{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1279727,
        "msgid": "after-the-truce-what-1447893297",
        "date": "2000-09-05 00:00:00",
        "title": "After the truce, what?",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "After the truce, what? The \"humanitarian pause\" agreed upon in Aceh looks increasingly more like an opportunity for both sides in the conflict -- the Indonesian Military (TNI) and the separatist Free Aceh Movement (GAM) -- to bide their time for the inevitable ugly confrontation. The three-month agreement, which expired on Aug. 31, has done little to contain the violence.",
        "content": "<p>After the truce, what?<\/p>\n<p>The \"humanitarian pause\" agreed upon in Aceh looks<br>\nincreasingly more like an opportunity for both sides in the<br>\nconflict -- the Indonesian Military (TNI) and the separatist Free<br>\nAceh Movement (GAM) -- to bide their time for the inevitable ugly<br>\nconfrontation. The three-month agreement, which expired on Aug.<br>\n31, has done little to contain the violence. Instead, both sides<br>\nhave used the greater part of the lull afforded by the agreement<br>\nto beef up their personnel and weaponry, and consolidate their<br>\npositions.<\/p>\n<p>With this in mind, one is left to wonder what was the<br>\nobjective in entering into this agreement in the first place, and<br>\nwhat is the objective now in extending the humanitarian pause? If<br>\nreal peace is the ultimate goal of the truce agreement, we have<br>\nseen no signs either side wishing to start negotiations.<\/p>\n<p>The truce may have allowed some humanitarian programs to be<br>\nimplemented in Aceh to alleviate the people's suffering, even as<br>\nthe fighting continued. Some people may argue inconceivably that<br>\nthe violence would have been worse had it not been for the<br>\nhumanitarian pause; they will say the exercise has not been a<br>\ntotal waste. That, however, is hardly comforting for the people<br>\nof Aceh, who continue to live in uncertainty and fear, now even<br>\nmore so than before, while the people in Jakarta figure out what<br>\nto do next after extending the truce agreement.<\/p>\n<p>In the absence of any formal negotiations, the government<br>\ndecided in Jakarta over the weekend to unilaterally extend the<br>\nhumanitarian pause for one month, setting new, tougher, terms for<br>\nGAM to comply with for a longer extension. The offer still<br>\nrevolves around the humanitarian pause and its implementation.<\/p>\n<p>There are no indications the government will take the matter<br>\nfurther than this. Even if GAM agrees to the offer, the<br>\nhumanitarian pause likely will be treated by both sides the way<br>\nit has been treated for the last three months: an opportunity to<br>\nbuy even more time to consolidate.<\/p>\n<p>How long the two sides can keep up with this waiting game is<br>\nanybody's guess. But before an ugly confrontation erupts, the<br>\ngovernment should use the extension of the humanitarian pause to<br>\nopen negotiations with GAM, as well as other groups in Aceh, to<br>\nexplore the possibility of real peace in the province.<\/p>\n<p>The humanitarian pause agreement was a major breakthrough when<br>\nit was signed by representatives of Jakarta and GAM in Geneva in<br>\nMay. It was the first real attempt on the part of the government<br>\nto restore peace in Aceh. The government may have come under fire<br>\nfrom politicians in Jakarta for giving GAM an international<br>\nplatform, but it was a realistic step to take to break the<br>\nimpasse, and probably the only step the government could have<br>\nmade. Whether we like it or not, GAM is a force to be reckoned<br>\nwith -- with real organization and real supporters and<br>\nsympathizers -- and no peace can be secured in Aceh without its<br>\ncooperation.<\/p>\n<p>After making the courageous decision to recognize GAM's<br>\nexistence through the signing of the agreement, however, the<br>\ngovernment failed to follow through effectively. In fact, the<br>\ngovernment seems to be at a total loss as to what it should do<br>\nnow. The best it could come up with to date is to extend the<br>\nhumanitarian pause to buy more time, something GAM will happily<br>\naccept.<\/p>\n<p>At first glance, negotiations look out of the question given<br>\nthe government and GAM's irreconcilable positions. Jakarta has<br>\nruled out independence as an option, while GAM, by its very name<br>\nand definition, is a movement for an independent state.<\/p>\n<p>But that is precisely the purpose of negotiations: to bridge<br>\nthe gap and explore a middle ground acceptable to both sides.<br>\nMore than just buying time to delay an inevitable armed<br>\nconfrontation, negotiations offer a chance for a peaceful<br>\nsolution.<\/p>\n<p>That middle ground is essentially not that difficult to<br>\nenvisage. Having recognized GAM's existence, the government<br>\nshould move one step further by offering GAM the opportunity to<br>\nbecome a regional political party which could fight for its<br>\nindependence cause through the democratic process of general<br>\nelections. In return, GAM should agree to surrender its weapons.<br>\nBallots, rather than bullets, should determine the fate of Aceh,<br>\nwhatever that fate may be.<\/p>\n<p>All it takes is for the government and GAM to show the<br>\npolitical will to enter into negotiations; and the humanitarian<br>\npause would be a good time to start the process.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/after-the-truce-what-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}