallegations that EGP had illegally obtained the funds from the<br>\nbank.  IBRA then canceled the transaction, while Djoko and others<br>\ninvolved were charged with corruption and convicted by lower<br>\ncourts.<\/p>\n<p>But the Supreme Court last year overturned Djoko's conviction<br>\non all charges, which means that IBRA -- or the government -- now<br>\nmust return the disputed money to Djoko and EGP.<\/p>\n<p>The AGO's plan to execute the ruling was greeted with protests<br>\nfrom many anticorruption activists, who said it would cause<br>\nlosses of state funds.<\/p>\n<p>The Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW) demanded the AGO<br>\npostpone the execution plan and seek a judicial review on the<br>\ncase to annul the ruling.<\/p>\n<p>\"That's the only way for the AGO to act as a \"lawyer of the<br>\nstate\", instead of becoming a \"lawyer for Djoko\" as it currently<br>\nshows in this case,\" ICW said in a statement, referring to Djoko<br>\nTjandra, a co-owner of EGP.<\/p>\n<p>The corruption watchdog based his argument on the fact that<br>\nthe transaction between Bank Bali and EGP violated existing<br>\nregulations and that the Bank Bali case was still underway for<br>\nother suspects.<\/p>\n<p>\"If the AGO insists on executing the ruling, we, along with<br>\nother elements of society, will file a class action law suit<br>\nagainst the AGO,\" ICW said in the statement signed by coordinator<br>\nTeten Masduki.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/agos-plans-to-withdraw-disputed-funds-criticized-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}