{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1407186,
        "msgid": "affirmative-action-wont-work-1447893297",
        "date": "1998-07-11 00:00:00",
        "title": "Affirmative action won't work",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Affirmative action won't work By Iwan Pranoto BANDUNG (JP): Political observer Jusuf Wanandi said in the Jakarta Post on July 1, 1998, that a policy of affirmative action would bring Indonesian people closer together. The rationale for such a policy was that existing racial tensions had come about as the result of the gap between rich and poor. I strongly believe that implementing such a policy in Indonesia is inappropriate.",
        "content": "<p>Affirmative action won&apos;t work<\/p>\n<p>By Iwan Pranoto<\/p>\n<p>BANDUNG (JP): Political observer Jusuf Wanandi said in the<br>\nJakarta Post on July 1, 1998, that a policy of affirmative action<br>\nwould bring Indonesian people closer together.<\/p>\n<p>The rationale for such a policy was that existing racial<br>\ntensions had come about as the result of the gap between rich and<br>\npoor.<\/p>\n<p>I strongly believe that implementing such a policy in<br>\nIndonesia is inappropriate. The policy has worked in neighboring<br>\nMalaysia because the bureaucracy there is reasonably clean, but<br>\nthat is not case with our own system. How can we be sure that<br>\nhelp intended for poor people will reach the right target?<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the issue cannot be set clearly along ethnic<br>\nlines because as Wanandi pointed out, not all Chinese-Indonesians<br>\nare rich. Contrary to popular belief, many of them are very poor.<\/p>\n<p>Populist sentiment would have it that racial tensions which<br>\nexist between Chinese-Indonesians and those of Malay origin have<br>\ncome about because of the relative affluence of the former, but<br>\nthis is not true. If it were true, tensions would exist between<br>\nrich Malays and poor Malays, but this is not the case.<\/p>\n<p>We can therefore conclude that economic factors are not the<br>\nprimary cause of racial tension. There must be something else.<\/p>\n<p>One reason is that we still cannot see people as they really<br>\nare. We still cannot accept other people if they are different<br>\nfrom us and we are more interested in the label one bears than<br>\nthe qualities one has. It is more important to consider one&apos;s<br>\nreligion, race, ethnic background and gender, rather than to<br>\nconsider one&apos;s attitude and expertise. It seems we are not yet<br>\nmature enough to become a great nation.<\/p>\n<p>We should ease the tension using a variety of methods, but<br>\naffirmative action is not one of them. To fight racism with<br>\nracism, which affirmative action does, is inherently<br>\ncontradictory.<\/p>\n<p>Our society must improve its respect for universal human<br>\nvalues and we must start to see things differently. Jobs should<br>\nno longer be filled on the basis of race. Teaching people to<br>\ncommunicate with others without considering race is the most<br>\neffective way to fight racism.<\/p>\n<p>The objective of affirmative action is good, but the means of<br>\ngetting there is wrong. The objective cannot justify the means.<\/p>\n<p>Deep inside we can see and feel that we are all the same and<br>\nthat we live on the same planet. It is true that we are not all<br>\nexactly the same, but God created us with variations so that we<br>\ncould learn from these differences. Imagine if we had to live in<br>\na world where everybody looked the same. It would be very boring,<br>\nwouldn&apos;t it?<\/p>\n<p>There is an old fable on this subject. A group of fleas lived<br>\non the skin of a dog and ate by sucking his blood. They slept in<br>\nthe dog&apos;s hair -- it really was a very cozy place to live. &quot;Skin<br>\nsweet skin,&quot; they used to say.<\/p>\n<p>One day, a new group of fleas joined them. The two groups<br>\nlived together peacefully on the dog until some fleas declared<br>\nthe dog belonged to the first group of flees only. The new group<br>\ndid not have equal rights to the dog&apos;s blood and were<br>\ndiscriminated against. The first group of fleas became known as<br>\nthe indigenous fleas and the second group were always referred to<br>\nas nonindigenous.<\/p>\n<p>This lead to discord between the two groups and the tension<br>\nwas such that even the dog could feel it.<\/p>\n<p>After contemplating the problem for a while, the dog<br>\nphilosophically mused: &quot;It is absurd. They are both living on my<br>\nbony body. They are sucking the same blood, my blood. They are<br>\nsleeping in the same skin, my skin. They all are parasites on my<br>\nbody. How can one colony of fleas declare that they have more<br>\nright to suck my blood and enjoy my body than another colony.&quot;<br>\nThe dog then asked himself: &quot;How can one group of flees call<br>\nthemselves indigenous and brand others nonindigenous. Aren&apos;t they<br>\nthe same fleas and created by the same God?&quot;<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a lecturer at the Bandung Institute of<br>\nTechnology.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/affirmative-action-wont-work-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}